User talk:Nateji77

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents 1 Article Licensing 2 Hot Apple Pie (album) 3 Open Cup 4 Irish beer 5 Ron Newman 6 Your Comments on Davien Crow 7 Very nice 8 Denise Ho 9 Format of discography in Alpha (band) 10 Sure 11 RE: Nanjing 12 a heads-up on the List of Guantanamo Bay detainees 13 Wikipedia:Three Kingdoms Notice Board 14 Flamarande 15 Actress stub 16 Ayumi Asakura

[edit] Article Licensing

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

• Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
• Multi-Licensing Guide
• Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

OR

Option 2

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:

{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

[edit] Hot Apple Pie (album)

Please do not do cut and paste moves like you did when you moved content from Hot Apple Pie(album) to Hot Apple Pie (album). Under the GFDL licence, we need to keep the page histories so each editor's contributions can be properly credited. If you wish to move or rename an article, please either use the move tool (see m:Help:Moving a page for details) or list the page on Requested moves. Thanks. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 30 June 2005 16:43 (UTC)

[edit] Open Cup

The problem with "Round 1", "Round 2", etc, is the rounds now do not have the same amount of teams as they did in different years, so it makes a bad comparison. But you're right, "Round of 32" is not technically correct either. Sometimes "1/8 finals" is used for "Round of 16" and "1/16" for 32... Don't know what's best. --DR31 (talk) 13:57, 24 July 2005 (UTC)

For example, 1997: http://www.soccerhall.org/Competitions/1997_USOpenCup.htm. Or compare http://www.soccerhall.org/Competitions/1996_USOpenCup.htm and http://www.soccerhall.org/Competitions/1998_USOpenCup.htm. They're all different. But I do think it's been stable since all MLS teams started participating. --DR31 (talk) 12:27, 26 July 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Irish beer

You requested for this to be expanded, so I have done... Justinc 17:41, 30 July 2005 (UTC)

ok have added a little on red ale to the article. I cant find much information at the moment though. Justinc 10:52, 31 July 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Ron Newman

I tend to trust soccerhall.org: http://www.soccerhall.org/builders/ron_newman.htm . 1936 --DR31 (talk) 12:36, 3 August 2005 (UTC)

Who do we trust, an anonon note or soccer hall? --DR31 (talk) 13:02, 3 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Your Comments on Davien Crow

Delete. NN. having a poem published does not make you a poet, let alone a notable one. getting a picture on the wall at school does not make you an artist, let alone a notable one. but since the musicianship seems to be whats really at issue, i say Delete until the 2006 album is released, then if (and only if) that album meets the music test recreate. Nateji77 15:43, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

• I would like to point out that WP:MUSIC only has to be met by 1 requirement. So even if you do not view the CDs released on Kidatrium and Mushroomcloud Records as "Albums", the fact still remains that they (his band Sin Star) has been on 2 national tours. The remarks you made about the picture on the wall at school is churlish btw, VCU's center for the arts is very reputable for it's art galleries if you read the page on them here at wikipedia you'd know. Those tidibits you took cheap shots at were simply part of the biography, not claims to notability. The Music and the Web Design Company should be the deciding factors, and they DO meet the rules... So please reconsider. By all means message me back if you wish to discuss this.

• Look the point summarized is I am willing to work with you guys on why these were deleted but until now noone has given us any feedback and has even lied about stuff trying to get it deleted. All 3 of them meet the sufficient amount of requirements for WP:MUSIC, the guidelines in WP:Criteria_for_inclusion_of_biographies, Wikipedia:Importance, Wikipedia:Notability (the fact that suicide girls, gidget gein, and marilyn manson are involved and can be verified in those links should proove that) , Wikipedia:Fame_and_importance mainly the part stating "There is clear proof that a reasonable number of people are or were concurrently interested in the subject (eg. it is at least well-known in a community)" If you can't tell the community of Myspace.com and Livejournal.com alone are enough to meet this criterea you are blind. If you do google searches, go to forums and search their names, or visit internet archives you can find un-disputable information on the band from reputable sources, first hand accounts that are years older than these discussions, and intangible archives kept by internet archives. IF you want more detail read my above rant, your right I do sound mad about this, because I can't see how you can say they do not meet criterea or that this is a vanity page. Please accept my apologies for anything you have taken to be rude and please re-consider changing your vote. What Harm could it do ? BTW I am not trying to bully anyone, I can show you the location of the people threatening to come here and vandalize the hell out of Wikipedia. But I do not want that to be part of your decision at all. (please reference the large rebuttle on the discussion page itself)

I have posted this, I hope that some of you will consider looking for my information and reconsider your vote for now. A lot of people are simply responding to the rudeness of user:sin-thetik and some things I said are being misconstrude as threats. I am simply upset because of all the time it took to write these 3 articles, knowing they fit the guidelines, only to have somone delete them with the proof and verifiable facts right in front of them .. just their un-willingness to read them. Please think it over, I appreciate your time. I'm just a fan girl trying to be the first to get an article up about them since I have been running a fan site about them for almost 2 years now.

[edit] Very nice

I was impressed by your level-headed, sensible comments on Talk:Davien Crow. I was irriated by these antics as well, and I think you gave a great explanation without letting your emotions get the best of you. Friday (talk) 14:18, 23 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Denise Ho

Thanks for taking a look. Is there anything on there that actually looks notable? The list of (presumably) her records says she's some sort of recording artist, but is she likely to meet WP:MUSIC criteria? Tonywalton  | Talk 14:12, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

Thanks again for that. Yes, I wonder why en and not zh - perhaps the author didn't know there are multiple Wikipedias, I suppose… Tonywalton  | Talk 15:12, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Format of discography in Alpha (band)

Hi. Why Do you revert to the link Stargazing when there is a page there not about the said album? Shouldn't we link it to Stargazing (album) in this case? Karol 18:34, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

I see ya. Cheers. Karol 20:04, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Sure

As for your note on my talk page, I see no reason why not. Should I do it right away, or do you want time to work on your answers to the questions first? Friday (talk) 22:32, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

BTW, dunno how important this would be to most people, but I'd recommend making archives of your talk page available by a link at the top. People may wonder if you're trying to hide old content otherwise. Friday (talk) 23:59, 25 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] RE: Nanjing

Watched. Battlecruiser operational. Receiving transmission. Hailing frequencies open. Set a course. Engage! :D
-- Миборовский ^U|T|C|E 03:43, 4 October 2005 (UTC)

Trouble will visit our doorsteps soon... no need to actively seek it out. Besides, I'm busy elsewhere.
-- Миборовский ^U|T|C|E 04:07, 4 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] a heads-up on the List of Guantanamo Bay detainees

Greetings,

Since you voted to keep the article List of Guantanamo Bay detainees I thought I would give you a "heads-up". A copyright violation was filed against the article, on October 11th. It was filed by someone who had voted to delete the article on October 5th.

I believe that the copyright violation is entirely bogus. I believe it is bogus because, as explained in Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone Service, lists of facts, like lists of names, cannot be copyright. This Feist v. Rural case went all the way to the US Supreme Court, which made the possibly counter-intuitive ruling that the amount of effort someone put in to compiling a list plays no role in determining whether that list is eligible for copyright protection.

Even if alphabetic lists of names could be copyright, I believe the wikipedia list would not be violating copyright since the list was compiled from various sources.

Yes, I have considered that this user invoked a bogus copyright violation to achieve a result that failed in the {AfD}. Yes, I asked them to terminate the copyright violation process, in light of Feist v Rural. They declined. The backlog in the administrators dealing with copyright violations seems to be on the order of a month long.

Anyhow, I wanted the people who had shown interest in the article to not freak out, or feel betrayed, by seeing the copyright violation tag. -- Geo Swan 11:35, 19 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Three Kingdoms Notice Board

Hi, Nateji77,are you intrested in joining my three kingdoms portal?--Tgenieyi 14:52, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Flamarande

Hi, I made a few userboxes about ASoIaF, you can see them at Wikipedia:Userboxes/Books and use them at your leisure. I am not finished yet, but eventually I am going to make boxes for all the Houses and perhaps some more ( Nightswatch, etc ). If you understand enough about userboxer you can even improve them. If not, then just "pass the word" about it (please). Flamarande 14:09, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Actress stub

I'm aware of the procedure for deleting articles. :) Little or no content=speedy delete. Says so right on the page you quoted. It wasn't much more than a placeholder for the IMDb link. These kinds of articles are deleted all the time. In short, anyone researching this subject already knows this woman is a Japanese actress. Hope this clears things up for you. - Lucky 6.9 19:36, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ayumi Asakura

Hello, I prodded the article you created for deletion. If you think it should be kpet you should improve it, because it currently provides no context whatsoever. Best, ~ trialsanderrors 08:19, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

well.... there's a helluva lot of those for you to delete then. it was meant as a long term project related to the Cinema of Japan article i worked on--get the names in latin and kanji, see what i could expand afterwards. it's not going to happen now. wont ever happen unless i leave china.

to find out what to delete, you should start here List of Japanese actresses (not sure on the caps) and see what you think is too short or lacking in context. of course expanding the article yourself is a much better way to go than deleting it, but do what you want. there's a few in a similar page List of Japanese Actors (again, caps) but the women proved to be easier to find dual listings of romaji/kanji, given the number of online aidoru photo galleries.

if you decide to delete them speedy them with my blsssing.

Nateji77 06:19, 11 July 2006 (UTC)