User talk:MarshallBagramyan
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 Archives |
|---|
|
User_talk:MarshalBagramyan/Archive 1 (27 December 2005 - 29 July 2006) User_talk:MarshalBagramyan/Archive 2 (29 August 2006 - 5 November 2006) |
Contents |
[edit] Result of Armenia strawpoll
Thanks for your comments on the Armenia talkpage. I will choose not to take the phrase insane illogicacy personally, as per the policy of assuming good faith. The reason I have proposed this compromise is because, as User:Caligvla's official advocate (see AMA, Association of Members' Advocates), I am trying to find a reasonable compromise between the two points of view on this issue. I personally have no view about the issue of Armenia; I'm only trying to do my job as an advocate by generating a constructive consensus, as per Wikipedia policy. At the moment, it seems there are equally strong sources/references on both sides (see my talkpage and also Talk:Armenia). If you would like to suggest a compromise that seems more reasonable to you, please do so on my talk page. Walton monarchist89 12:15, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
you mean the quotes in the article? ok I will try. bye for today. thanks for decent talkneurobio 03:19, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] RfC opening on Armenia
Given the complete deadlock on this issue, and the failure of the strawpoll, I think the time has come to take the dispute-resolution process to the next level by opening a request for comment. This will open the debate up to the whole Wikipedia community, and hopefully generate, if not consensus, then at least a majority view. I will invite all users involved in this issue to contribute to the RfC, which can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/History and geography. I realise that you may now be a bit bored with having to explain your views again and again on different pages, but as an advocate I think this is the only way to finally end this dispute. Walton monarchist89 09:06, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Strawpoll
NB This poll has now closed, it being Friday 10th November and about 10.30am where I live. The numbers are as follows:
- Support 6 (although User:Hamparzoum's existence has been disputed by User:Tekleni.
- Neutral 1.
- Oppose 10.
As such, no mandate has appeared for making the requested changes to the article. As previously advertised, Caligvla and I are taking a break from this dispute for a week. After this, the case may be taken to the mediation cabal, although I hope to avoid this eventuality. Walton monarchist89 10:38, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Ottoman Muslim casualties
Hey Marshall, be sure to check this out when you get a chance. Best, Clevelander 22:45, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
