From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Temple University is part of the WikiProject Philadelphia, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Philadelphia on Wikipedia. This includes but is not limited to organizations as well as those not so affiliated, country and region-specific topics, and anything else related to Philadelphia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
 GA |
This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale. |
| Top |
This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale. |
- At Tokyo it says the Temple University is a university in Tokyo, Japan. /130.237.115.228 13:30, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
- There is a campus in Tokyo. There's also one in Rome. Metasquares 03:07, 26 August 2006 (UTC))
- this has no place in a wikipedia entry. furthermore the page is completely devoid of any sources. i have tagged it POV but i think the page requires alot of cleanup including removal of original research--modesty 21:18, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
-
- Well the pov tag is out of place. Stating that an article is "little more than an advertisement" w/o point out what you mean by that is not enough to tag the article. Also the statement about the t is not enough as the is not a enough of a pov statement to say the the whole article is POV, nor is the idea that it devoid of references, which while a problem is not enough to say is POV. I'll put a check and copy edit tag up, as well as a reference section, but before you tag pov please read WP:POV, and WP:NPOV. --Boothy443 | trácht ar 05:43, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
- Also the edit that you added to the article could be said of the same as the article you complained about, it is unsourced, could be considered original research, and is just as pov as what the rest of the article stands. Granted i think this is room for improvement in the language of the article but i would be leary to say that it is POV. --Boothy443 | trácht ar 05:47, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- thanks for leaving it up long enough to let me take it down. i see your points and i removed the pov check --155.247.166.28 17:10, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
- I am guessing that you are the person that posted the statment above mine, one of the problems with IP editing is tracking edits by users. I thank you, i apprecheate that you took the time to read over my points and took them under consideration. Whiel you did remove the tag i am going to put it back up for at least the next xeveral days to see if their are editors that might think otherwise. If their are no further objections i'll take it back down over the weekend. As for tags their are others that are of use to have points like yours expressed that are better then useing th pov tag, at least in my opinion, you can take a gander at the tags at WP:CR. --Boothy443 | trácht ar 04:13, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Criticisms
- The Criticisms section has a broken link as reference and seems to be a small-scale bickering type-of-thing? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tmcw (talk • contribs) .
- Humm, dont know what to tell you, though i do agree. --Boothy443 | trácht ar 05:44, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
