Talk:PDCAAS
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I corrected the PDCAAS for wheat which was stated as 0.25, less than half the typical value. The 0.25 score is accurate for seitan, which consists only of the non-water soluble protein in wheat. Aragorn2 22:08, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Dead link
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
maru (talk) contribs 04:27, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] The advantages section is False.
This sentence is in the advantage section.>>> The PDCAAS is superior to both the PER and the BV.
The section should actually be changed to Disadvantages or a more neutral heading.
Also, POV sentence should be changed to >>> The PDCAAS and PER are not as accurate as the BV method.
There is a lot of POV going on here. Messenger2010 17:00, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
I changed the above edits for better sentences as Greenman suggested. Thanks Greenman. Messenger2010 18:28, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
- I can see why you added the POV tag, but your suggestions don't make much sense, and are just as POV - how about listing some resources discussing the various benefits of the different methods? Greenman 09:56, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
I agree with Greenman. There needs to be a major clean up here as Greenman can see why I added the POV tag. Messenger2010 18:28, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
I have updated the Methodology Section (formely it was called advantages which is a POV heading) for a NPOV. Messenger2010 05:03, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
