Talk:Vozvrashcheniye
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Films, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to films and film characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | ||||||
|
|||||||
|
Editing Guidelines
|
|||||||
- not revealing details to leave something "intriguing" is one of the weakest/cheapest ways to make a movie, and it is faux-interesting and pseudo -intellectual. More interesting and intriguing is to have many details and to have them all fit together in myriad ways. I'm not saying you cannot enjoy this film, but don't claim that it's shortcomings are strengths: anybody can make a two hour film of nothing, and that is rarely intriguing.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.174.107.130 (talk • contribs) .
-
- Ehh, that's maybe 'cause you have seen too many Hollywood movies spelling everything out. 'Vozvrashcheniye' is anything but empty. Igorrr 10:26, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Symbolism
Subtext is always open to interpretation 'course, but without a reference the symbolism section seems like original research. An encyclopedia isn't the place to theorize how movies could be explained either way, and have thus added an unreferenced tag to the section. Igorrr 10:26, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
