User talk:Sibadd
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Welcome
|
[edit] Question about Handsworth Park
Hi, I'm responding to your question at Wikipedia:Newcomers help page. If you let me know what was the name of the file then I can delete it for you.--Commander Keane 17:54, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
- Or, if you are saying that the version you originaly saved at Handsworth Park, Birmingham UK is incorrect, you can just edit the page and modify it - there's no need the delete the previous revision.--Commander Keane 18:01, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
"Handsworth Park wiki" was the incorrectly uploaded file, but the link you just gave me to "Handsworth Park, UK" looks correct (tho' it may not yet conform to Wiki convention which I've still to learn). Can you tell me why I can't get "Handsworth Park" on the Wikipedia Search. Has it yet to be vetted? Also if is accepted how do I link it to other Handsworth references in Wiki? Thanks Simon
-
- I actually just moved Handsworth Park, Birmingham UK to Handsworth Park (since it's the only one, I don't think there is a need to establish that it's in Birmingham).
- The search index only gets updated every few weeks (we have limited development team), but if you hit "Go" then you should be taken straight to Handsworth Park.
- You can make a link by enclosing a word in square brackets. For example:
[[Handsworth]]looks like Handsworth, and[[Handsworth, West Midlands|WhateverYouLike]]looks like WhateverYouLike
- I'll go through the article and add some standard Wikipedia style feature if you like. Also, the information isn't copyrighted is it? I notice that it is a precis - is that a free resource? I'll remove your name and contacts detail from the article, and put them on the talk page (except your email - since you might get spam).--Commander Keane 20:09, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- Oh yeah, remember to sign your edits on talk pages. You can do that by typing
--~~~~.--Commander Keane 20:44, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
- Oh yeah, remember to sign your edits on talk pages. You can do that by typing
-
[edit] Handsworth Park
Dear Commander K
Many thanks. Yes "Go" worked v. satisfyingly.
I like the tidying up you've done as well. The material is not copyrighted. The only contentious item I'd suspect is the contested reasons for moving the Carnival/Festival to another site although it had its Birmingham origins in Handsworth Park.
I am trying to grasp some of the other instructions. Do you mean I must type in "..____" or is it just "____" or even "----"? Repeat please.
I was going to go to the other Handsworth references (some of them - not the Handsworth in Sheffield) and insert a link back to my entry but although I am not unfamiliar with hyperlink insertion, i can't quite understand your instructions. Do square brackets make the insertion become a hyperlink?
Best Simon
- Well to type your signature you literally type the tilda 4 times. The tilda looks like
~. So if you put~~~~on any page, when you save (or show preview) your signature and date will be displayed.
- The linking examples I gave you were for internal links - to other Wikipedia articles. What you probably want is to know how to do external links. Examples:
[http://www.google.com Google is a website]looks like Google is a website[http://www.yahoo.com]looks like [1]http://www.altavista.comlooks like http://www.altavista.com
- --Commander Keane 23:04, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
Dear Commander
When I try to edit my entry. Carnival is misspelled as "Carnivale" the edit link brings up only the references and not the main body of text.
Sorry to bother you with all these questions as I learn. Also did you put in the link to Handsworth Park in the Handsworth reference? I wasn't me as far as I know as I could not bring up that part of the text. Any reasons?
S
- You are not bothering me - helping new users is what I like doing around here! The problem you are having with not being able to edit "Carnivale" is that you are using the [edit] button near the "References" section instead of the "edit this page" tab which is at the very top of the page. Using "edit this page" will allow you to view/edit the whole article.
- I didn't add the link to Handsworth Park in Handsworth, West Midlands - it existed previously. Oh yes, and try to rember to sign - it makes it easier for me to make it to your talk page.--Commander Keane 23:18, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
-
- I should probably mention that
~~~~doesn't work in edit summaries, just normal pages.--Commander Keane 23:54, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
- I should probably mention that
[edit] Roma people
I'd removed the references you added. Roma is nation of cca 8 millions and the links you added do not really feel as /that/ relevant for the article. Pavel Vozenilek 19:39, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
- You can use Category:Roma people to classify your article. The main article is already too big and should be splitted. Alternatively, Category:History of Roma people could be used (I can create it you prefere).
- Using category means adding text like [[Category:XYZ]] to the bottom of the article. Pavel Vozenilek 22:23, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Black Patch Park
Can you help wikify my latest entry on Black Patch Park? Also, a volunteer has taken out my x-reference to Roma people (I realise this is a v.sensitive issue) but the history of this park revolves around the way the Romany were evicted from it. My long term friend - a Gypsy and campaigner for Gypsy rights and author of a book on Gypsies of the New Forest - Len Smith - has told me that Black Patch Park is well known in Romany History. We now have the irony that the present campaign to protect the park is being assisted by the descendents of the very families who were forcibly evicted from the Black Patch to create a park for the new industrial workers. Do you not think this is a Roma People case study worthy of a x-reference between Black Patch and Roma people?
Many thanks for your assistance. By the way i do not resent the editing. it is what Wiki is all about and i appreciate the opportunity to make the case but in order to do it properly I value your help. Simon
- Roma people. The place to discuss whether or not the references should be included is on the talk page of Roma people: Talk:Roma people. See what other editors think there.
- I will gladly take a look at Black Patch Park for you.
- Please remeber to sign. I explained it above, but if you want further explantion on how to do it I will happily elaborate.--Commander Keane 20:39, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
- Signing
You just need to use ~~~~ on talk pages (user talk pages and article talk pages) when you make a new comment. Articles are never signed. You place it after your comment. Don't worry about the comments you haven't signed previosuly, just sign from now on. For example when I make this comment (explaining how to sign) I will place ~~~~ at the end, and you will see: Commander Keane 22:48, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Fred Dineage vs Fred Dinenage
Hi Sibadd!
I've just unpicked the changes you made, where you converted all references to Fred Dinenage to Fred Dineage and then attempted to redirect the article.
Mr Dinenage's name is spelt Dinenage, despite its pronunciation. You can see this by visiting the Meridian website, Transdiffusion and Fred Dinenage at the Internet Movie Database.
Let me know on my talk page if you've got any questions! ➨ ❝REDVERS❞ 11:11, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
- Hi Sibadd!
- Heh, don't worry about it! If you lined up all the embarassing mistakes I've made on the 'pedia from end to end... well, it's a long, long list, put it that way! I only knew about Fred's spelling in the first place because of a long thread some years ago on Paramount Teletext, of all places. Eventually, to solve the question, someone from Paramount rang Meridian and asked them - and they put the guy through to Fred and he laughingly confirmed it. It's stuck in my mind since then! It's also one of those regular threads that pop up on MHPchat every couple of months.
- So, don't let in bother you! You did right making the changes you thought were right (as we say here: Be Bold!). Keep adding stuff to Wikipedia. We need you! Cheers :) ➨ ❝REDVERS❞ 10:43, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] inserting image
Hi, I'm a friend of commander keane and here to help. First you have to upload the image you want from the toolbox on the left side (upload file). If it's already uploaded, then you have to type [[Image:Portrait.jpg|thumb|This is a portrait of someone.]] Let me (or commander keane) know if you have some more questions. Happy editing. :) Gflores Talk 02:33, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
In reply to your email, I presume you are talking about Image:BlackPatchSnow.jpg for Black Patch Park. It needs to be under a particular license, an acceptable one at that. Choose one from Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and ensure your friend, Karen, approves of it. You can try {{CopyrightedFreeUse}} or {{No rights reserved}} or {{GFDL}} or any others in the sections of for image creators, public domain, free licenses, or fair use in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags. hope that answers your query. -- Zondor 12:53, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
- including information about the author would be nice. -- Zondor 12:57, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
Regarding the new license edit, it looks acceptable. It has as much information as possible to help maintain it. You can sign your username with it. You may want to add email addresses but that may be too much. -- Zondor 13:13, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
Many thanks Zondor Sibadd 16:58, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[
[edit] Denys Rayner
You can ask me questions anytime on talk page, that's fine! I guess someone will edit your writing sooner or later (edited mercilessly is the popular phrase for it) and conflicts can be frustrating. If you keep cool, all will be well.
I read Denys Rayner and found it to be very enjoyable. I fixed up the images so the captions display. Other that that I couldn't find anything to improve! If you are looking for ways to better an article you can take a look at Wikipedia:Featured articles for inspiration.--Commander Keane 14:39, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
I have made a note/comment via the 'Discussion' tab on the Denys Rayner article. Suggest it would be usefull if all the discussion re Denys takes place there so that all readers of the main article can comment if they feel the need. Boatman 08:29, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Denys Rayner photo copyright
Mmm, this sounds tricky. If you feel you own the photo you could release it under a free licence, but I feel that it's a bit like Charles Dickens giving up a copy of his latest novel - you don't really own it (but I'm not a lawyer or anything like that, just a guess).
However, we can use a copyrighted photo from a book under the Fair use provision. For example, if the image is the only one available of him, then it would be fair use (even though it is copyrighted). In that case you would use {{Fair use in|Denys Rayner}} on the image page.--Commander Keane 04:24, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Google query
Sorry for not responsing to your google query, I did read it before but it slipped my mind. The way google indexes (records) web pages is something of a mystery. Sometimes it will index a Wikipedia page in two days. In this case I think google will pick it up eventually, we will just have to be patient. I don't think we can influence google indexing. Howver, for a better google explanation you might like to try the Reference desk.--04:07, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:DenysRayner1943.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:DenysRayner1943.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 11:32, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Copyright etc
Hi. To my knowledge physical ownership of a print of a photograph doesn't confer any ownership of the copyright or an implied licence to copy. Morwen - Talk 14:23, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
Darn it, but thanks, Morwen Sibadd 15:06, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Kingdom Hall
Its on Tiego Ave in Toronto, Ontario. joshbuddytalk 18:32, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
many thanks. Your answer passed on to the person who asked. Sibadd 18:52, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] On userpages
As a note, it's generally considered bad form to ask comments on the actual userpage (like you did on User:Commander Keane - do it on the talk page instead. Thanks! JJE 21:14, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
Thanks. lessons beiong learned Sibadd 21:51, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Black Patch move
Taking a look at Talk:Black Patch Park, Natalya seems to agree that a merge is needed. The correct procedure is to add merge tags to both articles (Natalya has already done this) and then discuss what the better title should be. There is no need to contact the original author of Black Patch, since they have no ownership of the article. However you can if you wish, it seems to be Etat (they haven't edited for a month though).
So just wait a few days for discussion, and carry out the merge of material into Black Patch Park. Once you have merged the info in to Black Patch Park you can make Black Patch a redirect to Black Patch Park (by replacing it's contents with #REDIRECT [[Black Patch Park]]). If you want some help merging, just ask me.--Commander Keane 04:46, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
- I forgot to deal with the issue of disambiguation. Instead of redirecting Black Patch we could make it a disambiguation page, with Black Patch Park one of the entries. Just give me a shout if you need a hand with that.--Commander Keane 05:26, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
Thanks Commander Keane. I think Black Patch Park might be better becasue there are somany Black Patch's in UK and possibly elsewhere. it's a generic name for many post-industrial waste spaces! Sowe could have a reference back to Black Patch Park or a disambiguation (sorry still not on top of this)next time a Black Patch entry for elsewhere appears in Wiki Sibadd 16:20, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Re:Black Patch merge with Black Patch Park
The merge looks good, thanks for taking care of it. My only suggestion might be to rearrange the pictures so they flow with the article a little better and don't move the contents around, but that's just a stylistic choice. :) One suggestion, you might want to employ the use of the "Show preview" button more (if you are not doing so already). That way, you can see what your edit will look like before you save the page, and if you want to change it you won't have to re-edit it, making it a bit easier.
Commander Keane had a point above about turning Black Patch into a disambiguation page (rather than a redirect) - this sounds like a good idea, and I'll bring the idea up on the talk page. Please add your thoughts. -- Natalya 15:51, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Re:Handsworth Park links - inconsistency
Links can be hard to work with! I've gone ahead and formatted the links on the two pages, but I'll try and explain the different ways they work so you can change them as you would like, and know for next time.
- By typing the URL of the link, you get the link as a URL.
- Typing:
- http://www.google.com
- Makes:
- By putting the URL in single brackets, you get a numbered link.
- Typing:
- [http://www.google.com]
- Makes:
- By putting the URL in single brackets and then putting text after the URL but still in the brackets, you get a link with whatever the text is.
- Typing:
- [http://www.google.com Google]
- Makes:
- And finally, by putting text outside of the brackets after a link, you get regular text, plus whatever you had with the brackets.
- Typing:
- [http://www.google.com Google], a search engine
- Makes:
- Google, a search engine
I hope that helps! For more information, you can take a look at the "How to link" section of External links. -- Natalya 22:12, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
Really really helpful even though iot;s straightforward once explained. Many thanks, Natalya Sibadd 02:06, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Can you explain type of copyright
[3]: It's certainly copyrighted and too restrictive for Wikipedia in that you can't reproduce, reprint, or freely used. It really fits into none of any of the free license categories. The only one that can be considered is Fair Use, that is, in small or reduced proportions and that is used fairly. Fair use can be things like samples, logo, cover arts, promotional material, screen shots, publicty photos, etc. (see Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Fair use). Free licenses are much encouraged over fair use ones. -- Zondor 09:11, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:BlackPatchSnow.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:BlackPatchSnow.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Image legality questions. 10:56, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Welcome message
Hi ElectricEye. I'm a little confused. Are you gently telling me I am doing something wrong.I'm not quite sure why I have been sent this tutorial and I will be glad of advice.Sibadd 19:14, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
- I don't see that you've done anything wrong. I just noticed no one ever welcomed you to Wikipedia. :) --ElectricEye 19:17, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
Have you ever checked out Wikipedia:Village pump? There's a lot of things going on there, you might be interested. If not, that's fine too. --ElectricEye 19:19, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
Oh that's really nice. Sorry for sounding a bit apprehensive. I am so enjoying Wikipedia and using my entry on Denys Rayner as a basis for a possible biography. Having the entry is great becasue I can refer informants to it and they can either mailme directly or edit the entry in Wiki. Brilliant! Thanks again for your welcome and I will check through the tutorial advice in more detail. I know there's a lot to learn.Sibadd 19:22, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] RE:Image Black Patch Park
Sure.
1. OrphanBot will not even look at a properly tagged image. You can re-upload the image if you don't know the copyright tag templates by heart. When uploading an image, select the appropriate option from the dropdown "licensing" menu below the image summary.
2. Contact Carnildo, the worthy owner and operator of the aforementioned robot.
Good luck! --Chodorkovskiy 04:30, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Jack Hargreaves
Hi, it looks good, I made a few small changes, and added some categories, if you could provide some references then that would pretty much complete it. well done. Martin 14:57, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] ....and Denys Rayner!
Thanks v.much Bluemoose. Look i haven't worked out if this is the right way to reply to someone who's helped and improved someone else's work. Anyway until I hear otherwise thanks. I'm a little confused about adding references as most of what i know i know because the subject of the article was my stepfather and I have been collaborating with the writer Paul Peacock who's writing his biography. For me the Wiki article has been an amazing exercise in trying to summarise the life of a person from whom I'd never tried to stand back, but I hope I've also produced a piece that is also interesting anhd useful to others. Perhaps I should put JH's published books in references along with the Nugent Report. Any suggestions? Can you also have a look over my entry on Denys Rayner another person who influenced me a great deal and who died in 1967. I am seriously thinking of expanding the article on Wikipedia into a fuller length biography, but working up the Wikipedia piece has been an excellent discipline.Sibadd 15:29, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
- I havent had time to fully read it, but it looks good too. As for references, anything (book, internet site etc.) that can be used to verify the information would be useful, as you have done on Denys Rayner. Martin 15:54, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Denys Rayner vandalised
Ok, I'll see what I can do even though I know nothing about Denys Rayner. --ElectricEye (talk) 18:10, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi, yes you did the right thing, although it is best to leave an edit summary along the lines of "reverted vandalism" or abreviated to "rvv", if it becomes persistent then an admin may block the user or the IP address. Martin 18:13, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Undoing vandalism
Hi Sibadd!
Thanks for letting me know about the vandalism to Denys Rayner and thanks for your quick revert of the vandal.
This vandal was an AOL user. Because AOL is incorrectly configured as an ISP, their users are effectively unaccountable when online. Whilst this may have positive implications for privacy, in practice it means that AOL users get a very much diminished internet experience and are routinely banned from many websites. AOL so far has refused to correctly configure their systems to send an identifying header that would still allow anonymity but prevent abuse.
This vandal, under that IP address, vandalised Denys Rayner and another random article. Under other IP addresses they will have vandalised other articles (they used an edit summary designed to specifically distract the Recent Changes patrollers from investigating).
Vandalism of Wikipedia is, unfortunately, a fact of life. It happens. There's no way of preventing it, and little than can be done to stop it without taking away the essential Wiki-ness of Wikipedia. All we can do is revert it on sight, just like you did. We have tools to help in this and a dedicate group of people at the Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit who monitor every new article and changed article in an attempt to cure vandalism as it happens. I estimate that our average time between an article being vandalised and it being restored is well under a minute! ➨ ЯЄDVERS 19:40, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] License tagging for Image:Boats8July06.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Boats8July06.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:05, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Re: Black Patch Park
I've formatted the lyrics a bit, which looks a bit better. Let me know if you'd like it different. Along the line of including lyrics in an article, take a look at WP:SONG#Lyrics, which discusses copyright issues of lyrics. -- Natalya 22:48, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:BlackPatchSnow.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:BlackPatchSnow.JPG. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fritz Saalfeld (Talk) 09:25, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] License tagging for Image:ChubVenables.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:ChubVenables.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:05, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
