Talk:Yasuhiro Ishimoto
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ] | ||
 |
Yasuhiro Ishimoto is part of WikiProject Japan, a project to improve all Japan-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Japan-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome. |
|
Japan To-do:
|
|
 |
This page is within the scope of WikiProject History of photography, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles on the history of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. |
[edit] "the American tradition of photography" and its domination
I'm a little puzzled to read that: While in the USA his photography was influenced by Harry Callahan. On returning to Japan, he again won numerous prizes for photography. He thus established himself as a key bridge, by which the American tradition of photography would enter and quickly dominate Japanese post-war photography. While I must confess that I don't know that much about Ishimoto offhand, I vaguely remember his book Chicago Chicago and I also vaguely remember seeing stuff by Callahan, and I can think of little that the two have in common beyond their use of B/W (which anyway was ubiquitous). First, which American tradition would this be? Secondly, I wouldn't call Cartier-Bresson's work a (let alone the) French tradition, but I'd have thought that CB's work would have had more impact than that of Adams, Lange, Bourke-White, or similar. Though CB's work (or work like it) had had an impact from before the war. If we're talking about more personal stuff, notably the less sensational aspects of Araki's work, then whether or not it's a distinctively American tradition I think it came a lot later. -- Hoary 03:02, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
- The reason is simpler than this phrasing suggests - Callahan taught Ishimoto. But the phrasing is now completely altered, since I've expanded the article. Pinkville 20:53, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
- And the absurd assertion: "the American tradition of photography would enter and quickly dominate Japanese post-war photography" hasn't survived the changes, thankfully.
- I should add that there is some affinity artistically between Callahan's photography, in views such as this, and Ishimoto's photographs of Katsura rikyū. Pinkville 01:38, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] "the official version"
We read: On graduating from High School, in 1946 he went to study in the USA, where he won numerous photography prizes and graduated from the Illinois Institute of Technology and the Art Institute of Chicago (1948-1952) That is the official version. What does "official" mean in this context, and where does this version appear? On p.50 of Works by 25 Photographers in Their 20s (catalogue of an exhibition held at Kiyosato Museum of Photographic Arts in 1995, and the source for my additions about his youth), Ishimoto writes that he went back to the US before the war, where he was interned. -- Hoary 04:27, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
- This is an article I've been meaning to get to as well. This passage really bothered me when I first saw it some months ago. there's no controversy about Ishimoto being interned, as far as I know. I have even seen a photograph he took at the camp where he was interned. Pinkville 13:24, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
You've certainly got to it, 'Ville. Well done! -- Hoary 10:34, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks. Thanks also for your additions (especially kana titles, which I didn't have). Re: your note about italics/quotation marks, that sounds fine to me - I had tried to make the distinction using square brackets for translations of titles (not appearing on the book itself), but quotation marks are also good. Pinkville 19:00, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Influence
The first thing we read about Ishimoto is that he has been influential. However, the article doesn't explain this. I really don't have a clue about any influence he may have had. Could somebody elucidate? -- Hoary 10:34, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
- Ha, that's true. It's the only phrase I retained from the original! I'll see what I can do to elucidate. Pinkville 18:48, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
I've just got hold of Szarkowski and Yamagishi, New Japanese Photography; a lot of the odd-sounding material seems to come from that. I'll read it soon and see if I can make better sense of it. -- Hoary 11:10, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
