Talk:Eastern philosophy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of the Philosophy WikiProject, an attempt at creating a standardised, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use Philosophy resource. Please read the instructions and standards for writing and maintaining philosophy articles. |
Alright, whoever is writing all that stuff about Christianity under legalism better stop it. --Darthanakin 06:07, 19 November 2005 (UTC) Alright, its this guy 164.82.85.3, watch out for this guy --Darthanakin 06:14, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
- Nah. It's that Ant-Crist guy again... Banno 06:22, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
The following sentence is incorrect:
"Shared concepts include the supernatural, the immortal soul (ancestor of mind-body dualism)"
The concept of the supernatural and the immortal soul is not limited to these two civilizations but occours almost universally in human culture throughout the world.--Vonaurum 09:44, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] NPOV part 2
Doesn't this seem a bit like an argument against the east/west distinction, and less like an article explaining what eastern philosophy is? Does there really need to be two refutations of the term, but yet no explanation of why the difference exists, or what makes the difference in the first place? --Omestes 16:35, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] WTF?
What the hell is going on here? See Talk:Eastern culture and RFC for more confusion... [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{1}}}|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/{{{1}}}|contribs]]) 18:20, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Wilber?
Why does this article mention Ken Wilber? Is it really that significant? --romanm (talk) 21:35, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Wiki Project Policy
Wikipedia:WikiProject Philosophy are developing a policy relevant to this article at Wikipedia:WikiProject Philosophy/geographic divisions. Banno 18:18, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] NPOV
While I agree with the sentiment expressed, the expression leaves much to be desired. This article expresses a point of view without citation. Banno 18:58, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Rewrite introduction
The introduction starts in a negative tone. There is no need to contrast with Western philosophy in the first line itself...Eastern philosophies stand on its own and i would like to rewrite about it in positive terms.
the intro is overly hostile, and assumes a philosophical standpoint (universal philosophy) to criticize opposing philosophies. not only does this not meet up to wikipedia standards, it is off topic.
[edit] Maoism = Mohism
"Maoism" was obviously "Mohism" (The school of Mozi) in origin. Please correct. 87.0.208.22 13:02, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] God
Why is God capitalized all throughout this article? If not refering to one of the Abrahamic religions then god should remain in lowercase because it is NOT a name. If there was a good reason to capitalize god then gods should also be capped.
198.110.32.2 00:47, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
