Il censimento di Quirinio e i Vangeli

Da Wikipedia, l'enciclopedia libera.

Questa voce riguardante un argomento di storia non è ancora stata tradotta completamente dalla lingua inglese. Se puoi, terminala o riscrivila tu, eliminando il testo in lingua straniera quando hai finito. Traduzione iniziata in settembre 2006 • Vedi le altre voci da tradurre dalla stessa lingua e dello stesso argomento. Nota: se non vedi il testo da tradurre, potrebbe essere nascosto: fai clic su modifica per visualizzarlo. Prima di salvare la pagina, non dimenticare di eliminare o spostare i segni <!-- e --> che delimitano il testo da nascondere.

Non usare traduttori automatici!

Il Censimento di Publio Sulpicio Quirinio altro non era se non la registrazione (apographai) della provincia romana della Siria e della Giudea (che includeva Samaria, Giudea e Idumea), con obiettivi fiscali durante il regno dell'imperatore romano Augusto. Il Vangelo di Luca fa coincidere questo censimento con la nascita di Gesù. Esistono delle contraddizioni tra il racconto di Luca e quello di Giuseppe Flavio, così come con il racconto del Vangelo di Matteo che hanno dato luogo ad un dibattito. La questione centrale concerne l'attendibilità storica dei vangeli, infallibità della Bibbia, e più in generale la cosìdetta cronologia di Gesù.

Entrambe i vangeli di Luca e Matteo collocano la nascita di Gesù sotto il regno di Erode il Grande. Luca descrive gli eventi che accadono sotto il governatorato di Quirinio, e che riguardano il primo censimento delle province di Siria e Gidea. Giuseppe Flavio colloca il governatorato e il censimento nell'anno 6 d.C., piuttosto distante dalla morte di Erode il Grande (4 a.C.). Il dibattito, perciò, si è focalizzato sulla possibilità di riconciliare questa contraddizione ipotizzando un precedente governatorato di Quirinio in Siria o, alternativamente, ipotizzando un censimento precedente. Se la riconcilizione non fosse possibile si deve concludere che una delle fonti non dice il vero. Inoltre, un altra questione che è stata introdotta nel dibattito riguarda la struttura grammaticale del resoconto di Luca, che potrebbe fare pensare a delle interpolazioni o a delle traduzioni scorrette, ai calcoli astrologici che si riferiscono alla Stella di Betlemme, alla corretta interpretazione delle iscrizioni antiche, e ad altre varie questioni.

Indice 1 Fonti 2 Attempts at solutions 2.1 Two governorships of Quirinius 3 Roman Censuses 4 Note 5 Collegamenti esterni

[modifica] Fonti

Le fonti riguardo gli eventi discussi sono i vangeli di Luca e Matteo, entrambi dei racconti biografici della vita di Gesù, e le Antichita giudaiche di Giuseppe Flavio (un lavoro composto da più volumi sulla storia degli ebrei)

I vangelo di Luca riporta:

In quei giorni un decreto di Cesare Augusto ordinò che si facesse il censimento di tutta la terra. Questo primo censimento fu fatto quando era governatore della Siria Quirinio. Andavano tutti a farsi registrare, ciascuno nella sua città. Anche Giuseppe, che era della casa e della famiglia di Davide, dalla città di Nàzaret e dalla Galilea salì in Giudea alla città di Davide, chiamata Betlemme, per farsi registrare insieme con Maria sua sposa, che era incinta. Ora, mentre si trovavano in quel luogo, si compirono per lei i giorni del parto. Diede alla luce il suo figlio primogenito, lo avvolse in fasce e lo depose in una mangiatoia, perché non c'era posto per loro nell'albergo. (Luke 2:1-7)

Luca reccaonta anche della gravidanza di Maria contemporary with that of her relative Elizabeth (Template:Bibleverse), whose own pregnancy had occurred "in the days of Herod, King of Judea" (Template:Bibleverse). Hence Luke places the governing of Quirinius as roughly contemporary to the reign of Herod the Great. This corresponds with the account of the Gospel of Matthew, which likewise places the birth of Jesus under the reign of Herod the Great (Template:Bibleverse). According to most historians, Herod's rule ended upon his death in 4 B.C.,^[1] likely in late March or early April, based on astrological reconstructions of a lunar eclipse mentioned by Josephus as coinciding with the event,^[2] although a minority argue for alternative dates.^[3]

Matthew, besides placing the birth of Jesus under the reign of Herod the Great, also recorded that Herod had all the male children in Bethlehem two years old and younger executed (Matthew 2:16, see Slaughter of the Innocents), based on a prophecy relayed to him by the three magi that a new king of the Jews had been born in the town. The order's instruction of "two and under", along with the inference that it took Herod time to realize the magi were not about to deliver the youth to him, implies a date of 6-4 B.C. as the latest possible dating.

Josephus recorded that Quirinius, a Roman senator and governor of Syria, along with an equestrian assistant named Coponius, who was assigned as governor of Iudaea Province after the exile of Herod Archelaus, successor to Herod the Great, were assigned to conduct a tax census for the Emperor.^[4] Josephus also stated that Archelaus was exiled ten years after his reign began,^[5] and that Quirinius conducted a census after this, in the thirty-seventh year since the Battle of Actium, which places the event at A.D. 6.^[6]

Tacitus, in his Annals, gives an obituary for Quirinius (Annals 3.48), though the passage is unfortunately silent on the essentials of the events in question. [1]

[modifica] Attempts at solutions

[modifica] Two governorships of Quirinius

One possible reconciliation of the sources is to posit a second governorship of Quirinius in Syria during 4 B.C., when another (the "first") census took place. There is no direct evidence for this, although partial evidence has been given as support.

Sentius Saturninus was provincial governor in Syria from 9 to 6 B.C., followed by Publius Quintilius Varus, who according to Josephus led a force against a revolt in Judea after Herod's death, which would mean he was an authority in Judea until at least April of 4 B.C. After Varus it is not known who was governing Syria from 4 to 1 B.C. Hence, if Quirinius did serve as governor of the province twice, it would have to have been during this time, unless Quirinius served as co-ruler of the province (perhaps in a capacity similar to that of Coponius, below). Varus did show ineptitude as a governor later, in A.D. 9, when he suffered a devastating defeat in the Teutoberg forest. There is mention of Quirinius in the East on military functions.^[7] Though rare, the use of two governing authorities was used by Rome in Africa under Caligula, and also in Palestine during Vespasian's campaigns. Josephus also mentioned a dual-governing of Volumnius and Sentius Saturninus in Syria from 9 to 6 B.C., although certain interpretations dispute this.^[8]

The Greek word used by Luke, hegemoneuontos (ηγεμονευοντος; root: hegemon), was used in ancient Greek to refer to varying forms of "governing", and could apply to other contexts of wielding authority besides the specific office of provincial governor, contexts fitting for Quirinius throughout his notable career. Nonetheless, the position of Quirinius would have to be sufficiently notable to warrant its mentioning by Luke in association with the census.

An inscription, known as the Lapis Tiburtinus, reads: "proconsul asiam provinciam opti… divi augusti iterum syriam et pho…" [2] Translated it reads: "Proconsul obtained the province Asia Minor… of the divine Augustus a second time in Syria…" This text, which is damaged (missing section represented above by "…"), could mean either that an individual held office in Syria twice, or simply that he held office twice in two different provinces. The stone bearing the inscription was found near the villa of Quintillus Varus, leading to speculation that he is the intended subject. In any case, there is no specific evidence that the text refers to Quirinius.

Two other inscription stones, commemorating the career of another Roman politician, both mention that this Roman held a duoviri, or rule as dual magistrate, along with Quirinius in a city near Galatia. Dating the inscriptions is difficult, but the time in question is plausible. However, the city in question likely was beyond the domain of a Syrian provincial governor. The more general application of hegemon could account for a wider range of authority.

A further, funerary inscription, known as the Aemilius Secundus, follows the career of a solider who served under Quirinius "Caesar's legate in Syria". The text chronologically recounts the events of the life of Aemilius, placing a census "of 117 thousand citizens" before the military campaigns of Quirinius in the north of Syria, events that occurred c. 4 to 6 B.C. The census, however, only mentions "citizen" (i.e. Romans, not Jews) in the city of Apamea, but it is consistent with the hypothesis that Quirinius conducted censuses while militarily governing in Syria before his provincial governorship.

Tacitus did not mention the governing of a province twice in his obituary of Quirinius (see above), though he did briefly mention his military endeavours in the East.^[9]

The Jesus Seminar's Scholars Version translation notes for Luke 2:2: "Quirinius was governor of Syria in 6-7 C.E. The problem of how to reconcile the chronology of 2:2 with 1:5 (Herod died in 4 B.C.E) has defied solution."

[modifica] Roman Censuses

The occurrence of Roman censuses is only partially attested to in the historical sources. Evidence for them includes the occasional mentioning in a history, the archaeological discovery of papyri records in arid climates like Egypt, and certain inscriptions. Often, a census will only be mentioned in one ancient text (for example, only Josephus mentioned directly the census of A.D. 6).

Augustus is known to have had an interest in the collection of census data on his empire. He is known to have taken a census of Roman citizens at least three times, in 28 B.C., 8 B.C., and A.D. 14.^[10] There is also evidence that censuses were taken at regular intervals during his reign, at least in the provinces of Egypt and Sicily, important because of their wealthy estates and supply of grain. Furthermore, the censuses in Egypt were based on the Egyptian, rather than Roman, calendar.^[11] Additionally there is the census in Judea mentioned by Josephus in A.D. 6 (see above). Orosius mentioned another census in 3 B.C., and Josephus records a mandatory "oath of obedience" to Augustus required in Judea at a similar time, which involved the erecting of statues to the emperor.^[12] Josephus also mentions that, after the death of Herod, some pleaded with Archelaus for their "taxes to be reduced", a sign of tax pressure in the area prior to A.D. 6.^[13]

Certain official enrolment papers have been discovered in Palestine, regularly taken from no later than A.D. 20 to the time of Emperor Constantine, which includes information on each family based on the testimony of the head of household. These are unknown to the historical sources.

Generally an imperial census was not conducted in a Roman client kingdom, though it did infrequently occur. Josephus records that relations between King Herod and Rome were poor.^[14] Of course the area had been subject to many Roman military campaigns and tribute payment, beginning with Pompey in 48 B.C., and it is not unfair to characterize Herod largely as a Roman puppet. A Zealots tax revolt accompanied the taxation of Judea in A.D. 6, which drew the attention of Joesphus. This has given rise to the speculation that, if there were an earlier enrolment in 4 B.C., it would likely have evoked the same response and subsequent attention of Josephus, unless this enrolment did not involve immediate taxation (such as implied by the enrolment papers mentioned above).

The census as recorded by Luke is in accord with Jewish, rather than Roman administrative customs, requiring enrolment based on ancestral tribe rather than current location (Luke 2:3-4). Although, even Roman citizens enrolled according to tribe at times. It is known that the Roman Empire did retain certain local tax enrolment customs for non-citizens at times, for example in Sicily. There is also a hint in Josephus that Herod was required to give a tally of his populace by local groupings.^[15] Lastly, that a census could require travel is known from certain papyri.^[16] On the other hand, the Jesus Seminar's Scholars Version translation notes for Luke 2:3-4: "This procedure for a census is unattested in ancient sources."

[modifica] Note

[modifica] Collegamenti esterni

• (EN) Antichità giudaiche di Giuseppe Flavio, 18

Scettici:

• (EN) La data della natività in Luca
• (EN) Putting Luke 2:2 in context
• (EN) Su Erode e Quirinio

Apologetici:

• (EN) Quando avvenne il censimento riportato da Luca?
• (EN) The seekers' guide to the Bible: The Census
• (EN) Il censimento di Quirinio: storicità di Luca 2:1-5