Marzpanate Period
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is part of the series on: |
|||
| Early History | |||
| Haik | |||
| Hayasa-Azzi | |||
| Kingdom of Urartu | |||
| Orontid Armenia | |||
| Kingdom of Armenia | |||
| Artaxiad Dynasty | |||
| Arsacid Dynasty | |||
| Medieval History | |||
| Marzpanate Period | |||
| Byzantine Armenia | |||
| Bagratuni Armenia | |||
| Kingdom of Vaspurakan | |||
| Armenian Kingdom of Cilicia | |||
| Foreign Rule | |||
| Persian Rule | |||
| Ottoman Rule | |||
| Russian Rule | |||
| Hamidian Massacres | |||
| Armenian Genocide | |||
| Early Independence | |||
| Democratic Republic of Armenia | |||
| Soviet Armenia | |||
| Armenian Soviet Socialist Republic | |||
| Modern Armenia | |||
| Republic of Armenia | |||
Marzpanate period is the time in Armenian history after the fall of the Arshakuni Dynasty of Armenia in 428, when most of Armenia was governed by Marzbans (Governors-general of the boundaries), nominated by the Sassanid Persian King. Meanwhile, Byzantine Armenia was at that time ruled by Kuroupalates (Governors). The Marzpanate period ended with the Arab conquest of Armenia in the 7th century.
The Marzpan was invested with supreme power, even to the imposing of death sentences; but he could not interfere with the age-long privileges of the Armenian nakharars. The country as a whole, enjoyed a considerable autonomy. The office of Hazarapet, corresponding to that of a Minister of the Interior and Public Works, was entrusted to an Armenian, as was also the post of Sparapet (Commander-in‑chief). Each nakharar had his own army, according to the extent of his domain. The "National cavalry" or "Royal force" was under the Commander-in‑chief. The tax collectors were all Armenians. The courts of justice and the schools were directed by the Armenian clergy.
Three times during the Marzpanic period, Persian kings launched persecutions against Christianity in Armenia. The Persians had tolerated the invention of the Armenian alphabet and the founding of schools, thinking those would promote the spiritual severance of Armenia from the Byzantines; but on the contrary, the new cultural movement among the Armenians actually proved to be conducive to a closer relation with Byzantium.
[edit] References
This article incorporates text from History of Armenia by Vahan M. Kurkjian, a publication in the public domain.
