Talk:Masters of Cinema
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Films, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to films and film characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | ||||||
|
|||||||
|
Editing Guidelines
|
|||||||
 |
This article was nominated for deletion on July 31, 2006. The result of the discussion was keep. |
Someone pegged this page as being "an advertisement" and being about a "non-notable website". This page is perfectly legitimate, it is information about "Masters of Cinema" and the website is far from "non-notable", it is award-winning, non-profit based, and has been around for over five years. N. W. Peerpee 16:43, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
- If the website is so notable and has been around for so long, how come there are no listed citings by major news agencies, magazines, etc? Please add some quickly if you wish to prevent the deletion. You may also wish to comment on the AfD page, rather than on the article's talk page. LinaMishima 21:56, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] KEEP
i WOULD vote with my feet to keep this site. It is non-commercial in nature, maintained by the devotees of the Art known as Cinema and thus belongs to the general treasure of knowledge, rightfully here in wikipedia. I personally have seen entries in this encyclopedia with infinitely less content and shallow essence, so why the heck not a professional site (one of its kind) entirely devoted to the true masters of Cinema? There are many people across the world who sacrifice their time and energy , sometimes at the expense of their families and friends to keep that great resource going! IMO it would be a big loss to Wikipedia if you delete this article. Please consider keeping it. Thank u in advance.
- This isn't really the place for that comment. It belongs at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Masters of cinema. What's more, the hard work of the people at the MoC site isn't really a criterion for it's place as an encyclopedic entry. Jun-Dai 02:00, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
