User talk:UCF Cheerleader

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, UCF Cheerleader, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Johntex\^talk 01:41, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

I'm considering deleting Housewife Bangers because it does not seem notable enough for inclusion in Wikipedia. What makes this porn series special?

Do you have any more information that would make it notable. For example: sales figures, number of productions, house-hold name actors...? Do you appear in any of the films or are you associated with the company? Please reply with more informaiton so we can consider keeping the article. Johntex\^talk 01:40, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Hi! Well, you seem to be doing well for someone who is writing their first article. You know some wiki-markup and you found WP:ANI in a hurry. Are you sure you haven't editted here before? I don't know the answer to your question on Nicole Sheridan though I did take a guess back at ANI. Have you ever thought about doing porn?

Great abs, great hair! I'll be glad to help you expand the article if the series is truly notable and if you have good information from reliable sources. (Please see WP:CITE, WP:RS, and WP:V for more on this.) AVN should be OK as a source for a porn article. Are you interested in college football? I am assumign UCF is University of Central Florida? Johntex\^talk 01:51, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Opps, sorry. I guess I did not read your WP:ANI post carefully. I see no justification for the tag, so I have removed it. Thanks for pointing it out! Johntex\^talk 01:55, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Check on it.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Check on it.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}. If you have not already done so, please also include the source of the image. In many cases this will be the website where you found it.

Please specify the copyright information and source on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 02:05, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Yes, but you need to add something other than "full license", as that term is legally meaningless. Please add either {{GFDL-self}}, {{PD-self}}, or other applicable free-use license to the photograph. There's no need to get irate, Wikipedia policy on image copyright is very finnicky. ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 02:11, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Sure, I am going to edit Image:Check on it.jpg and include "{{GFDL-presumed}}". This is a tag that indicates the image is released under the terms of the GFDL. To confirm this, please add "{{GFDL-self}}" to Image:Check on it.jpg. Thanks, and good luck in Wikipedia ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 02:17, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Never mind, looks like you've got a handle on it ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 02:18, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Yes, we have had to become very strict about images. Too many people are just uploading whatever. So, we have these scripts that look for one of the proper tags. If none of them are found, then the image gets flagged, no matter what text you have typed. Technically, some might say that you don't own the license to that photo, the photographer does. I recommend you just remove the part about a friend taking it. It's a shame that we have to be so strict. I understand the reason for it but it is a pain in the ass.

I was almost sure that you must have used Wikipedia before. I found your first article completely by accident. I was making an argument on our policy page and I hit the "random article" button just to come up with an article to use as an example in the debate. It just happened to be your brand new article, created by a brand new user. Long experience has taught me these articles usually need help at the best, or may be vandalism at the worst. That is why I left you a message.

You didn't mention if you like college football, but if you are a cheerleader from UCF as I am guessing we have a ton of articles on college football that you might be interested in. I am a member of Wikipedia:WikiProject_College_football and I've created articles like Vince Young and 2005 Texas Longhorn football team and War Chant. Later. Johntex\^talk 03:02, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] To answer your question...

...yup. Guilty as charged. Greatest job in the universe and I am the luckiest guy on the face of the planet.

• Yes I am. I'm doing well, how are you? Having fun? Johntex\^talk 23:28, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

• I'd be glad to help you learn those ropes - and I'll be happy to help with Wikipedia as well.  :-) In return, perhaps you could teach me some things about Britain's Electoral Reforms of 1832? Johntex\^talk 04:15, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Kendall Coffey

This article was a non-notable biography according to the criteria set out in WP:BIO. (aeropagitica) 05:06, 20 October 2006 (UTC)