Talk:Cybersex
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[Removed copyrighted material]
IMHO, this piece is too emotional and opinionated to be considered neutral and impartial. It's a valid opinion, but inappropriate for an encyclopedia entry. Modemac
Men, ask your wives if they'd be happy to have you engage in phone sex or cybersex with someone than her. I bet the answer will be delivered with a frying pan to the head! We should mention that cybersex is generally (or "often") considered a form of infidelity. --Ed Poor
- Presumably it's infidelity only if done with someone other than one's spouse/partner/significant other? --Brion
While there are a lot more women online than there used to be, and many of them do "cyber," there are a lot of guys out there who take female "avatars" and do cybersex just to get their rocks off. And there are lots of guys out there who have cybersex, knowing that the person on the other end is a guy, and not really caring because it's just role-playing.
- Umm, doesn't everyone who has cybersex do so to "get their rocks off"? Just a thought...
Just a note. User Vkem posted a large chunk of copyrighted material in this article. [1] --mav
A small question: What's an ephebophile? --Two Halves not logged on
- Google is your friend [2]
While I know that it is illegal for youth to participate in sex before a certain age, is it illegal for somebody to have cybersex? And if not, is it being considered? Just a question.--Thecosmos 02:39, May 20, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Cleanup
This was nothing more than a pov-laden emotional rant, and while I've cleaned it up, this is not a well-written article. It needs to be significantly improved before the tag is removed. Let's write encyclopedia articles, shall we, not rambling u.s.-centric diatribes about cybersex' "emotional damage" of teens, while a huge number of adults engage in some sort of sexual interaction online, be it flirting, roleplaying or cybersex. Also, this article does not make clear that a good deal of roleplaying is not that different from standard erotic literature (albeit often very badly written). -- Zantastik talk 10:32, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Quite a while ago, I found this and it said this: "it is fun, you should try it" or it was somthing else. Did anybody see this?
This article discusses different motivations behind cybersex, but I postulate one unmentioned (inasmuch as I can see) which is that of practice... A lot of people I know enjoy the idea of cybersex as practice before one's first time, so as to get it right on the wedding night.. as long as both participants behave realistically to the best of their ability.
In "Disadvantages..." I changed the term pedophiles to underage-sex predators, because most often, police are baiting persons seeking presumably illegal sexual activities with adolescents (and not necessarily people with a sexual interest in young children.) Perhaps there is a better wording than underage-sex predators, though. Stevemcl 01:42, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
April fools edit. Sorry for any inconviniance. User:tomtyke 05.57, 1st April 2006 (BST)
Examples, maybe?
links:
i think http://p4.forumforfree.com/teen2teen.html should be added any objections? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.92.246.41 (talk • contribs) 17:11, 8 September 2006.
- Yes, objections. Please read WP:EL for guidelines on suitable external links - forums are almost never appropriate. ~ Booya Bazooka 21:30, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] WHAT?
Could someone add more disadvantages? This is immoral. It's absolutely stupid anyway. I'm getting tired of seeing these stupid, "Sex Texting" on the Cellphone. --66.218.11.146 07:25, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] More cleanup maybe?
"Debate continues among moralists on whether cybersex is a form of infidelity." That doesn't seem to take account of the possibility of two committed people in a long-distance relationship, or even a married couple unavoidably separated for a while, having cybersex, which would certainly not be infidelity! Loganberry (Talk) 04:58, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
