Talk:Quentin Smith
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Unbelievable!! This article was obviously written by Quentin Smith himself and is replete with extraordinary bias (he is obviously a very intelligent but profoundly self-absorbed megalomaniac as anyone can see from his web site!!) but no one has caught on in to this in all this time. Come one now, folks!!--62.11.130.2 14:59, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
- A more charitable interpretation would suggest that the entry was written by a student of Smith's. Although it is true that the entry is biased (as I noted in my first edit; see history), it does contain some valuable material. It should therefore be improved upon, rather than removed entirely. Sir Paul 05:10, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
I am a former graduate student of Smith's, and I have written part of this (notice I said 'part'). Atomist 22:32, 27 May 2006 (UTC)Atomist
7/15/06 The edits of July 8 & 15 were me trying to fix the coding that make the sentence starting “Smith refused to surround himself…” run on one continuous line. I fixed the other coding issues like this but can’t figure out this one. Also added book listing & description. Reader of Smith’s work, not a student-
[edit] Obviously biased, needs significant revisions
Smith is probably worthy of an entry, but this is a gushy, uncritical article that rambles on and on. Probably written by one of Smith's former graduate students who uncritically worships him. Needs significant revisions.
[edit] Article reads like an essay
Smith is a signifcant philosopher of religion and has publcihed many books on time and so on. But this article needs to be tranformed from a laudatory essay into something more encylopedic. There are lOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONG quotes from Smith. These can be cut down a bit. It's hard to figure out how to reorgainze the current material into sections with headings and so on, though. --Francesco Franco aka Lacatosias 13:22, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
