Talk:P.N.03
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
P.N.03 has been listed as a good article under the good-article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. |
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Computer and video games, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
 GA |
This article has been rated as GA-Class on the assessment scale. | |
 |
This is a selected article of WikiProject Computer and video games. | |
|
CVG To-do:
|
||
 |
The following users are active in maintaining and improving this article. If you have questions regarding verification and sources, they may be able to help: SeizureDog (talk • contribs) |
A gamecube game, P.N.03, or Product Number 03, sets the player as Venessa Schnieder, in the distant future. After C.A.M.S goes down (the main computer network on Mars), Venessa is sent in to clean up the mess. You only have one weapon, your suit, which is equipped wit ha hand shot, and a list of combo moves. Your main goal in each level is to get to a certain area, and/or destroy a certain objective. However, destroying enemies faster, without being hit, yields a higher combat point bonus, which is used to buy things like continues, or different suits. As you progress through the game, levels get longer, enemies get stronger, and your skills get better. The game has a pretty good future/techno soundtrack, and with all the bonus missions, it might take a while to complete.
[edit] Ga Failure
- Poor lead, should be 2 - 3 paragraphs
- WP:LEAD States only 1-2 paragraphs are needed for short articles.
- >< Forgot.
- "Gameplay" and "Critical reponse" are a little low on the ground
- P.N.03 is a pretty simple game, everything that needs to be covered is covered. Critical reaction is small because it was considered a pretty average game. If it was notable for being critical acclaimed or majorly panned, then it might need to be expanded, but as it is it doesn't benefit much from additional comments. Plus, WP:WIAGA only states such topics need to be covered, specifically stating that they do not have to be comprehensive.
- No reference to strategy guide
- A strategy guide was not used in reference. Neither was the manual (as it is pathetic). Very few video game articles have been citing strategy guides as sources, the Pokemon articles are the exception.
- Low external links
- Not a criteria for GA or FA at all. Plus, there aren't really any suitable links to put.
Keep trying, send me a message if you need me to explain anything, Highway Batman! 10:24, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
- Most of your comments aren't really applicable for failing the article. However, I will add rationales and try to add a bit more content, but I an unable to atm so I'll try to get around to it later.--SeizureDog 20:46, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
