Talk:Salutary neglect
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Robert Walpole can't have said much interesting about American colonial policy in 1688; he was only twelve! What year was this?
Contents |
[edit] Merge Salutory Neglect into Salutary Neglect
There is currently an article at the mis-spelled Salutory Neglect that should be merged into this article, whether or not a merger with Benign Negelct goes ahead. Since I know nothing about the topic I hope someone else will pick this up. Pontificake 08:29, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
hi my names emily!! :-P'
[edit]
[edit] Do NOT Merge
I have to agree with the guy two below me. It doesn't seem logical to merge them.
-Disagree, don't merge.
Yeah, don't merge
[edit] merge salutary neglect and benign neglect
Under benign neglect, salutary neglect is given as a synonym. The benign neglect page talks about a different example of the same thing. The articles should definitely be merged.
- Agreed, go for it!
[edit] DONT merge salutary neglect and benign neglect
but salutary neglect is distinctly refered to today in textbooks as the British policy of avoiding strict enforcement of parliamentary laws meant to keep the American colonies subservient to Great Britain. It is not the same as benign neglect because it is more specific...
- So I DISAGREE, DO NOT Merge the two topics
sn-mcdowellgirl91
[edit] Merge
Merge this with Salutary Neglect, as they are the same thing.
[edit] delete salutory neglect
Whenever you click on the link for salutory neglect, it takes you to salutary neglect. Therefore they are the same article, and since the official spelling is salutary neglect, salutory neglect should be deleted. agreed
