Talk:Croton-on-Hudson, New York
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The article's coverage of local politics is too one sided. This article gives the false impression that there is wide agreement on the community center question and also overlooks grave issues facing the town, such as rampant loitering around the railroad tracks and public parks.
- What "coverage of local politics?" All I see is a list of elected officials. Is that really enough to merit a "NPOV dispute label?" By the way, I am removing a couple of unrelated, unverifiable items.--Do Not Talk About Feitclub (contributions) 06:23, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
im a resident of this town, and i dont see anything that seems one seems one sided... in any fashion. it all seems like factss to me, altough i diddnt read it over too carefully... i might have missed somthing
I'm taking the NPOV template down, since nobody seems willing to stand up for it. --djrobgordon 21:48, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
How can no one see the NPOV issue here? It is clear that the Community Center segment was added by Community Center advocates to give the false impression that there is a broad consesus that supports the idea of a Community Center. The POV tag is going back where it belongs: on this biased page. -Thad
Taking down some of the stuff like the "club exxon" bit, I live here and have never heard this phrase in my entire life.
