Salience (semiotics)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Semiotics/Semeiotics |
---|
General concepts |
Biosemiotics · Code |
Computational semiotics |
Connotation · Decode |
Denotation · Encode |
Lexical · Modality |
Salience · Sign |
Sign relation · Sign relational complex |
Semiosis · Semiosphere |
Semiotic literary criticism |
Triadic relation |
Umwelt · Value |
Methods |
Commutation test Paradigmatic analysis Syntagmatic analysis |
Semioticians |
Roland Barthes · Marcel Danesi |
Ferdinand de Saussure |
Umberto Eco · Louis Hjelmslev |
Roman Jakobson · Roberta Kevelson |
Charles Peirce · Thomas Sebeok |
Topics of interest |
Aestheticization as propaganda Aestheticization of violence Americanism |
Semiotics of Ideal Beauty |
In semiotics, salience refers to the relative importance or prominence of a piece of a sign. The relative salience of a sign helps an individual to quickly rank large amounts of information by importance, and give attention to that which is the most important. This stops an individual from becoming mentally overloaded with data.
[edit] Discussion
Human senses make a vast quantity of data available to the mind so the first question is to consider how the individual's internal mental organisation is configured to react. How does the mind interpret the data stream to filter out the irrelevant and leave only the salient signs? In semiotics, the process of converting signs into meaning is called semiosis. This is a metacognitive process working through schema that constitute a model of the world. Such schema are created through, and monitored using, a range of skills including pattern matching, analysis, and synthesis.
Meaning can be described as the “…system of mental representations of an object or phenomenon, its properties and associations with other objects and/or phenomena. In the consciousness of an individual, meaning is reflected in the form of sensory information, images and concepts.” (Bedny & Karwowsky, 2004). It is either denotative or connotative but the sign system for transmitting meanings can be uncertain in its operation or conditions may disrupt the communication and prevent accurate meanings from being decoded.
Further, meaning is socially constructed and dynamic as the culture evolves. This is problematic because an individual’s frame of reference and experience may produce some divergence from some of the prevailing social norms. So the salience of data will be determined by both situational and emotional elements in a combination relatively unique to each individual. For example, a person with an interest in botany may allocate greater salience to visual data involving plants, whereas a person training as an architect may scan buildings to identify features of interest. A person's world view or Weltanschauung may predispose salience to data matching those views. Because people live for many years, responses become conventional. At a group or community level, the conventional levels of significance or salience are slowly embedded in the sign systems and culture, and they cannot arbitrarily be changed.
[edit] References
Bedny, G. & Karwowski, W. (2004) Meaning and sense in activity theory and their role in the study of human performance. International Journal of Ergonomics and Human Factors. (26:2, 121-140.)