Talk:Jiva
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Vedanta, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Vedanta. Please participate by editing the article Jiva, or visit the project page for more details on the projects.
|
[edit] soul
sorry, I don't mean to be difficult, but christians by no means have exclusive domain to the word soul. Sam Spade 04:58, 26 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- I didn't say they did, although one could argue that the word has strong Abrahamic connotations. What bothers me about your wording is that it seems to imply that "soul" would be an acceptable translation for "jiva". None of the English-speaking Hindus or Jains I know would use the word "soul" other than to refer to the western concept of soul, which is distinct from the vedic concept of jiva. Mkweise 10:36, 26 Mar 2004 (UTC)
[edit] JIVA
What are they similarities and differences betweem the concept of jiva and of atman? Are they the same or just related?
[edit] Translating vs. Communication
Many Vedantic and even Sufi words have no perfect western counterpart. For instance the western word "God" with all its Abrahamic connnotations, falls very far from approximating Shankara's "Brahman." However, we are in a new era where east and west are trading notes so to speak, and some in the west are keen to try to grasp eastern philosophy. To make this easier it is useful to reference a western term that at least approximates the eastern usage of another term -- comes closest. I think the article is currently clear that "soul" and "jiva" or "atma" are by no way exact correlaries, but certainly approximately analogous. Meher Baba was one person who tried very hard to create a trio-lexicon that could be useful for encouraging cross-overs in communication of esoteric mystical philosophy and incite discussion across traditions. See a useful discussion of this subject at Talk:Godman (disambiguation)
