Talk:Tessy Antony
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| Stub | This article has been rated as stub-Class on the Project's quality scale. [FAQ] (If you rated the article, please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
||
 |
This article is supported by the Royalty and nobility work group. | ||
 |
Tessy Antony is within the scope of WikiProject Luxembourg, a collaboration intended to improve the coverage of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg at the English language Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page.. |
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. |
| Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. |
[edit] Spelling
- Is it Anthony or Antony ? I have seen both spellings. Hektor 16:26, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Succession
- Does anyone know whether or not the baby will be in the Luxembourg list of succession. Hektor 16:26, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
-
- Probably not. I don't think illegitamte children are allowed in the line of succession. Unless the baby is legitimized, he or she probably won't be and chances are, won't have a title either. Morhange 17:58, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Problems
This article has several problems:
- It is entirely unsourced.
- Its subject is non-notable.
- Its subject is not a member of any royal house; therefore the stub is incorrect.
I rm the inappropriate stub; I'm tempted to prod the whole thing, but I'll leave it alone in hopes it may be improved and its subject be shown to have some notability. John Reid 23:32, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
-
- Added a source from a Luxembourgish (is that right, ha) online paper. Morhange 01:38, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
I dislike editing conflicts of any kind, so I'm not likely to oppose you strongly; but I suggest you either abandon this article or invest a lot more into it. Your source is in a foreign language and -- judging strictly by length -- says little. There is no evidence that the subject of the article is in any way a notable person. Simply having a relationship with a notable person (granting, for the sake of the argument, that the third son of the titular ruler of Luxembourg is notable) does not confer notability upon oneself. John Reid 06:18, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
