Talk:Hurricane Danielle (2004)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Todo
The insanity begins... ;) What's needed is inline sourcing, and a little more outside of Storm History. You could do a Forecasting section by using the tropical discussions. Hurricanehink (talk) 00:08, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
- Cape Verde storms tend to have long storm history sections; see Hurricane Irene (2005) for a similar one (of course this needs a lot of work, I did it from scratch tonight - same with Earl) CrazyC83 01:58, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
-
- Yea, not a bad job do far. The storm history is good, but it needs more than just that. Hurricanehink (talk) 02:00, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
- There's no need for a seperate forecasting section, that can be interlaced into the rather short history section (on lines of Irene). The intro should be expanded significantly and the non-retirement of the name should be included. And everything should be inline ref'd and {{cite web}}'ed. Pictures too; I'll go hunting for MODIS when I get the chance.--Nilfanion (talk) 07:44, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
- Yea, not a bad job do far. The storm history is good, but it needs more than just that. Hurricanehink (talk) 02:00, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
- But Irene had at least Impact and naming. Danielle didn't have anything outside of impact, so a forecasting section, while a little redundant, could provide something else. Hurricanehink (talk) 11:34, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
-
-