Talk:Gedhun Choekyi Nyima

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material of any kind that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.

Biography Portal

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ]

This article is part of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. Please participate by editing the article Gedhun Choekyi Nyima, or visit the project page for more details on the projects.

Guidelines:
Chinese Manual of Style - Naming conventions
Indic Manual of Style - Naming conventions
Japanese Manual of Style
Korean Manual of Style - Naming conventions
Tibetan Proposed naming conventions

1 Requested move
- 1.1 Discussion
2 External Link : The truth the mainland Chinese government doesn't want you to know
3 Broken link

[edit] Requested move

Copied from WP:RM. Dragons flight 05:55, August 30, 2005 (UTC)

Since the page for the Chinese version of the Panchen Lama, Erdini Qoigyijabu has no "11th Panchen Lama" suffix to his name, we should remove it from Gedhun Choekyi Nyima's name because two different people think they are the Panchen Lama. --Hottentot

Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~

Support --Hottentot 06:19, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
Reserved, I would also have no prob with adding "11th Panchen Lama" suffix to Erdini Qoigyijabu, as both are claimed to be that incarnation.Alf 12:01, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
Oppose, I dont believe just because their is a dispute that it should be removed (though I favor this canidate to be the true panchen lama). I think until proof might one day be given, they both be marked the "11th Panchen Lama", especially in the case that it starts a devision on the line of reincarnations. Midusunknown 11:53, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

It was requested that this article be renamed but there was no consensus for it be moved. Since the other Panchen Lama also now has the title in his name, and none of the discussions on the matter seem to have attracted much attention, I'm going to close this as no consensus and go with the apparent convention to let them keep the title. Dragons flight 05:01, 15 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Discussion

Discusion requested to be centralised at Panchen Lama. Alf 01:34, 2 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] External Link : The truth the mainland Chinese government doesn't want you to know

The truth the mainland Chinese government doesn't want you to know...

Does anybody else think the external link above would be helpful? I have posted it to this article, but it was removed by Hottentot. Please give an opinion. I personally, believe that the link is extremely relavent to the article.--FT in Leeds 02:10, 2 September 2005 (UTC)

I think the news article is fine, but I must admit the above titlte is very POV, I'm fine with how I left it as I see no problem refering to it by the same name as the BBC uses for the article. I personally do not mind discussing these three articles on individual pages, but I genuinely think we'd be better talking about them together, on one page. Alf 12:01, 2 September 2005 (UTC)