Wikipedia:Generala Debato
From Wikipedia
Uzez ica pagino por irga sugesto e debato pri generala aferi pri Wikipedio.
Anciena debato esas movata aden arkivo.
Por faciligar la debati generala, anke la Yahoo-forumo ido-wikipedio esas uzata.
Por abonar irez a http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ido-wikipedio/
o sendez vakua mesajo a ido-wikipedio-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Por membreso di la forumo es bezonata pregar aprobo (kontre-spamala agado).
Pro ke Wikipedio funcionez maxim bone, on devas sempre skribar kelka vorti e frazi importanta samamaniere. On povas skribar ank en sua propra maniero, ma la ligili bezonas unformeso. Memorez, ke omna manieri esas chanjebla, ma nun ula chanjo esus tre laboriginta, pro ke nia Wikipedio esas ja multa-pagina. - Artomo
Indexo |
[redaktar] Rubriki di pagini
En rubriki preferesas singularo. La skribanto dil texto devus unesme klarifar ed explikar la kazo o nociono mencionita en rubriko e lore singularo esas plu bona. Quankam ulatempe pluralo esas plu bona en rubriko. - Artomo
[redaktar] Streketo en rubriki
Se rubriko kontenas kompozita vorto (kompozajo), esus bona uzar streketo inter la parti. Tale ni esas polita e helpanta por lernanti di Ido. En normala texto on povas skribar sen streketo ma ligilizante ta vorto per kramponi on mustas memorar, ke la rubriko di la pagino kontenas streketo. - Artomo
[redaktar] Propra nomi
Propra nomi esas importanta por Wikipedio ed on mustas ligilizar li. Nun uzesas en texti formulizuro Prenomo Familio-nomo. Tale on ne devas ponderar pri nekonocata nomo, quo esas parto di familiala nomo. Suficas, ke skribanto adjuntos kramponi che propra nomi kreante ligilo. Regretinde tala ordino esas nebona en pagino di omna pagini. Pro lo esas importanta, ke skribanti kategoriizas pagini. Se ulu skribas pri ula homo, ca skribanto generale savas, qua parto en propra nomo esas familiala nomo, do uzinda en enciklopediala listi. - Artomo
[redaktar] Ordinala nombri
Dati esas importanta por funcionanta Wikipedio. Nun uzesas formulizuro X di monato en pagini pri ula dio (dato). Do ne Xma, qua esus plu Idala. Altralatere 1-esma, 2-esma, 8-esma, 10-esma abrevius nulo, 3-esma, 5-esma, 6-esma, 7-esma, 9-esma abrevius nur un signo e 4-esma du signi. Se ulu volas uzar formulizuro Xma di monato en sua texto, on povas ligilizar, por exemplo, tale: [[8 di marto|8ma di marto]]. En nomi di regnanti uzesas abreviuro Xma, exemple, Louis 14ma. - Artomo
[redaktar] Expliko inter parentezi che ligilo
La nomi di reji, regnanti e tala personi di diversa landi havas ula-foye sama formo. Tatempe esas bezonata explikar pri quo lando o stato on skribas. Uzez tala formulizuro: [[Louis 14ma (Francia)|Louis 14ma]], ma ne, por exemplo, [[Louis 14ma di Francia|Louis 14ma]] o [[Louis 14ma de Francia|Louis 14ma]]. – Atencez ke on povas skribar anke kurte [[Louis 14ma]]. Se existas altra rejo sama-nomala, on povas pose separar li uzante la pagino pri homonimeso. – Artomo 23:19, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC).
[redaktar] Yarcenti
Omna rubriki pri yarcenti havas formilizuro Xma yar-cento. - Artomo
[redaktar] Ante Kristo
Yari referanta tempo ante Kristo havas abreviaturo aK, do sen punti. En moderna linguo punti semblas superflua. La yari pos Kristo ne havas abreviuro pK, ma se ulu volas o texto bezonas l' abreviuro pK, on ne mustas juntar pK inter ligilizebla kramponi. - Artomo
[redaktar] Falsa vorti
Se vu trovas nekorekta vorto en Idala texto, juntez ol a listo pri sugestata vorti kun korekta formo. Tale la nedezirata vorto-formo ne esos repetita ed omnu povas chanjar olu. On povas trovar ula vorto-formo skribante che frontispico en buxeto la vorto e kliktante “serchar”. - Artomo
[redaktar] Extera ligili
Me trovis en reto multalinguala ligilaro en qua on povas trovor extera reto-situi uzebla por Wikipediala pagini. Vizitez http://dmoz.org/ . - Artomo
[redaktar] Ido interwikis where they're not wanted
Hi,
Not that I am a strong anti Ido personality or something like that, but it irritates me that on a lot of smaller Wikipedias the Ido interwiki is added to the local Main Page. This is OK when the list of interwikis is quite complete, but it is unasked for when the margin features only a few interwikis, usually the languages closest related to the local language and those that have some sort of relevance towards it in terms of proximity or being a major culture language. To be quite specific: at the Tok Pisin Wikipedia, there are only interikis to the English, Simple English, Indonesian, Malayan, Chinese, Javan, Sundanese, Japanese and German Wikipedias. An interwiki to io: would be completely out of place, yet someone placed it in. Please stop that, it is sheer spam! Caesarion 17:20, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
- Ido is the second international language and expect to become the first soon by the only force of its intrinsic value so it certainly deserve to have a very prominent place and certainly among the world top ten. Fafnir 19:58, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
- Caesarion - the link was added by someone in Spain, so it's hard to say who did it - certainly not one of us. I also helped you out with the other spam on your main page. Mithridates 23:20, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
- Ok, thank you Mithridates, I really hope it was not one of you, but it just seemed so likely... anyway Fafnir, your position is quite POV, as Ido is just spoken by a few 1000 speakers. How many people have heard of it at all? Even an interwiki to the Esperanto mean page would be highly doubtful, I think. (btw. most spam on that main page is much, much worse than this Ido interwiki, it's true) Caesarion 17:38, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
- Since there are so few Ido speakers and even available computer translator making it quite virtual for now it's why I said "intrinsic". Fafnir 19:12, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
- Ok, thank you Mithridates, I really hope it was not one of you, but it just seemed so likely... anyway Fafnir, your position is quite POV, as Ido is just spoken by a few 1000 speakers. How many people have heard of it at all? Even an interwiki to the Esperanto mean page would be highly doubtful, I think. (btw. most spam on that main page is much, much worse than this Ido interwiki, it's true) Caesarion 17:38, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
[redaktar] Question
Could this page be considered as the Ido Village Pump (en) or Bistro (fr)? Hégésippe | ±Θ± 16:36, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
- As you see in the log there are very few participants so this wikipedia is a kind of "shadow boat", totally opposed to esperanto which is a weaker language but with an important community. Fafnir 21:55, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
- Um...I think what he means is 'yes'. *^^* We're kind of like doozers over here so I never really noticed the discussion area. Mithridates 09:16, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
[http://www.rsr.ch/view.asp?DomID=1895&clickedDate=06/14/2006#mercredi Rêver les langues par Marina Yaguello, Les langues imaginaires, éd. du Seuil]
