Microwave auditory effect

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The neutrality of this article is disputed. Please see the discussion on the talk page.

The microwave auditory effect, also known as the microwave hearing effect or the Frey effect, consists of audible clicks induced by pulsed/modulated microwave frequencies that are generated directly inside the human head without the need of any receiving electronic device. The effect was first reported by persons working in the vicinity of radar transponders during World War II. These induced sounds are not audible to other nearby people. The microwave auditory effect was later discovered to be inducible with shorter-wavelength portions of the electromagnetic spectrum. During the Cold War era, the American neuroscientist Allan H. Frey studied this phenomenon and was the first to publish (1961) information on the nature of the microwave auditory effect; this effect is therefore also known as the Frey effect.

Research by NASA in the 1970s showed that this effect occurs as a result of thermal expansion of parts of the human ear around the cochlea, even at low power density. Later, signal modulation was found to produce sounds or words that appeared to originate intracranially. It was studied for its possible use in communications but has not been developed due to the possible hazardous biological effects of microwave radiation. Similar research conducted in the USSR studied its use in non-lethal weaponry.

Some conspiracy theorists have supposed that this effect is used for mind control. They claim patent U.S. Patent 3,951,134 (Malech; April 20, 1976) is for this purpose.

Contents 1 Natural sources of electromagnetic perception 2 Full spectrum electromagnetic perception 3 Primary Cold War-era research in the US 4 Peaceful applications 5 Weaponization 6 Patented applications 7 See also 8 References 9 External links

[edit] Natural sources of electromagnetic perception

For centuries, humans have reported hearing unexplained noises in conjunction with meteors. Astronomer Edmund Halley collected several such accounts after a widely-observed meteor burned up in the sky over England [1]. The Leonid meteor shower in November 2001 also led to many reports of observers hearing crackling or fizzing noises. Similar observations have been reported by soldiers near the site of nuclear explosions. Reports of "thunder-like sounds" at the scene of the Tunguska meteorite on June 30 1908 might also be explained by this phenomenon.

Colin Keay, a physicist at the University of Newcastle in Australia, has advanced a hypothesis that purports to explain these phenomena. Meteor trails give off very low frequency (VLF) radio signals. Since the human ear cannot sense these signals directly, Keay reasons that a transducer on the ground must be converting the radio waves into sound waves. He has produced experiments that demonstrate that materials as commonplace as aluminum foil, thin wires, pine needles, and wire-framed glasses can act as suitable transducers. Powerful VLF waves can induce physical vibrations in these objects, which are transmitted to the air as sound waves. Keay defines the field of geophysical electrophonics as "the production of audible noises of various kinds through direct conversion by transduction of very low frequency electromagnetic energy generated by a number of geophysical phenomena." [2] It is thought that electrophonic effects may also be caused by lightning strikes, very bright auroras, and earthquakes.

Electroreception has also been studied in the animal world. Ritz et al., in "A Model for Photoreceptor-Based Magnetoreception in Birds", hypothesize that transduction of the Earth's geomagnetic field is responsible for the magnetoreception systems of birds. Specifically, they propose that this transduction may take place in a class of photoreceptors known as cryptochromes.

References:

• "Listening to Leonids", NASA Science and Technology Directorate
• Colin Keay's web site

[edit] Full spectrum electromagnetic perception

In general, by scanning the full spectrum of the electromagnetic frequencies, it appears that the shorter the wavelength, the higher the limit of resolution of the EMF carrier, thus allowing ever increased physiological effect in the exposed subject.

• Starting with the well documented microwaves, where the effect is due to the induction of thermoelastic waves by radio frequency pulses at a boundary between the tissues of dissimilar dielectric properties within the head, with propagation of the waves to the auditory system.

• Then more interesting, the Infrared wavelengths are already short enough to allow the individual neuron discrimination, thus efficiently usable in the direct controlled neural firing process (Discover Magazine,November Edition 2004).

• X-rays were known to induce visual effect since their discovery in 1895 as reported by G. Brandes in the form of an uniform blue-gray glow that might be explained today as the result of direct excitation of retinal nerve cells. These wavelengths might already allow the direct discrimination of individual synapses.

• Gamma rays were first reported to cause visual perception of flashes of light during the Apollo program. Indeed, astronauts en route for the Moon were subject to cosmic rays bombardments, inducing some Cherenkov effect in the fluid of their eyeballs. It is not excluded that the same effect might occur when a gamma ray strikes a neuron or a synapse and inducing a photoelectric effect. In addition, gamma ray wavelengths might even allow the direct discrimination of individual neurotransmitters.

[edit] Primary Cold War-era research in the US

The first American to publish on the microwave hearing effect was Allan H. Frey, in 1961. In his experiments, the subjects were discovered to be able to hear appropriately pulsed microwave radiation, from a distance of 100 meters from the transmitter. This was accompanied by side effects such as dizziness, headaches, and a pins and needles sensation.

Sharp and Grove soon developed for the Advanced Research Projects Agency at Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, receiverless wireless voice transmission application, in 1975.

[edit] Peaceful applications

Devices used for scaring birds away from aircraft near airfields by microwave hearing and induction of vertigo exist (Kreithen ML. Patent #5774088 “Method and system for warning birds of hazards” USPTO granted 6/30/98).

But the majority of applications are dedicated for direct machine to brain wireless communication, with numerous patents.

[edit] Weaponization

It is alleged that research was conducted in the US to study its use in non-lethal weaponry.^{[verification needed]}

While the USSR is supposed to have concentrated their effort in the microwave band of the spectrum, frequencies that can be easily thwarted with conventional EMF shielding like Faraday Cage or Tempest, it is highly suspected that the US might have explored and mastered more exotic, ground penetrating, metal penetrating long range carriers, allowing by the same time the achievement of even higher limit of resolution.^{[citation needed]}

[edit] Patented applications

• Flanagan GP. Patent #3393279 “Nervous System Excitation Device” USPTO granted 7/16/68.
• Puharich HK and Lawrence JL. Patent #3629521 “Hearing systems” USPTO granted 12/21/71.
• Malech RG. Patent #3951134 “Apparatus and method for remotely monitoring and altering brain waves” USPTO granted 4/20/76.
• Stocklin PL. Patent #4858612 “Hearing device” USPTO granted 8/22/89.
• Brunkan WB. Patent #4877027 “Hearing system” USPTO granted 10/31/89.
• Thijs VMJ. Application #WO1992NL0000216 “Hearing Aid Based on Microwaves” World Intellectual Property Organization Filed 1992-11-26, Published 1993-06-10.
• Mardirossian A. Patent #6011991 “Communication system and method including brain wave analysis and/or use of brain activity” USPTO granted 1/4/00.

[edit] See also

• Biophoton
• Brain-computer interface
• Cosmic ray visual phenomena
• Electroreception
• Mind control
• Tinfoil hat

[edit] References

• R.C. Jones, S.S. Stevens, and M.H. Lurie. J. Acoustic. Soc. Am. 12: 281, 1940.
• H. Burr and A. Mauro. Yale J Biol. and Med. 21:455, 1949.
• H. von Gierke. Noise Control 2: 37, 1956.
• J. Zwislocki. J. Noise Control 4: 42, 1958.
• R. Morrow and J. Seipel. J. Wash. Acad. SCI. 50: 1, 1960.
• A.H. Frey. Aero Space Med. 32: 1140, 1961.
• P.C. Neider and W.D. Neff. Science 133: 1010,1961.
• R. Niest, L. Pinneo, R. Baus, J. Fleming, and R. McAfee. Annual Report. USA Rome Air Development Command, TR-61-65, 1961.
• A.H. Frey. "Human auditory system response to modulated electromagnetic energy." J Applied Physiol 17 (4): 689-92, 1962.
• A.H. Frey. "Behavioral Biophysics" Psychol Bull 63(5): 322-37, 1965.
• F.A. Giori and A.R. Winterberger. "Remote Physiological Monitoring Using a Microwave Interferometer", Biomed Sci Instr 3: 291-307, 1967.
• A.H. Frey and R. Messenger. "Human Perception of Illumination with Pulsed Ultrahigh-Frequency Electromagnetic Energy", Science 181: 356-8, 1973.
• R. Rodwell. "Army tests new riot weapon", New Scientist Sept. 20, p 684, 1973.
• A.W. Guy, C.K. Chou, J.C. Lin, and D. Christensen. "Microwave induced acoustic effects in mammalian auditory systems and physical materials", Annals of New York Academy of Sciences, 247:194-218, 1975.
• D.R. Justesen. "Microwaves and Behavior", Am Psychologist, 392(Mar): 391-401, 1975.
• S.M. Michaelson. "Sensation and Perception of Microwave Energy", In: S.M. Michaelson, M.W. Miller, R. Magin, and E.L. Carstensen (eds.), Fundamental and Applied Aspects of Nonionizing Radiation. Plenum Press, New York, p 213-24, 1975.
• E.S. Eichert and A.H. Frey. "Human Auditory System Response to Lower Power Density Pulse Modulated Electromagnetic Energy: A Search for Mechanisms", J Microwave Power 11(2): 141, 1976.
• W. Bise. "Low power radio-frequency and microwave effects on human electroencephalogram and behavior”, Physiol Chem Phys 10(5): 387-98, 1978.
• J.C. Lin. "Microwave Auditory Effects and Applications", Thomas, Springfield Ill, p 176, 1978.
• P.L. Stocklin and B.F. Stocklin. "Possible Microwave Mechanisms of the Mammalian Nervous System", T-I-T J Life Sci 9: 29-51, 1979.
• H. Frolich. "The Biological Effects of Microwaves and Related Questions", Adv Electronics Electron Physics 53: 85-152, 1980.
• H. Lai. “Neurological Effects of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Radiation” In: J.C. Lin (ed.), Advances in Electromagnetic Fields in Living Systems vol 1, Plenum, NY & London, p 27-80, 1994.
• R.C. Beason and P. Semm. "Responses of neurons to an amplitude modulated microwave stimulus", Neurosci Lett 333: 175-78, 2002.
• J.A. Elder and C.K. Chou. "Auditory Responses to Pulsed Radiofrequency Energy", Bioelectromagnetics Suppl 8: S162-73, 2003.

[edit] External links

• Seaman, Ronald L., "Transmission of microwave-induced intracranial sound to the inner ear is most likely through cranial aqueducts" Mckesson Bioservices Corporation, Wrair US Army Medical Research Detachment. (PDF)
• Lin, J.C., 1980, "The microwave auditory phenomenon", Proceedings of the IEEE, 68:67-73. Navy-NSF-supported research.
• Lin, JC., "Microwave auditory effect- a comparison of some possible transduction mechanisms". J Microwave Power. 1976 Mar;11(1):77-81. 1976.
• Guy, A.W., C.K. Chou, J.C. Lin and D. Christensen, 1975, Microwave induced acoustic effects in mammalian auditory systems and physical materials, Annals of New York Academy of Sciences, 247:194-218
• Fist, Stewart, "Australian exposure standards". Crossroads, The Australian, March 1999.
• Microwave auditory effects and applications, James C. Lin; Publisher: Thomas; ISBN 0-398-03704-3
• Malech, Robert G., "US3951134 : Apparatus and method for remotely monitoring and altering brain waves". April 20, 1976.
• McMurtrey, John J., "Inner Voice, Target Tracking, and Behavioral Influence Technologies". Nov. 14, 2004.
• US Department of Defense, Air Force Research Laboratory comprehensive review on RFR-auditory effect in humans
• Thijs VMJ. Application #WO1992NL0000216 “Hearing Aid Based on Microwaves” World Intellectual Property Organization Filed 1992-11-26, Published 1993-06-10.
• Kohn B. “Communicating Via the Microwave Auditory Effect” Defense Department Awarded SBIR Contract # F41624-95-C9007, 1993.
• “Auditory Responses to Pulsed Radiofrequency Energy” Bioelectromagnetics Suppl 8: S162-73, 2003.
• Suppes P, Lu Z, and Han B. “Brain wave recognition of words” Proc Natl Acad Sci 94: 14965-69, 1997.
• Suppes P, Han B, and Lu Z. “Brain-wave recognition of sentences” Proc Natl Acad Sci 95: 15861-66, 1998.
• Assadullahi R and Pulvermuller F. “Neural Network Classification of Word Evoked Neuromagnetic Brain Activity” In: Wermter S, Austin J, and Willahaw D (eds.) Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence: Emergent Neurocomputational Architectures Based on Neuroscience Heidelberg Springer, p 311-20, 2001.
• Smith C. “On the Need for New Criteria of Diagnosis of Psychosis in the Light of Mind Invasive Technology” J Psycho-Social Studies 2(2) #3, 2003.
• McMurtrey JJ. “Microwave Bioeffect Congruence with Schizophrenia” In press, 2003.