Talk:Canadian Parliamentary Cats

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Cats Portal This article is supported by the Cats WikiProject. This project provides a central approach to Cat-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)

This article is part of WikiProject Ottawa, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Ottawa and Canada's National Capital Region. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.

• Whats the rational behind moving the picture of the cat house to the bottom and making it so small? Isn't it a better picture of have at the top of the article? James R. Skinner 23:35, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

I think the image of the cat it a better "introductory" photograph, since it is an article about stray cats on Parliament Hill, not about the structure built to house them. Thumbelina walking around the cannon gives that impression immediately, that it's a stray cat walking around a historic site. (It's not my photograph btw, just one I got the photographer to release for this article, because it seemed so perfect). The structural photograph was resized simply so it would fit into the article without distorting text. Sherurcij ^{(talk) (Terrorist Wikiproject)} 01:05, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

• I'm glad the new photos are appreciated...however, I want to argue the case of keeping in an explicit reference to the cat's mousing abilities. This was indeed confirmed to me by Chartrand (though it is his opinion, which is why it was indicated as such). What do you think? Archiesteel 04:55, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

Personally I guess I feel it's just assumed that cats eat mice, but maybe I take that for granted having grown up with barncats. shrugs It's not a huge deal to me either way, I just felt it weighed down the article a bit. Sherurcij ^{(Speaker for the Dead)} 05:15, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

It's not necessarily obvious that the cats are allowed inside to help control the mouse population, and so I think it's warranted to add it in. I've put a less wordy version of the information back. Anyway, it's not as if the article is that long-winded (though I'm not sure if it still deserves to be considered a stub...there's not that much to add on the subject). Archiesteel 21:58, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

By the way, I'm fine with the rewrite. :-) Archiesteel 22:38, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

• 

  

  Thumbelina + landmarks
  If you guys are interested, I have a two nice hi-res photo of Thumbelina, one that shows the Ottawa Gallery and the Notre-Dame Cathedral, and another one which shows a close-up of her. I didn't put them in the article (after all we shouldn't over-represent a single cat), but I uploaded them anyway.
  

  

  Close-up
  The first one could perhaps replace the current one, as it directly links it to the city, but I like the one with the cannon as well and so did not replace it. Archiesteel 04:55, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

Wow, you're right...I like the cannon image we have...but I also like that one of Thumbelina against the fence. (ThumbelinaCat2) Tough choice, to be honest - personally I'd suggest holding an informal vote to see which one people prefer, then making sure that the other one is definitely put up on WikiCommons - and then have a link on this article saying "See other photos of the cats on Wikicommons". Nice photos, I've never actually met Chartrand myself...don't suppose you have any photos of him? Sherurcij ^{(Speaker for the Dead)} 05:15, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

René Chartrand

Of course, I'm biased towards my photo... :-) The colors are more vibrant, the horizon isn't skewed, there are two Ottawa landmarks on it and it's available in high-resolution. So I'll vote for mine... As for Chartrand, I unfortunately don't have any good photos of him: they're all from the back or blurry. Still, I've uploaded the best (or least sucky) one I have of him...if you think it's alright we could always put it on the page, though in my opinion that photo is not good enough. Archiesteel 22:09, 4 November 2006 (UTC)