O-ring

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Typical O-ring and application

An O-ring is a loop of elastomer with a round (o-shaped) cross-section used as a mechanical seal or gasket. They are designed to be seated in a groove and compressed during assembly between two or more parts, creating a seal at the interface.

The joint may be static, or (in some designs) have relative motion between the parts and the o-ring; rotating pump shafts and hydraulic cylinders, for example. Joints with motion usually require lubrication of the o-ring to reduce wear. This is typically accomplished with the fluid being sealed.

O-rings are one of the most common seals used in machine design because they are inexpensive and easy to make, reliable, and have simple mounting requirements. They can seal tens of megapascals (thousands of psi) pressure.

1 History
2 Theory and design
3 Material
4 Other seals
5 Challenger disaster
6 Future of the O-Ring
7 References
8 External links

[edit] History

The o-ring U. S. patent claim was filed in 1937 by a then 72 year old Danish-born man, Niels Christensen [1]. He was a machinist, and he came to America in 1891. He patented an air brake system for streetcars. Despite his legal efforts, his intellectual property rights were passed from company to company until they ended up at Westinghouse ^{[citation needed]}. During World War II, the US government commandeered the o-ring patent as a critical war-related item and gave the right to manufacture to other organizations. Christensen got a lump sum payment of US$75,000 for his efforts. Litigation resulted in a $100,000 payment to his heirs in 1971, 19 years after his death.

[edit] Theory and design

Successful o-ring joint design requires a rigid mechanical mounting that applies a predictable deformation to the o-ring. This introduces a calculated mechanical stress at the o-ring contacting surfaces. As long as the pressure of the fluid being contained does not exceed the contact stress of the o-ring, leaking cannot occur.

The seal is designed to have a point contact between the o-ring and sealing faces. This allows a high local stress, able to contain high pressure, without exceeding the yield stress of the o-ring body. The flexible nature of o-ring materials accommodates imperfections in the mounting parts.

O-rings are one of the most common yet important elements of machine design and are available in a large number of standard sizes denoted by AS568 designation [2], as well as Metric, Special, and International sizes [3], and a plethora of materials. [4] & [5] It is one of the simplest, yet most engineered, precise, and useful designs ever developed.

[edit] Material

Some small o-rings

O-ring selection is based on chemical compatibility [6], application temperature [7], sealing pressure, lubrication requirements, quality, quantity and cost.

Synthetic Rubbers - Thermosets:

Acrylonitrile butadiene copolymers (NBR)
Butadiene rubber (BR)
Butyl rubber (IIR)
Chlorosulfonated polyethylene (CSM)
Epichiorohydrin (ECH, ECO)
Ethylene propylene diene monomer (EPDM)
Ethylene propylene monomer (EPM)
Fluoroelastomers (FKM)
Perfluoroelastomer (FFKM)*
Polyacrylate (ACM)
Polychloroprene (CR)
Polyisoprene (IR)
Polysulfide rubber (PSR)
Semi-Conductive Fluorocarbon with nano carbon tubes.
Silicone rubber (SiR)
Styrene butadiene rubber (SBR)

* Perfluoroelastomer materials are by far the highest cost materials in the family of elastomers costing several thousand US dollars per kilo in the raw material form. However, they are impervious to most media and also exhibit the greatest resistance to high temperatures.

Thermoplastics:

Thermoplastic Elastomer (TPE) styrenics
Thermoplastic polyolefin (TPO) LDPE, HDPE, LLDPE, ULDPE
Thermoplastic Polyurethane (TPU) polyether, polyester
Thermoplastic etheresterelastomers (TEEEs) copolyesters
Thermoplastic polyamide (PEBA) Polyamides
Melt Processible Rubber (MPR)
Thermoplastic Vulcanizate (TPV)

[edit] Other seals

There are variations in profile design other than circular. These include are o-rings with x shaped profiles, commonly called x-rings or quad rings. When squeezed upon installation, they seal with 4 contact surfaces – 2 small contact surfaces on the top and bottom. This contrasts with the o-ring's comparatively larger single contact surfaces top and bottom. X-rings are currently being marketed as being more durable than o-rings.

There are also o-rings with a square profile, commonly called square-cut. When o-rings were selling at a premium because of the novelty, lack of efficient manufacturing processes and high labor content, square-cuts were introduced as an economical substitution for o-rings. The square-cut is manufactured by molding an elastomer sleeve which is then lathe cut. This style of seal was less expensive to manufacture with certain materials and molding technologies (compression, transfer, injection). The physical sealing property of square-cut is inferior to the o-rings. Today the price of o-rings has decreased to the point that the square cut design is nearly obsolete.

Similar devices with a non-round cross-section are called seals or packings. See also washer (mechanical).

[edit] Challenger disaster

Main article: Space Shuttle Challenger disaster

The failure of an O-ring seal was determined to be the cause of the Space Shuttle Challenger disaster on January 28, 1986. A contributing factor was cold weather prior to the launch. This was famously demonstrated on television by Caltech physics professor Richard Feynman, when he placed a small O-ring into ice-cold water, and subsequently showed its loss of pliability before an investigative committee.

O-rings are now examined under high-power video microscopes for defects

The material of the failed O-ring was Viton (Registered Trade name with DuPont) and the manufacturer of that particular O-ring was Morton-Thiokol in Utah, USA. Viton is not a good material for cold temperature applications. When an O-ring is frozen there is a T_g (glass transition temperature) from which it will not bounce back. Even when an O-ring does not reach T_g, the cold O-ring, once compressed, will take longer than normal to return to its original shape. The O-rings (and all other seals) work by creating positive pressure against a surface thereby preventing leaks. On the night before the launch, exceedingly low air temperatures were recorded. On account of this, NASA technicians performed an inspection. The ambient temperature was within launch parameters, and the launch sequence was allowed to proceed. However, the temperature of the rubber O-rings remained significantly lower than that of the surrounding air. During his investigation of the launch footage, Dr. Feynman observed a small out-gassing event from the Solid Rocket Booster (SRB) at the joint between two segments in the moments immediately preceding the explosion. This was blamed on a failed O-ring seal. The high temperature gas reacted explosively with the external tank, and the entire vehicle was destroyed as a result.

The rubber industry has gone through its share of transformation after the accident. All O-rings now come with batch and date coding, as in the medicine industry, to precisely track and control distribution. O-rings can, if need be, recalled off the shelf. [8] Furthermore, O-rings and other seals are routinely batch-tested for quality control by the manufacturers, and oftentimes undergo Q/A several more times by the distributor and ultimate end users.

As for the SRBs themselves, NASA and Morton-Thiokol redesigned them with a new joint design, which now incorporated three O-rings instead of two, with the joints themselves having onboard heaters which can be turned on when temperatures drop below 50 °F (10 °C). No O-ring issues have occurred since Challenger, and did not play a role in the Space Shuttle Columbia disaster of 2003.

[edit] Future of the O-Ring

An o-ring is one of the most simple, yet highly critical, precision mechanical components ever developed. However, there are new advances that may take some of the burden of critical sealing away from the exclusive domain of o-rings. There are cottage industries of elastomer consultants assisting in designing o-ring-less pressure vessels. Nano-rubber is one such new frontier. Presently these advancements are increasing the importance of o-rings. Since o-rings encompass the areas of chemistry and material science, any advancement in nano-rubber will affect the o-ring industry.

Already there are elastomers filled with nano-carbon and nano-PTFE and molded into o-rings used in high performance applications. For example carbon nanotubes are used in electrostatic dissipative applications and nano-PTFE is used in ultra pure semiconductor applications. The use of nano-PTFE in fluoroelastomers and perfluoroelastomers improves abrasion resistance, lowers friction, lowers permeation, and can act as clean filler.

Using conductive carbon black or other fillers can exhibit the useful properties of conductive rubber, namely preventing electrical arching, static sparks, and the overall build-up of charge within rubber that may cause it to behave like a capacitor (electrostatic dissipative). By dissipating these charges, these materials, which include doped carbon-black and rubber with metal filling additives, reduce the risk of ignition, which can be extremely useful for fuel lines.