User talk:Mhking

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archives
Jan 2005 – May 2006

Welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions to the coolest online encyclopedia I know of =). I sure hope you stick around; we're always in need of more people to create new articles and improve the ones we already have. You'll probably find it easiest to start with a tutorial of how the wikipedia works, and you can test stuff for yourself in the sandbox. When you're contributing, you'll probably find the manual of style to be helpful, and you'll also want to remember a couple important guidelines. First, write from a neutral point of view, second, be bold in editing pages, and third, use wikiquette. Those are probably the most important ones, and you can take a look at some others at the policies and guidelines page. You might also be interested in how to write a great article and possibly adding some images to your articles.

Be sure to get involved in the community – you can contact me at my talk page if you have any questions, and you can check out the village pump, where lots of wikipedians hang out and discuss things. If you're looking for something to do, check out the community portal. And whenever you ask a question or post something on a talk page, be sure to sign your name by typing ~~~~.

Again, welcome! It's great to have you. Happy editing! --Spangineer (háblame) 14:06, Jun 9, 2005 (UTC)

Contents 1 Selex (god) 2 VandalProof 1.2 Now Available 3 Wisconsin Historical Society Link on NBC article 4 EWS23's RfA 5 diabled list 6 Ok 7 List of text editors edit 8 Question 9 RfA/Gurch 10 Thanks 11 Vandalism to my user page 12 Thank you! 13 Thanks for Supporting my RfA! 14 RfA thanks! 15 Dresden files 16 RfA thanks 17 Thanks for your support in my RfA! 18 RE: Pokémon 19 Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot 20 Fox News 21 Legion 22 Final state highway naming conventions debate 23 Reverted to Vandalized version of Batman article 24 Interstate 285 and unbuilt interstate alignments...major edit 25 hey 26 Gary People 27 Openly Conservative 28 Go raibh maith agat! 29 Thanks Michael 30 Versus (TV channel) 31 Link spamming at Interstate Highway System 32 User:205.188.117.74 33 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bridgemonkey 34 External links 35 Prescription Cough Syrup 36 Rod Foster 37 BET 38 D* 39 List of United States over-the-air television networks 40 Jean-Michel Aulas 41 List of DirecTV channels possible deletion 42 Sec Def 43 Interstate 14/Qdub4lyfe 44 Ontario Highway 17 Image

[edit] Selex (god)

Selex is not a joke. It is truth. If you have a problem send EMAIL to tyluthan@yahoo.com THANK YOUOuijalover 20:04, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

I put the Selex (god) page on so it CAN be verified. I want the world to know that there are more religions in the world that people know about.Ouijalover 20:12, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

Respect me and i will respect you. You can not verifiy you live in the US so delete your page. I dont want to be mean but you are being a hipocrite.Ouijalover 20:20, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

Look, I respect that you wish to make wikipedia a informative website but you should spend your time deleting things that need deletion. What I put up on wikipedia is not hurting anybody. And who cares if it is unverifiable. The existanse of Jesus is not verifiable. It could be a conspiracy theory. And that is my point: Do not delete anything unless it is harmful.Ouijalover 20:45, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

Yeah. You know I am right and have a point. Just leave me alone. I aint hurting anyone. Go delete something like the " " entry. Or since it is unverifiable the jesus entry. Please just let me let the world know of my religion. Please just be a good person. I am not asking you to support it or join it. All I ask is that you respect our differences and let me put a page up. It is appropriat and it is not harmful. Thank you if you do decide to let me let the world knowOuijalover 00:19, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

I am not trying to be a jerk either. And Like I said I respect that you are trying to make wikipedia a good place. Would it be acceptable to make the "Tyluthan" and Selex (god) pages under my user:ouijalover page. Thank you.Ouijalover 00:30, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

THANK YOU! please do not delete those pages too.Ouijalover 00:33, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

Is there a way to put a easy to find link into wikipedia so people will easily find my page? Thank youOuijalover 00:38, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

I am aware that i am probobly pissing you off with all the comments but how do you create a sub page?Ouijalover 00:52, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

If you do not mind could you put a link to my page on yours?Ouijalover 00:54, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] VandalProof 1.2 Now Available

[edit] Wisconsin Historical Society Link on NBC article

Hi Mhking

I noticed you removed the link to the NBC collection at the Wisconsin Historical Society. I think people would like to know where the corporate archives of NBC are located. I may have gone overboard with listing the size of the collection, but people normally don't associate Wisconsin as a major holder of mass media collections. The Wisconsin Historical Society is a government agency with an over fifty year committment to collecting mass media materials in the US. It is not selling anything, unless you count the photocopies of documents people produce during their visit to Madison.

The NBC papers at the WHS are the office files of NBC executives from 1921-1955. It's over 500 boxes of material. If you want to see how NBC changed from a radio to a television network, you don't go to New York, you come to Madison, Wisconsin. We also have the papers of United Artists, Rod Serling, Kirk Douglas, David Brinkley and hundreds of other well known media figures and organizations. This is partly due to the prestige of having the NBC collection, but it was also helped by the fact that no one else made an effort to even ask for this type of material in the 50's and 60's. United Artists gave us their scripts, posters, lobby card, pressbooks, legal contracts and more because UA saw no value to keeping them.

[edit] EWS23's RfA

Hello Michael! Thank you for your support of my request for adminship. I look forward to running into you more on the project. Thanks again, and if you ever see something you feel I could be doing better, feel free to leave me a message. EWS23 | (Leave me a message!) 02:32, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] diabled list

this is quick and you can delete this. I am trying to add a section that lists every player on the DL (disabled list) as of now. Please do ont interrupt my work again. This is not junk.

[edit] Ok

Ok you don't want to hear the truth so i'll ask you in a lying type of way, "Why did you remove my question for Jimbo Wales???" 61.102.220.70 15:00, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] List of text editors edit

Hi,

You just reverted a change I made to "List of text editors"

Link to edit

I feel like my addition is worthwhile. Perhaps this was a mistake?

Best, Andy

[edit] Question

You de-'vandalised' my edit to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Keith_Andrews_%28criminologist%29 and yet all I was doing was removing irrelevant garbage from that page which was neither talk, as per Wiki guidelines, nor pertinent. I've just edited it to be blank. I see no reason why it should have anything on it at all. If the person responsible for tinkering with the main page for that person thinks that that information is important enough then they should put it on the main page. Do you not agree ? And the info I added first time around was in reference to an accusation by them of me (?) writing "anonymous letters" and addressed to "George" (?) - see their last couple of edits to the main page. I was simply using the 'talk' page for the purpose for which it was intended.

Hi. I was wondering if I could put those Selex and Tyluthan pages up. I forgot to tell that threr is verifiability. The sources are just hard to get.Ouijalover 18:59, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

I am surely aware of the fact that I sound like a raving lunatic. But like I said there are two books out about it. They are just accessable only to a follower of Tyluthan. Plus I am 12. I am very smart but with my lack a philisofical skills I could never create religion. I don't expect you to believe that but please do. I still do not understand why I can not put it up. It is truthful and with the HBoT (Hoy Bible of Tyluthan) It is verifiable.Ouijalover 22:28, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Hello. My name is jack abd I wanted to let you know that user:ouijalover is not insane. I will agree he is eccentric. But I am a tyluthan too. Tyluthan is real. May Me or Ouijalover put a page up for Tyluthan and Selex? PleaseTyluthan 22:49, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

How do become and administrator?Ouijalover 22:51, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

When I said there was only a few tyluthans i forgot to remamber the ones not in ct. there are about 3,000 tyluthans. And the HBoT is not secret. you just need to request it by email.Ouijalover 00:08, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

Tyluthan is not a joke. It is truth and you will have to believe me. And the tyluthan@yahoo is not a "personal" email. All tyluthans can access it.Please just deal with the pages that me and other tyluthans put up. It is not harmful and it is verifiable.Ouijalover 00:16, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

As I have said about 50 times the book is easy to get from email. Most of the followers are paranoid and do not like to be reaserched. If you want it send an email to tyluthan@yahoo.comHBot 00:25, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

Why can't you just leave the page alone? it is harmlessTyluthan 00:48, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

Tyluthan IS verifiable. the HBoT

I can all but the widely availible part.Tyluthan 00:58, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

I already told you It can be accessed. You just need to request it ny Email.Tyluthan 13:29, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

Remember the Tyluthan Ritual Books can not be seen by the public including normal Tyluthans. That does not apply to the HBoT (Holy Bible of Tyluthan).Tyluthan 13:31, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

Tyluthan is not some sick joke. And even if it was you would still have to tolerate it because of the First ammendment wich clearly states FREEDOM OF RELIGIONTyluthan 13:34, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

You know that deleteing thoses religios pages is a Felony Hate Crime? Just thought you should know. Lets just say you are luck we live in differend states or I'd press charges71.234.32.84 21:07, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

Apology accepted but i am still pissed. Mabey you should stop with the heavy duty deleting until you are an administrator.Ouijalover 00:46, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Why did you erase my entry to the directv channel list? GMC shows up as channel 1030 in my TiVo! And how is that considered "vandalism"? It was a legitimate entry! Just because your receiver shows one channel doesnt mean that mine can't show a different one! Christ I thought I was doing something nice by adding it, only to find out that I wasn't "contributing", I was vandalizing! I only did the test so that I made sure that it looked the same as the rest of the page. I'm going to put it back. Stop deleting things that are true.

[edit] RfA/Gurch

Thanks for your support – Gurch 17:37, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

Can't figure out how I'm a woodchuck, which means it's just as well that the edit was reverted. Thanks for the rollback on my user talk page. (I've been called a wooden f... Well, never mind that; I'm sure it was no one who knows me that well.) Geogre 22:44, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism to my user page

Thanks for reverting it! I didn't even notice until now! -- Chris Lester ^talk 09:16, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thank you!

[edit] Thanks for Supporting my RfA!

My Request for Adminship succeeded, by a count of 54/6/1. If you see me doing something I shouldn't, let me know. Thanks again, Ian Manka Talk to me! 00:34, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] RfA thanks!

Thanks for voting! Hello Mhking, and thank you so much for voting in my recent RfA. I am pleased to inform you that it passed with a final tally of (119/1/3), into the WP:100, so I have now been cleared for adminship and will soon be soaring above the clouds. I was overjoyed, shocked, and humbled by the tally, and, most importantly, all the support. Thank you. If there is ever anything you need, you know where you can find me. Take care.

--Pilot|guy 23:03, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

I just nominated you for administrator. I did it because I feel, even though you made me unhappy, you deserve it. If you do get it congratulationsOuijalover 23:28, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Dresden files

All i did was add bullet points. How is that considered vandalism?

[edit] RfA thanks

Thank you very much for your support for my recent RfA, which I'm quite happy to announce has passed with a consensus of 67 supporting, 0 opposed and 0 neutral. I'm glad you took the time to evaluate my candidacy, and I'll be working hard to justify the vote of confidence you've placed in me. Please let me know at my talk page if you need any admin-related assistance, or simply if you have any comments on my performance as an admin. Thanks! TheProject 02:12, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks for your support in my RfA!

Thanks for voting! Hello Mhking, and thanks for your support in my recent RfA. I'm pleased to announce that it passed with a final tally of (96/0/0). I was overwhelmed by all of the nice comments and votes of confidence from everyone. Thanks again, and see you around! OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:21, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] RE: Pokémon

A Minor note here: I don't think what we reverted can be considered vandalism. Sure, the information does not belong in the main Pokémon article, but it's more of a NPOV violation more than anything else. PCEevee ^talk 12:41, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs WTTV WCMH-TV W24AL List of Australian television presenters North American Sports Network WNET KTVI Fox Sports en Latinoamérica W55BM World Harvest Television ShopNBC Westwood One Former WCPX WJXT WTCN-CA God's Learning Channel W38CU Commonwealth Broadcasting Network

Cleanup Past Indiana's News Center WVTM-TV Merge GMC (General Motors division) Spanish International Network Tape delay (broadcasting) Add Sources ESPN2 Goosebumps CBS Mandate Wikify WBZ (AM) PBS idents Persona Inc. Expand Hughes Television Network KVDA IntelliStar

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 20:24, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Fox News

No problem, though I do tend to question how much good it will do. It seems like weekends really bring out the tenacious vandals. :) Digfarenough 21:56, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Legion

okay. if you feel that way, i guess you could restore the old article and add a redirect to Superman one. be bold and all that. Exvicious 01:33, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

You should probably change the first sentence back too. Exvicious 02:03, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Final state highway naming conventions debate

Mhking, your participation is welcome in the Wikipedia:State route naming conventions poll. Please give your input as to the process by 23:59 UTC on August 8.

Regards, Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 21:47, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Reverted to Vandalized version of Batman article

Just wanted to give you a heads-up that you reverted the Batman article back to a vandalized version of the article. 66.67.123.190 has been vandalizing the page recently and has been asked to stop their particular edits that "Batman is not a superhero..." which is clearly not the case here.--Cnjartist 21:34, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Interstate 285 and unbuilt interstate alignments...major edit

Remember to mark your edits as minor when, but only when, they genuinely are (see Wikipedia:Minor edit). Marking a major change as a minor one, or vice versa, is considered poor etiquette. The rule of thumb, is that an edit of a page that consists of spelling corrections, formatting, and minor rearranging of text should be flagged as a 'minor edit'. —C.Fred (talk) 18:45, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] hey

its a talk page thats what i am doing back off!!

[edit] Gary People

Well ok that is all I wanted to know Thank you very much,

I was just wondering for there are a few people who lived in Gary during there lifetime that even mention that they did in their article.

--MJHankel 19:25, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Openly Conservative

FYI - I don't disagree with your removal of the word "Openly" I only inserted it as a pre-emptive to try and stop someone removing the word "conservative" - which Medved openly and proudly is. Past experience has shown me that if someone is described factually as either "conservative" or liberal" - then someone else will construe its inclusion as having been a pejorative! I had been hoping to avoid that perception by people by stating that he was openly conservative... (as in not ashamed of it - and therefore not a pejorative.) So much for that! Davidpatrick 05:36, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Go raibh maith agat!

hoopydink^{Conas tá tú?} 08:41, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks Michael

Thanks Michael. I really appreciated your message. I'm quite relieved it's all over as it felt rather like being under a microscope. Please Michael, if you ever need any admin assistance with anything at all, don't hesitate to give me a yell. It was very nice to hear from you. :) Cheers, Sarah Ewart (Talk) 13:35, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Versus (TV channel)

Thanks for the help on what and what not to change from OLN to Versus. I was pretty confused on the issue. Thanks again! AWBricker 22:09, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Link spamming at Interstate Highway System

You may be interested to know that the edit you reverted at Interstate Highway System is being disputed: [1]

Calrog has been spamming many other pages under three IP addresses, and now with this new user account. Your input on external link spamming in general, and to the page reverted, would be greatly appreciated. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 14:40, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] User:205.188.117.74

User:205.188.117.74 is at it again. I had to revert several edits that included the usual addition of CMT Pure Country and several Starz networks, as well as WeatherScan (which I really wish they really DID add), and changing ToonDisney to Jetix. --myselfalso 20:46, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bridgemonkey

please don't remove AfD tags from active votes, thank you--64.12.117.9 17:58, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] External links

You removed some external links in the entries for the CSI shows, linking to www.crimelab.nl. According to policy for External Links, they fit, since content not integrated into the article is provided in a NPOV. According to an older mod edit it is ok to list one or two fansites if they adhere to this criteria so I don't see why it should be removed. The link was removed in a cleanup session by someone else earlier today and I placed them back as the link follows the policy. --Fogeltje 17:51, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

I apologize for troubling you with this, I reread the guidelines on external linking at it seems I overread something namely A page that you own or maintain, even if the guidelines above imply that it should be linked. While I do not own the site, I do maintain the site with the owner by keeping parts of the content (including CSI and CSI: NY (but not CSI: Miami)) up to date (even though I remain neutral as far as the content is concerned). Therefore the link should not have been added by me in the first place, but by a real neutral third party, even though I still believe it fits Wikipedia's NPOV and adds content not provided by Wikipedia. Sorry for wasting your time, I should read the guidelines more closely.--Fogeltje 20:51, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Prescription Cough Syrup

Page has been in creation for quite some time, just redirected from other pages.

[edit] Rod Foster

Hey Michael. I'm sorry about the abuse you've copped from User:Rod Foster. I have now blocked him. Please let me know if there are anymore problems. By the way, what was the name of the deleted article that he is on about? Best wishes, Michael, :) --Sarah Ewart (Talk) 14:38, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Given the recent vandalism to your userpage, would you like it s-protected so new accounts and IPs can't edit it? Sarah Ewart (Talk) 04:48, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] BET

I'm willing to talk about it, but it isn't vandalism. The channel most definitely is racist. What would you call something named "white entertainment television"? What would the NAACP call it? BET is racist, plain and simple, as it excludes other races. I think this is an important thing to remember and mention.

Please let me know your thoughts, I will refrain from editing further until we discuss this, out of respect for your opinion.

I'm going to have to ask you to change your tone. I'm talking this through instead of trying to force it through, and I've only reverted to my edit once, you and some anonymous user are the only ones who modified it. You need to acknowledge that in your tone and drop the threats. This cannot be a successful discussion if you don't stop making threats.

BET is not racist merely because of the name. It profiles racially, as it is intended for blacks, and not whites, and is racist in it's programming, showcasing black actors, musicians, etc, and not whites. This practice is racist, and I challenge you to claim otherwise. They make their decisions solely on race, with no other factors. There is no other word for this kind of practice.

I take it by your silence you agree and I should re-enter the edit? I've taken this to talk for several days now and no one seems to be offering a rebuttle. I'll give this one more day and then take the silence as concession.

Spanish language networks are not racist because, believe it or not, Spanish is a language not an ethnicity. Argentines are white, Mexicans Latino, Spanish European, and they all watch Spanish language programming because they are more comfortable seeing something in their native tongue because it is what they spoke first. Black is not a language.

You need to WP:AGF, I am not being obtuse, you are, and you are showing strong POV. Why would White Entertainment Television "would be geared toward and programmed toward a white supremacist crowd, and aimed at the exclusion of and subjugation of a particular racial group or groups". Does Black Entertainment Television serve the purpose of Black Supremacy... well yes, actually it does. Thank you for proving my point.

BET is racist in every sense of the word, Black people just don't like being reminded that they are as bigoted as everyone else.

[edit] D*

Hey, yeah, I noticed that. I made a few changes after the semiprotect. Good call to do that. --myselfalso 17:02, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] List of United States over-the-air television networks

Of course. Well, Bloomberg has at least 5 affiliates that i know of (one in NYC, 4 in california). HITN and HTV are also seen across the southern USA. I'm still trying to compile the affilates data for those two networks. RaccoonFox • Talk • Stalk 18:54, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

o.O??? You're not a jerk, my friend. I would have done the same thing in this situation. I even agree with your actions on removing them. I just thought that Bloomberg had its affiliates number put in. I guess that was my mistake. :) RaccoonFox • Talk • Stalk 18:55, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Jean-Michel Aulas

Hi, I've placed a {{holdon}} tag on J-M A. since he is a French football executive of some note and there is information in that VERY brief stub. I placed a "French football stub" on J-M A. and someone who is interested in French football can expand the stub. Cheers V. Joe 18:02, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Quick draw: Not to worry, I've been regularly included (sometimes with justification, more often not) of the same thing. Generally speaking, if the contributor is reasonable, she/he is more likely to address my deletion request or NOT deletion request with reason. People who are less reasonable either delete tags, ignore me completely, don't know enough about wikipedia to contest it... or go ape. Cheers V. Joe 18:06, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] List of DirecTV channels possible deletion

User:Blaxthos put the article up for deletion, not through AfD, but as a blatant violation of WP:NOT. Because of my contesting this, I removed the tag, as Blaxthos' deletion tag would've deleted the page within 5 days. --myselfalso 09:18, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

AfD discussion welcome. I had no idea there would be strong opposition -- notice on talk pages went unanswered for several days; that's why prod can be removed by anyone.  ;-)

You asked for reasoning regarding the deletion selection... Wikipedia should not try to be a collection of all information; this was recognized and codified in what Wikipedia is not. I encourage a narrow reading of what should be included in Wikipedia, for pragmatic as well as managerial concerns. In each case, these articles appear to be nothing more than lists of stations of TV, or television stations themselves... clearly a directory, which is explicitly covered in WP:NOT. No matter how useful the articles may be, they're outside the guidelines of inclusion. Perhaps there is a suitable transwiki home (or userspace, if all else fails)? /Blaxthos 15:37, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Obviously there is a lot of support to keep the articles. I listed them in good faith simply because of WP:NOT, and because I've seen articles become stale when their main shepphard moves on and they're left orphaned. In the channel listings case, perhaps we should stub off the main article, then? To answer your question, I would say "yes" regarding removing the other lists as well, given my druthers. I kinda gauge my views based on Britanica (my tried and true growing up) and the wikipedia guidelines/policies. Often I see policies ignored or subjugated with the "well if we follow policy this time we'll be opening a can of worms" argument (the old slippery slope). I'm definitely not in favor of the "we do it there, so it's okay here" and the "slippery slope" arguements, but obviously this is why we have discussions instead of giving just one user the power to delete anything. Appreciate the discussion. ;-) /Blaxthos 15:50, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sec Def

As you can see from my contributions, we are both on the same side. I have been reverting unconfirmed reports on the page. I only restored other mentions because an IP has deleted the categories, so I restored to one of the questionable edits. Gdo01 18:17, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Interstate 14/Qdub4lyfe

You seem to be fairly involved with this article, looking at the edit history. I see that you've reverted edits by Qdub4lyfe...many many many times. Just a warning to watch out for his edits again. Here's the Interstate 14 edit history. I don't know if action has been taken against him or his history, and this appears to be consistent and repetitive disruptive editing. I don't know where to go with him. Just a heads up. --MPD01605 (T / C) 22:03, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ontario Highway 17 Image

THANK YOU!!

• hope you didn't mind my edit; the TCH reference in the infobox cluttered it!

Bacl-presby 23:52, 17 November 2006 (UTC)