User talk:Ramsquire
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This is a Wikipedia user talkpage.
This is not an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user this page belongs to (and the users whose comments appear on it) may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. You can leave me a message here. |
 |
 Archives |
|---|
Contents |
[edit] Thanks...
Thanks for endorsing the RFC. I'm actually started a RFCU in the case and hopefully something will get done about it. ---J.S (t|c) 05:04, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Cbuhl79 Sockpuppet
I suggest throwing down some diffs (and histories) with time/date stamps under the evidence section of your sock puppet case. Check the workspace for my (expired :( ) arbitration request for some examples. USER:Blaxthos/RfARB_Cbuhl79. /Blaxthos 19:27, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Okay, now what
So we have an RFC up on RPJ finally. (Something we should have done months ago, and I take the blame for that one - I just kept hoping he would go away on his own.) What do you think our next step should be? The RFC hasn't given RPJ the least bit of pause. I would suggest ArbCom, but their slow pace and reluctance to take certain cases makes me think perhaps we should persue mediation first. RPJ would likely reject mediation in a lengthy, incomprehensible screed, which would make the ArbCom case stronger. Or it might be a frustrating couple of weeks, and then we head to ArbCom. Thoughts? Gamaliel 18:43, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
- I would propose mediation first. If he refuses then we go to ArbCom. Apparently it's almost impossible to get cases passed by ArbCom, as there are only 6 active members right now, with 3 active members who rarely vote. If we were to take it to ArbCom now and they let it die in 10 days, RPJ may just get emboldened. Ramsquire (throw me a line) 19:06, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
-
- Good point, we don't want to accidentally give him a freer pass than he already has. Mediation it is. Gamaliel 19:09, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Your Friendly Advocate Arrives!
Hi, I've agreed to help you out as an advocate. Please feel free to ask me questions about any part of the process you like. Even though I have not had a formal account for long (I preferred the anon ip until I realized that it's more noble to put a name behind my words), I'm very familiar with WP policies, and I'm confident I'll be able to help you out. I will leave the mode of contact up to you (I'll be watching this page for your preference). If you prefer email, just head on over to my userpage and select "email this user" in the toolbox. I'm on WP a lot during the week, but it's better to try and email me if you need a quick response on the weekends. Talk to you later! →Bobby← 22:09, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking my case. The problems I have with this user is accurately stated in this RfC. Today I requested the assistance of the Mediation Cabal. Basically I don't think this guy can work well in this environment and should be banned. Any advice or guidance you can give will be greatly appreciated. I just want to make sure that I am not going too far. Contanct via my talk page should be fine for now. If the situation changes, I'll let you know. Ramsquire (throw me a line) 22:20, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
-
- Alright. RPJ left a message on my talk page asking if I agreed to advocate your case and inquiring whether or not he should seek advocacy. I simply told him that I had in fact agreed to advocate for you and it is always good to seek advocacy when confused about WP processes. He also stated that you and Gamaliel are in a group who want him banned from editing WP. Just wanted to let you know. It looks like your RfC is in good order; I'll pop over and leave a comment at some point. As to the Cabal Mediation (which is a good next step) I expect you may get a mediator within the next week or so. We'll have to be a bit patient with that. As a Cabal mediator myself, I know first hand how much time a case can take. Please let me know if there's anything I can do in the meantime. I might go ahead and bring in some outside editors and admins to try and get their views posted on the RfC, assuming this is ok with you. Have a good one, →Bobby← 14:55, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- Update - Just so you know, I went ahead and invited several user to leave a comment on the RfC page. I pretty much went through RPJ's talk page and contacted anyone who had an issue with the user in the past (which pretty much boiled down to everyone on the page). I know I said I was going to wait until I heard back from you, but I thought it would be better to give every involved editor plenty of time to leave a comment. I'll keep in touch about any future action I take. →Bobby← 16:04, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] FLS
Cool. That makes you the fifth known Fordham Law student or graduate with an active Wikipedia account including myself. How's cali? What do you do out there? Fun law things? - crz crztalk 19:15, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
