User talk:Ryanjunk
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Re:Earthdawn
Being a fan of the game, I am happy to see somebody working on it :) Btw, why do you blank your talk page?--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 21:11, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
- I blanked out the welcome message from my talk page, just seemed silly to keep it around. No messages since then apart from yours. Oh, one brief suggestion about tagging my vandalism reverts properly also. I read since then it's not considered good to do that, but I think it's no great harm for what was on it. Ryanjunk 21:15, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] DRV
Please stop disrupting DRV. I've closed and archived a debate and there is no need to resurrect a debate that has already gone on for too long. This is your only warning. --MarkSweep (call me collect) 19:45, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
- It is not your unilateral decision as to when debate has "gone on for too long". What is this my "only warning" toward? Ryanjunk 19:55, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
The discussion is now on the talk page where it belongs. The "Global notices" section is, not surprisingly, for notices, not for discussion. --MarkSweep (call me collect) 19:59, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] popups?
I see you reverting changes at Middle East, and using a comment about popups. While you are certainly reverting vandalism, I don't see how it relates to popups... am I missing something? -Harmil 19:21, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
- I guess my question was: how did your edit comment about this JavaScript tool relate to your edit (which was a reversion of vandalism)? -Harmil 19:30, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Stubs
Thanks for the reminder. However, using specific stubs usually is my practice, but the article literally no indication of what it weas at all. It could be a road, team or building for all the article stated (which it said founded, so figured it wasnt living). I considered nominating it for deletion, but tried to give it a chance.--Esprit15d 16:54, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Barf bag
You nominated this article for speedy deletion with the reason "Dictdef". However, "Dictdef" is not currently a criterion for speedy deletion on Wikipedia, so I have removed the tag.
You may use any of the following tags if you prefer:
- {{move to Wiktionary}} if you feel that expansion to an encyclopedia article is impossible
- {{afd}} if you feel that the article should be deleted
Thanks for helping clear up Wikipedia! Stifle 17:35, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Stubs
- Hello, Thank you for your stub submission. You may wish to note that it is preferable to use a stub template from Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Stub types instead of using simply {{stub}}, if you can. Thanks! Ryanjunk 16:56, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
-
- I quickly review many articles and stub them if needed - preferring to leave a polish of the stub type to someone with more time/interest in this type of house work. Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 12:08, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] FORscene
I believe that some time ago you nominated my article on FORscene for deletion for various reasons, one of which was a claim of non-notability. Following discussions with a number of people on WP, the consensus is that, although the article didn't make it clear, FORscene is notable. Now I have been on Wikipedia a bit longer, I have also come across the relevant WP guidelines: WP:CORP is the existing guideline and WP:SOFTWARE is the proposed guideline. As FORscene verifiably meets both these guidelines, would you consider amending your position on notability of FORscene? Alternatively, please could you explain the basis of your assertion. Stephen B Streater 20:20, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
