User talk:Eacz12
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
For any images I've uploaded adverts or advices, enter here
Contents |
[edit] Fair use images
Quoting item #9 of the Fair use criteria (WP:FUC):
- "Fair use images should be used only in the article namespace. Used outside article space, they are often enough not covered under the fair use doctrine. They should never be used on templates (including stub templates and navigation boxes) or on user pages."
You can't use these images on your user page, sorry. Combination 09:39, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Nightwish
Thanks for your contributions to the Nightwish article. I invite you to discuss in the talk page of that article the modifications you are doing. The article is a featured one, and the modifications you are doing may make it lose its status as the changes can be considered decorative by the Fair use criteria, point 8. Thank you. -- ReyBrujo 02:22, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Clearing your talk page
Just to let you know, it's generally considered bad form to remove content from your talk page without first archiving it, as you did with one of your previous discussions. Please see WP:ACM for more information on this matter. Thank you. --Carl (talk|contribs) 16:45, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
- I don't remember what I have deleted :S
[edit] Category:Evanescence images
Regarding your edit at the Evanescence category, as pointed above, the Fair use criteria indicates they can only be used in the article namespace. Thus, the NOGALLERY tag is needed in categories to prevent them visualizing in categories, which are not covered by the fair use criteria. Hopefully you will understand this. Good luck! -- ReyBrujo 21:30, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- K!
[edit] A fellow Evanescence fan I see...
Are you going to the concert? I had to buy my tickets on eBay for like $100!!! —Lantoka ( talk | contrib) 05:35, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
- How did u know I'm a fan!?!?! Well, i can't go to the concert cuz i live in Peru :S
-
- I knew based on your edits to Evanescence-related articles. =)
-
- OH MY GOD! They played tonight in Los Angeles, CA... let me just say, $100 well spent! I hear they're doing international tours... although I think it's just Europe. I hope they swing by Peru sometime so you can go! And Amy Lee is still as awesome as ever.
[edit] Hey
Images are being deleted because they do not pass the first fair use criterion. I will continue to nominate files for deletion that do not pass all fair use criteria. You can check out the policy here. As for your question about the images on my user page, they aren't even fair use images. If you actually went into each image description, you'd see they have a free use license. I gave them that license because I am the photographer of them. There is a world of difference between a fair use image and a free use image. Roguegeek (talk) 01:52, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
- That admin was correct. Fair use images of any type are not allowed on user pages. Roguegeek (talk) 01:57, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
-
- It's not a matter of the subject. My images are free use because I created them and offered them as free to use. Promotional material is, generally, not free use. The owner of those images did not grant free use of those images unless you can get them to say so. Promotional images are fair use then, but it still doesn't pass Wikipedia's definition of fair use unless it meets all fair use criteria. It can only pass the first fair use criterion if no free use images could possibly be created or found. A free use image of Amy Lee does exist here, therefore, all Amy Lee images that are fair use will fail here in Wikipedia. I can explain more, but not right now. The criteria can explain this more clearly and completely. Roguegeek (talk) 02:20, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Oye
Compadre,
Ya luché por el derecho de incluir imágenes de la banda. La verdad es que las políticas de Wikipedia no permiten el uso de imágenes mientras el autor todavía tiene derechos a menos que tengamos TODOS LOS CRITERIOS para incluirlo. En el caso de un imágen de toda la banda, no tenemos el criterio que dice que "es muy difícil usar un imágen gratis"; Evanescence es muy popular y la gente ha tenido muchas oportunidades sacar fotografías de la banda. Yo no estoy de acuerdo con este político porque es pésimo para nuestro artículo, pero ya lo ha estado discutido. No creo que podemos ganar. Ya creo que es mejor salir de la disputa y continuar a mejorar el artículo sobre Evanescence en otras maneras. —Lantoka ( talk | contrib) 22:55, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
- Pues, parece que Huntster ha resolvido el problema. Una solución para todos. Qué bueno. =) —Lantoka ( talk | contrib) 23:01, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] No personal attacks
Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Roguegeek (talk) 01:31, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Extra tracklisting
Firstly, I want to appologise for being rude. I would like to let you know that I have nominated for deletion the template {{Extra song version}}. The "altAlbum" field has been changed on {{Extra tracklisting}} - and since only you and I know about it - could you tell me where it's been used? Thanks --Ashadeofgrey (talk • contribs) 10:49, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks! You're a star. I can't believe you're working so hard on the Evanescence articles (the only song i like is "My Immortal"). But nevertheless, thank you and I'm glad we've got a compromise ;).--Ashadeofgrey (talk • contribs)
