Locke v. Davey

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Locke v. Davey

Supreme Court of the United States

Argued December 2, 2003
Decided February 25, 2004


Full case name:	Gary Locke, Governor of Washington, et al., Petitioners v. Joshua Davey

Citations:	540 U.S. 712; 124 S. Ct. 1307; 158 L. Ed. 2d 1; 2004 U.S. LEXIS 1626; 72 U.S.L.W. 4206; 17 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 163

Prior history:	On writ of cert. to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Davey v. Locke, 299 F.3d 748, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 14461 (9th Cir. Wash., 2002)

Holding

The Court upheld the constitutionality of a Washington publicly funded scholarship program which excluded students pursuing a "degree in theology."

Court membership

Chief Justice: William Rehnquist
Associate Justices: John Paul Stevens, Sandra Day O'Connor, Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy, David Souter, Clarence Thomas, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer

Case opinions

Majority by: Rehnquist
Joined by: Stevens, O'Connor, Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer
Dissent by: Scalia
Joined by: Thomas
Dissent by: Thomas

Laws applied

U.S. Const. amend. I

Locke v. Davey, 540 U.S. 712 (2004), is a United States Supreme Court decision upholding the constitutionality of a Washington publicly funded scholarship program which excluded students pursuing a "degree in theology." This case examined the "room.. between the two Religion Clauses", the Free Exercise Clause and the Establishment Clause.

Chief Justice William Rehnquist wrote the opinion with Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas dissenting.

1 Holding
2 Background
- 2.1 The scholarship
3 After the decision

[edit] Holding

The statute was upheld. The Court held that there was nothing "inherently constitutionally suspect" in the denial of funding for vocational religious instruction. Even if there were, Washington had a "substantial state interest" in not funding "devotional degrees."

[edit] Background

[edit] The scholarship

In 1999, the state of Washington legislature created a scholarship, the Promise Scholarship. The scholarships were for roughly $1,250 and were funded through the State's general fund. The scholarship was available for qualified students who enrolled for "at least half time in an eligible postsecondary institution in the state of Washington", but who is not pursuing a degree in theology.

The scholarship was available to any graduate of a Washington public or private high school. The student must be in the top 15%, receive a score of 1,200 or higher on the SAT, or score higher than a 27 on the American College Test. In addition, the student's family's income must be less than 135% of the median.

[edit] After the decision

Joshua Davey, the student who lost this case, enrolled in Harvard Law School in 2003, shortly before the case was argued before the Supreme Court.[1][2] He graduated in 2006, having served as a managing editor for the Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy in his final year.[3]