User talk:Reddi
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| I am intermittently inactive. | ||
| NOTE: Status is currently offline for the foreseeable future. Comments may not be answered in short order. This does not imply the violation of any of the Wikipedia policies. I sign on infrequently.
I currently access wikipedia through the Johnson County Library system and as such I will not be on much. Wikipedia also has grown more closed and biased since my first edits and that saddens me. So Long, and Thanks For All the Fish. JDR 18:52, 31 August 2005 (UTC) |
||
Put new comments below
Past discussion can be seen through the History page
|
Please review these articles before commenting:
From time to time I'll respond here and delete the old content; I'll leave them for a few weeks (mostly). JDR 18:52, 31 August 2005 (UTC) |
[edit] Responses
So Long, and Thanks for the all comments ... [replies here; sniping addressed ones; user responding to - comments; most "quoted" comments are in italics]
[edit] Joshuaschroeder, WMC, etc...
Tell these people to f*ck off!
- William M. Connolley (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log) (of whom has personally attacked me and pushes his POV; It's a Bad thing that he became a lawful evil admin; He among others also blocking people that appear to be me and are not! F*ckheads ...)
- ScienceApologist (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log) aka. Joshuaschroeder (Internet Troll; he has personally attacked me and pushes his POV)
- Hillman (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log) aka. Chris Hillman (pushes his POV and work in cahoots with William M. Connolley; F*ckhead has a Hillman/Dig/Reddi/publicwatchlist! Loser ... too bad that I haven't signed on for a few months ...)
[edit] Wikinquisition
Ryan Delaney delivered the following wikinquiition notice ...
The Wikinquisition has imposed the following penalties:
- Reddi shall for one year be limited to one revert per article per week, excepting obvious vandalism.
- Reddi is placed on Wikipedia:Probation for one year.
- Any three administrators, for good cause, may extend either Reddi's ban or probation in one year increments.
J. D. Redding 17:57, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Blocked
Blocked for breaching arbcom ruling Stifle (talk) 19:17, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
What the F*CK?!?! I haven't been around and I get Blocked?!?! Wikipedia has went to sh*t. J. D. Redding 17:57, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] New criticism, comments, and feedback
[edit] Talk:Boston Tea Party
Howdy, I noticed that you and I seem to post in one or two articles dealing with progressive issues in political science/sociology. There's currently a debate beginning in Boston Tea Party as to whether the article should include the category [1]. It meets definitions set in the articles Terrorism and Definition of terrorism, however, there are several self-proclaimed patriots who watch BTP who refuse to recognise the fact. The simple criteria for terrorism generally seem to be intimidation or destruction of property in order to change public policy or public opinion while a state of war has not yet been declared. Some users would rather use recent acts of terrorism as a yardstick, rather than using a firm definition, and hence lose their ability to discuss matters calmly. Would you be able to pop in to the Talk page and join in the discussion? Thanks much, samwaltz 05:06, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] NOR
There is akl angthy debate here, perhaps you have a comment [2]Slrubenstein | Talk 16:05, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
