Talk:Casio F91W
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I remember I had a Casio F91W way before 1997, so the date of introduction referenced in the article is no correct. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cirilobeto (talk • contribs) . 16:09, 2006 July 2
Contents |
[edit] I had one, too.
I had one since about 1992. Though now the area where the strap pins go through has broken off on one side, I still keep it running since I think it keeps particularly good time. Not to mention this watch gets rather astounding battery life. It's only on it's second battery since I got it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.114.93.6 (talk • contribs) . 20:10, 2006 July 20
- I will remove the date of introduction in the article while it is stablished in which date it was actually introduced. I'm positively sure that this watch was from the late 80's / early 90's. --Cirilobeto 17:39, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, I am on my fourth of these. They last about 4-5 years (the last two I bought at Fry's in San Jose or Palo Alto, the most recent less than a year ago). They are remarkably reliable and accurate (all four gained time slightly, but no more than a second a week) 65.91.54.2 15:01, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Relevancy
I don't see how the stuff about terrorists it relevant, especially in so much detail. Maybe some background, and cult following information would be better? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.200.13.168 (talk • contribs) . 17:25, 2006 October 20
- You are joking right? The alleged association with terrorism is the most interesting thing about this watch. -- Geo Swan 07:38, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Indirect Source
Source #3 does not have the original document as the link, It should be this instead: http://nationaljournal.com/about/njweekly/stories/2006/0203nj4.htm
Other links may also be references to original articles... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 128.192.206.19 (talk • contribs) . 21:50, 2006 October 20
In last time terrorists used the Casio DB-36 model. :) http://www.watch.watchzone.ru/casio/Casio_DB-36-9.phtml--Sergei Frolov 17:51, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] deleting unexplained tag
I deleted the unexplained {dispute} tag.
Like many other tags, the {dispute} tag tells interested readers to look to the talk page for a discussion of the tag. So far as I am concerned, this places a burden on the person who placed the tag to explain themselves. -- Geo Swan 07:49, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
