User talk:Stellertony

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents 1 g'nite, all! 1.1 Comments regarding RFC 3066 have been moved to Talk:RFC_3066 2 ArbComm Elections 3 Call for AMA election 4 Proposals for AMA Membership Meeting 5 Logs of first AMA Membership meeting 6 OFFICIAL SECOND MEETING NOTICE AND REQUEST FOR INFORMATION 7 OFFICIAL AMA THIRD MEETING NOTICE 7.1 Suggested Topics and Specific Proposals 8 Cajamarca, Peru - Ransom Room 9 AMA Meeting Proposal 10 stop with the merging already 11 Start with the merging already 12 Cup of tea test 13 X zoology 14 Grasshopper Page 15 Human Rights Servey on Wikipedia (The final post of I_sterbinski) 16 Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Template/Workshop 17 AMA 18 AMA Coordinator Election 19 Sea Star 20 Your AMA statement was deleted 21 Regarding Association of Members' Advocates

[edit] g'nite, all!

Stellertony the Bookcrosser 11:21, Nov 25, 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Comments regarding RFC 3066 have been moved to Talk:RFC_3066

Stellertony the Bookcrosser 22:21, Nov 26, 2004 (UTC)

[edit] ArbComm Elections

Grrr... "Sorry, your first contribution was only 88 days ago. You need to have been contributing for at least 90 days to vote in this election." Stellertony the Bookcrosser 06:22, Dec 15, 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Call for AMA election

AMA Member Advocate,

There's a poll currently in the AMA Homepage about making a new AMA Coordinator election. Please, cast your vote there (though it's not mandatory). Any comments you have about this, write it on the AMA Homepage talk page. Cheers, --Neigel von Teighen 18:43, 4 Jan 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Proposals for AMA Membership Meeting

As AMA Coordinator I am requesting that suggestions be placed on Wikipedia:AMA Membership Meeting plans for our first membership meeting, to be held in the near future, (hopefully before any election occurs.) Since we have never had any kind of "official" meeting we need to discuss how this will occur (i.e. Wiki pages or IRC channel), how it will be structured (i.e. meeting agenda) and if there will be any "chair" to supervise the meeting and meeting "secretary" to write up minutes or keep some kind of official record of what transpires. Thanks in advance for your input and your continued work as an advocate. — © Alex756 20:38, 5 Jan 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Logs of first AMA Membership meeting

You may view the log of the first meeting on the following two pages: Wikipedia:AMA IRC Meeting log (1-23-05) (first hour) and Wikipedia:AMA IRC Meeting log (1-23-05) Pt II (remainder of meeting). If you are interested in commenting on the agenda of the meeting please do so here:Wikipedia:AMA Meeting (suggested topics).

[edit] OFFICIAL SECOND MEETING NOTICE AND REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

"The second AMA Membership meeting will be held on Sunday January 30 2005 at 19:00 UTC on freenode IRC channel #AMA. That is 2 PM Eastern NA Time, 11 AM Pacific NA Time, and 8 PM Central European (Amsterdam/Stokholm/Warsaw/Venice) Time. All members are invited to attend."

The coordinator is requesting that members submit the following information for the upcoming coordinator’s report:

• How many individuals did you help as an advocate
• What is the maximum amount of time you put into a case
• Do you feel your work as an advocate was successful?
• How can the advocacy program of the AMA be improved?

Thank you. Please submit your responses here: Wikipedia:AMA Coordinator/January 2005 Survey

— © Alex756 23:28, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC) (The Coordinator)

[edit] OFFICIAL AMA THIRD MEETING NOTICE

The second AMA IRC Membership meeting was held on Sunday January 30, 2005 at 19:00 UTC on freenode.net IRC channel #AMA. Attending were Wally, Metasquares, Anthere, Sam Spade, and alex756 (coordinator). The log of the second meeting can be found here: Wikipedia:AMA IRC Meeting log (1-30-05).

"The third AMA Membership meeting will be held on Saturday February 12, 2005 at 17:00 UTC on freenode IRC channel #AMA. That is 12:00 Noon Eastern NA Time, 9 AM Pacific NA Time, and 6 PM Central European (Amsterdam/Stokholm/Warsaw/Venice) Time. All members are invited to attend.

[edit] Suggested Topics and Specific Proposals

MEMBERS PLEASE REVIEW

Suggestions for topics/proposals and agenda to be discussed at the next meeting are to be found at: Wikipedia:AMA Meeting (suggested topics). All members are requested to make proposals there and respond to proposals on the talk page there before the beginning of the next meeting so discussion can be held forthwith concerning such proposals. Thank you, your Coordinator.

The coordinator is requesting that members who have not done so already submit the following information for the upcoming coordinator’s report:

• How many individuals did you help as an advocate
• What is the maximum amount of time you put into a case
• Do you feel your work as an advocate was successful?
• How can the advocacy program of the AMA be improved?

Thank you. Please submit your responses here if you have not done so already. — © Alex756 23:32, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Cajamarca, Peru - Ransom Room

Hello! I've reading your contributions to several wars and thought maybe I can have some peer review from you on the article concerning Inca Atahualpa of Peru and his capture in Cajamarca's Ransom Room (where the Spaniards fought the natives there and executed Atahualpa during the conquest of Peru). Whenever you have time maybe you go over the Ransom Room article and help expand it a little if you think it needs corrections of some sort. I thank you in advance! Best wishes, --Dynamax 19:37, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Hi again. I'm sorry... I thought you were Albrecht, since on such user's discussion page he has a link to your user talk page. Something like "And if you have any more questions after that, feel free to post them on My User talk Page." ... and such link took me to your user talk page. --Dynamax 07:08, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] AMA Meeting Proposal

Hi! I put together a proposal for another AMA meeting that I'm hopeful you can chime in on. --Wgfinley 20:15, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] stop with the merging already

Please stop putting merge notices on earthworm. If you have material to add, please do so, but having already shown that you are not aware that "Lumbricus terrestris" and "earthworm" are not synonymous terms, please approach the subject with some humility. Well researched information, on the other hand, is always welcome. -- WormRunner | Talk 06:31, 16 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Start with the merging already

Hi there! You nominated a school for VfD... however, these tend to generate lengthy and unproductive debates. Please see Wikipedia:Schools for argumentation. If in the future you decide a school article is inappropriate, please consider merging it rather than nominating it for deletion. Yours, Radiant_* 10:07, May 26, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Cup of tea test

In which of the hg2g books was this test mentioned? I wanted to add that, but I don't recall reading about it. Joyous 15:40, May 28, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] X zoology

Hi. I've seen your work on the zoology of some species (especially that of frogs). It's a really good idea, because we're lacking in that content (esp. physiology). Plus it's great for people looking casual information. But I really think your articles should integrate better with the top article itself. Zoology is an extremely general term, so much that the top article X itself is the zoology of X. After a while of "wikipedia-evolution" the top article and your articles will start duplicating content. Not to say I 'm not pleased, your template could become a standard for all general animal groups. Also, realize that in current biology a group such as frogs only has vernacular use. Because of this, your article tends to generalize too much, and so not everything in it applies to all frogs. I don't know enough of frogs to weed out the article, however. Phlebas 13:01, Jun 11, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Grasshopper Page

Why was the photo gallery on the grasshopper page removed? I can see no reason why the photos on the old page (Grasshopper) shouldn't be included in the new version. That photo from fotoclipart.com Image:Greengrasshopper.jpg is useless compared to the old ones. --Fir0002 10:45, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Human Rights Servey on Wikipedia (The final post of I_sterbinski)

Dear all,

Wikipedia was recently a subject of intensive research of an huge international human right organization. A team of people from different nationalities and ages were acting on Wikipedia for 20 days, investigating previously noted anomalities of Wikipedia free editing and forming a final report, which (between the others similar reports) will later be a guide to all future moves of the organization concerning Wikipedia. Acting under an account of a real person, their privacy is to be held private. Therefore, very few private information will be revealed.

Also, this is a result of the lack of final possition of the organization concerning Wikipedia and human rights, which was still not formed.

The team's final post on Wikipedia, where they explain their actions can be found on the following addresses:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:I_sterbinski

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Macedonia#Human_Rights_Servey_on_Wikipedia_.28The_final_post_of_I_sterbinski.29

The team would like to thank to all the persons who took part in the correspondence with us.

We also want to appologise for keeping our identity secret for a longer period.

Best regards,

Aleksandar, Biljana, Asparuh, Christos, Valjon, Michael and Ana Luiza

I sterbinski 01:46, 28 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Template/Workshop

You, or any Wikipedia user, can contribute your suggestions and comments to the /Workshop page of any active arbitration case. Comments on evidence or proposals can help in understanding the import of evidence and in refining proposals. Proposed principles, findings of fact, or remedies may be listed on /Proposed decision and form part of the final decision. Fred Bauder 19:34, 26 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] AMA

Hello, you are receiving this message because your name is on the list of members of the Association of Members' Advocates. There is a poll being held at Wikipedia talk:Association of Members' Advocates for approval of a proposal for the revitalisation of the association. You are eligible to vote and your vote and input are welcome. Izehar 22:31, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] AMA Coordinator Election

Dear AMA Member,

You are entitled to vote in the AMA Coordinator election, set to begin at midnight on 3 February 2006. Please see the pages on the election and its candidates and the procedure and policy and cast a vote by e-mail!

Wally 11:34, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sea Star

Why don't you just put all the Sea Star information on the page instead of on your user page? It would be so much more helpful. Vesiv

[edit] Your AMA statement was deleted

Your AMA statement was deleted apparently carelessly from the AMA statements page (see this edit)if your statement needs to be restored, the text is at User:Pedant/AMA error Pedant 02:03, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding Association of Members' Advocates

Hi, you are receiving this message because you have listed yourself as an active member of WP:AMA. If you aren't currently accepting inquiries for AMA, or if you have resigned, please de-list yourself from Wikipedia:AMA Members. If you are still active, please consider tending to any new requests that may appear on Category:AMA Requests for Assistance. We're going to put AMA on wheels. :) Sorry for the template spamming - we're just trying to update our records, after we had a huge backlog earlier in the week (if you've been taking cases, then sorry, and please ignore this :)). Again, sorry, and thanks! Martinp23 21:31, 22 October 2006 (UTC)