User talk:VegettoEX

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents 1 It's been a far time since, but thanks... 2 Yo~ 3 Nice work 4 Coola reverts 5 And not that this'll change anything, but... 6 I know you don't sign on that much ~~ 7 Clearing out vandals 8 Links 9 Um... sir?

[edit] It's been a far time since, but thanks...

... for contributing to the Coola article. Having spent *considerable* time overhauling that page (synopsis and story were... well, fairly damned abominable), I was surprised to see you lend a hand yourself, chiefly because I used your revamp on Tullece as my base. I thought of using the Dragon Ball daizenshuu gifs of Coola from Daizex in my original edit, but thought that'd be akin to stealing your layout. 'Course, you providing them made things THAT MUCH easier.

One thing of note though - I had wanted to give the names of Coola's cronies and any puns behind them, but unfortunately I'm lacking when it comes to translations. Any way of adding these - if any - to Coola's page?

Thanks again for your help in improving the article. Papacha 08:09, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

• Eep. Managed to download episode #0007 of the podcast, I'll see what I can glean from it, though I can't promise anything quite as in-depth. So your assistance would probably still be very kosher. At least I've got grounds for a start. Papacha 11:47, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Yo~

Thanks so much for enjoying the site and such :). I've gone in and thrown the henchmen section in the Coola page. I'm not sure about its placement on the page; it makes sense to me to include it below Coola's own name pun, but it's weird having it ABOVE the movies they're in... but it still feels like it's the most appropriate space for it. I'm not married to it, but my suggestion is probably to keep it where it is.

Thanks for being so great with regards to the Zarbon nonsense, too!

[edit] Nice work

Zarbon... Y'know they say taste is relative, but I swear that guy's is inbred. Sheesh. Anyway, I merged what I had in my revamp to what you had added previously in the article, and I think it came out nicely. I agree it looks a bit off where it sits now too, but yeah, it's the most rightful place. Hopping to the next villain I've started overhauling Garlic Jr., 'cause goodness knows not many a fanboy is touchin' *that* place. Oy.

Thanks for the romanizations and Japanese characters; I'd of been at a loss without them. Papacha 14:08, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Coola reverts

Went ahead and changed it back. User w/ the same IP made his own special adjustments to the Tullece page as well, also taken care of for the time being.

Ai-friggin'-yah. Papacha 09:17, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] And not that this'll change anything, but...

Is there anything in the daizenshuu about the linearity of Freeza and his family's power structure? More of a podcast question, but dude, myself and others are going round-and-round with Zarbon on Freeza Family Tree on the issue, and while some of the more rampant silliness has been stunted (Broli is a member of Freeza's army!) the rest is for naught. He being the article's creator only makes editing more of a chore.

They'd probably be prey to a roll-back, but I'm interested to know, because as far as I know Toriyama and Toei never really dove into the subject. Papacha 10:05, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] I know you don't sign on that much ~~

But it's worth a shot. Third opinions are wanted from various contibuting editors to DragonBall articles to receive help and third opinion on a dispute between Zarbon and myself on the List of Frieza Related Characters in Dragon Ball. And lucky, lucky, you just so happen to be one, and an authority at that. ^_^ Any input/discussion on the matter would be greatly appreciated. Papacha 15:10, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Clearing out vandals

Thanks for removing part of the kiddy vandalism, but I had to do another revert over your own to reintroduce a lost section back into the article. Just wanted you to know the reason why. Voice of Treason 00:06, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Links

I noticed you provide direct links to your site's homepage within articles and in the External Links sections. You shouldn't do that anymore, and remove the ones you placed. Wikipedia is not a place to promote your own personal site. If you want to use it for reference, link directly to the page that has the reference. Not the homepage.--KojiDude 03:47, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Yo. I don't add links to my site. Other people do. I'm not about to remove it if someone else put it there, and I'm certainly not going anywhere and adding my own site in any article what-so-ever. I'm somewhat offended that you'd even think that; Daizenshuu EX is well above that kind of petty nonsense. VegettoEX 20:25, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

If what you say is true, then explain this edit I reverted. Also, all of the articles on the list on your userpage coincidently had a link to your homepage somewhere in there. I'm just saying, I had every right to assume it was you, and I didn't intend to offend you.--KojiDude 05:17, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Please do the research before making the assumptions. Go back further in the revision history for that page. The link was already there. I just edited around it. Apparently someone found my site of enough authority that they wanted to cite it, so I left that in and just wrote around it. The reason I edit ANY pages here is generally because I follow a link to it from my web referrals, and I see grossly inaccurate information. I can tell you that I did link my site on the Super Dragonball Z page (a link you removed), where I was directly citing some piece of specific information; you'll see the citation in the article in addition to the bottom of the page (that's why it's a reference, and not a normal external link). And then you've got cases like the Freeza article, which I've never touched in my life, and you still decided to remove it. I understand the reasonings on that one, but I fail to understand why you didn't just edit it to what you're literally typing right there on the page that it should be edited to. It seems like a very unfocused and unresearched personal attack. Again, I can understand your logical reasonings behind it, but I'm flabbergasted as to why you didn't just look further back in the revision histories... Let me know if you need anything else. Cheers.VegettoEX 7:08, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

It wasn't a personal attack, it was a notice. I didn't go that far into the history because, as you can see, it was 3:47 in the morning. I apologize for making assumptions, but I'm greatly offended that you would consider following Wikipedia policy a personal attack.--KojiDude 19:42, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

I was only verging on considering it a personal attack because, and consider this from my perspective, every page that contained a link to my site that other people had put the citation for was being removed. I'm glad all is well, and I hope that looking through my contributions, you can see I have more than every well-meaning intention in the fandom of DB, and have so for years upon years. VegettoEX 18:01, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Um... sir?

I hope that rant on my discussion page was directed toward SilentRage and not myself, as I never said anything about you. In fact, to quote Mr. Rage's own discussion page, "I actually don't listen to podcasts, nor care what people say about me". The S 15:02, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for clarifying. I was literally saying to myself "Jesus Christ... why do I get dragged into every feud related to Daizenshuu EX?" The S 23:58, 24 October 2006 (UTC)