Wikipedia:History of Wikipedian processes and people
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The history of Wikipedia is more than the story of the development of its external face. There is also the story of the development of its processes and the people who contributed to that development. This is the part of the history that is likely to be of interest only to editors.
Contents |
[edit] Processes
[edit] Wikipedia:Featured articles
- Created out of Wikipedia:Brilliant prose in March 2004.
- Raul654 was ratified as the Featured Article Director in a poll ending 12 August 2004. Sixteen users voted to ratify Raul654 into the position he was already occupying, four voted for a community wide open election and four voted to have an election only if Raul654 didn't want the job.
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates was created by [] on [] as place to vote for or against proposed new featured articles. Updated every few days; articles now stay for 5 days or more (previously a week) and now used trancluded subpages
Wikipedia:Peer review was created by [] on [] as a central place to list articles for comments from the community. Now used trancluded subpages
Wikipedia:Featured article removal candidates was created as the antidote to FAC, created by [] on [] to identify and removed featured article candiadates that no longer meet the criteria for a featured article, either because the article has been edited or because the criteria have become stricter.
[edit] Stubs
How did the term evolve, who developped the stub notice, how came it to be split in topic stubs, when was the first substub discovered...
[edit] Collaborations
[edit] Wikipedia:Collaboration of the week
Collaboration of the week (COTW) was created as Article of the week (AOTW) on 29 April 2004 following a proposal by Tom- on 26 April 2004. The first COTW (then AOTW) was Situs inversus, which was selected on 6 May 2004 having received 12 votes over 8 days.
The idea was to provide a central location to identify, select and improve non-existent (red link) or very short (stub) articles, mobilising the resources of the whole Wikipedia community to cooperate on a single selected article and create as close as possible to a featured-standard article within one week. Following a vote, the name of the this process and the winning pages changed to "Collaboration of the week" after Diplomacy was selected as the last AOTW on 22 August 2004.
COTW has always used approval voting, that it only votes in favour of a nominee with votes against not being allowed. As of 21 April 2005, only one vote has been tied, when Renaissance was tied with Baghdad with 21 votes each. After an extension of 24 hours, Renaissance gained 5 more votes and was selected, although Baghdad was selected the following week. Following a close vote, the present procedure was adopted of extending voting by 24 hours, and then selecting the article by seniority (that is, the article that was nominated first).
Since June 2004, COTW nominees have been pruned (that is, removed and archived in Wikipedia:Collaboration of the week/Removed) if they fail to generate sufficient interest and votes. The pruning threshold is set at 5 votes per week, increased from the original 4 votes per week in late 2004 because there was concensus that nominees were taking too long to be selected as COTW, disspiating the goodwill of nominators and voters. Previously, nominees were pruned on an ad hoc basis.
Years before COTW was created, the very first organized collaboration to improve an article was started when a short "article-a-day" e-mail on the Milgram experiment sent on 30 August 2001, when only 145 people had user pages. Thus this article was the very first precursor to the Collaboration of the week (see Wikipedia:Announcements August 2001) .
Although COTW has proven to be an effective way to generate interest (with typically tens of votes for the selected articles, and tens or hundreds of edits to the selected articles) and expand articles (with most expanding by hundreds or thousands of percent), it has been rather less successful than hoped in producing featured articles: as of 21 April 2005, 49 articles have been COTW but only five been become featured (Academia, Siege, Space Race, League of Nations and Military history of the Soviet Union) .
Past proposals to improve COTW include having two COTWs, having subsidiary COTWs for special interest areas (many of which were created in fits of enthusiasm in late 2004, but few of which have retained enough interest to remain active), listing the COTW on the main page.
[edit] Countering Systemic Bias
Created by Xed on [ ] to identify and correct systemic bias in Wikipedia, manifested by the poor state of articles on important topics, such as countries and cultures in the Third World, and based largely on the theory that this neglect was a product of the demographics of the participants.
In August and September 2004, the foundations of CSB were laid at User:Xed/CROSSBOW (now located at Wikipedia:CROSSBOW), an acronym for Committee Regarding Overcoming Serious Systemic Bias Of Wikipedia. The page was the immediate result of a discussion on the Village Pump. Much initial work was done by User:Xed, User:Jmabel, User:Filiocht, and User:Solitude. A draft manifesto was produced by Jmabel at Sept 23, 2004. After a poll it was decided to remould the initiative into a Wikiproject and to name the project Countering Systemic Bias.
Although CSB has been focused mainly on highlighting areas and topics that lack sufficient coverage, early on there was much discussion of the possibility of this project being involved more in recruiting participants from currently underrepresented demographics.
[TBC]
[edit] Wikipedia:Article improvement drive
Article improvement drive (AID) was created in early 2005 as a counterpart to COTW. COTW limits itself to non-existent or stub articles, and many articles, while wholly deficient in themselves, were rejected as COTW nominees for not meeting the relatively strict criteria. Non-stub articles in need of collaborative improvement
[process - TBC]
[edit] Wikipedia:Translation into English
Although translation of materials across Wikipedias has happened from early on, some discussions led to the February 11 2004 creation of the current Wikipedia:Translation into English (WP:TIE) page, which was created and continues to be informally managed by User:Jmabel; the related Wikipedia:Translators available was spun out in September 2004 by HappyDog. The page allows a systematic way for Wikipedians to request, coordinate, and announce translations of articles (or portions of articles) from other Wikipedias to the English Wikipedia.
At about the same time as WP:TIE was created, we also reworked Wikipedia:Pages needing translation into English, a place to coordinate work on material in foreign languages that is added to the English-language Wikipedia. This material is usually added anonymously; it can come in the form of new articles or additions to existing articles; and it contains a disproportionate number of copyright violations.
[edit] Deletion
Votes for deletion (VfD) went through many changes before reaching its present form of 3-level-templates.
[edit] Wikipedia:Administrators
An anon on 2 April 2002 notes on the historical page Wikipedia talk:Blocked IPs that Brion VIBBER, Lee Daniel Crocker, Tim Shell, Larry_Sanger, Koyaanis Qatsi appear to be the de facto editorial/censor board. In the following exchange the anon noted Presumably some political process for deciding this must evolve... "electing sherrifs" or whatever...
[edit] Page movement
- User:Willy on Wheels and sockpuppets
- Pelican Shit vandals
[edit] Bad image list
- Goatse.cx
- The Autofellatio debacle
[edit] Projects
[edit] Notable contributors
This section identifies editors who are prominent for something other than number of edits.
- User:Angela — Angela Beesley was one of the first two user-elected members of the Board of Trustees of Wikimedia.
- User:Jimbo Wales — one of the founders of Wikipedia (just in case anyone does not already know).
- User:Larry Sanger, the other founder of Wikipedia, an early employee of Jimbo Wales who helped shape the early Wikipedia. Since leaving the project, he has been visible chiefly for criticizing what he sees as its failings.
- User:Raul654 — the Features Article Director (see above). He is variously referred to as 'Raul' and 'Mark' (his real name).
- User:Ta bu shi da yu — Created the famous exploding whale unusual article, the Wikipedian Administrators' noticeboard and converted the Wikipedia:Peer review page to use transclusions.
[edit] Notable vandals
- Willy on Wheels — Most prolific vandal ever, creating page move vandalism
- Mr. Treason — One of the first vandals to get a page on how to deal with him
[edit] Other stories
- The user whose only contribution to Wikipedia was to use his/her webpage to exchange flirtation with other Wikipedians.
- An editor left a note that she was going to commit suicide, which prompted a flurry of concern on EN-wikipedia back in 2003. [1] [2]
- In what some saw as a sign that Wikipedia had grown to a state where few could keep track of all of the goings-on, Michael Snow created The Signpost, a community newspaper, in January 2005. (This relates to Wikipedia:Goings-on how? - the progression has been: random chat in article pages -> Wikipedia Chat (the IRC channel) -> Village Pump and Announcements -> Community Portal -> Goings-on -> Signpost)
