Talk:MediaMonkey
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Advertisement???
As the creator and (mostly) maintainer of this page, I disagree with the comment that this page reads like an advertisement. I am interested in which parts caused this thought. Please detail... As the "person" making this assertion did so behind an "anonymous" IP address (as opposed to a registered user), I am going to take this comment with a grain of salt, and will remove it after a couple of days. Anubis1975 06:26, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
Hi,
The reason I marked this as an NPOV violation was because of the tone used in the article. Some examples:
"... that contains powerful media library capability. One of MediaMonkey's strengths is in managing digital music that is held on a computer" Two points. Firstly, the term powerful is not a fact. If someone did not think the product was powerful themselves, they would be disagreeing with the article and this is against the NPOV policy on Wikipedia. The strengths part is a different beast - the strength of a digital media organiser can't be that it organises digital media, that's something that is expected of the product.
The other point I would like to draw your attention to is the last paragraph. While it's nice that you extole the virtues of the community-driven development scheme, it once again isn't a neutral point of view. The content can be kept, however something needs to be done not to upset the powers that be (if you know what I mean!).
Try this:
As of 2006, MediaMonkey is still being actively developed with new releases available two or three times a year. In addition, users are able to contribute to the develpment process by submitting requests to the devlopers, who frequent the official forums [1] (with that 1 being the link to the forum).
I don't mean to be a kill-joy - I think the article can be improved with some work.
Good job at editing the NPOV stuff. Can we remove the flag now? Anubis1975 05:28, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
