User talk:Calsicol
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Katelyn Faber
Could you weigh in at the bottom of the Talk Page for Katelyn Faber regarding the inclusion of an image of her? User:Tufflaw, who unsuccessfully tried to have the entire article deleted back in December 2005 insists on censoring/deleting it for extremely specious reasons, and I've been asked to gather a consensus. Please read the bottom two sections of that page. Thanks. Nightscream 19:00, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Category:Hispanic inhabited regions
You might want to consider the deletion vote of Category:Kurdish inhabited regions. --Cat out 11:49, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] List of United States musicians AfD 2
Following my deletion of all sublists linked to List of United States musicians, a deletion review was of the opinion that all of them should be undeleted and relisted, because there were no AfD tags on the sublists during the first AfD. You may wish to comment in the new AfD: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of United States musicians (2nd nomination). Kimchi.sg 12:31, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] category:Cricketers
Hi. I see you have added this category to the cricket root and said it is "a fundamental top tier category". In fact it was already part of category:Cricket people which is itself in the root. The point is that cricket is not only about cricket players as we also have noted umpires, writers, administrators, commentators, coaches, groundsmen, etc. What do you think? --Jack 12:54, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
- It's a practical matter. I would expect to find the cricketers category at the top level, just as the player category is at the top level for other sports. If "People" began with "C" it wouldn't matter much, but it doesn't. Calsicol 15:08, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
- Okay. Fair enough. --BlackJack | talk page 20:00, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Category:Buildings and structures in the United States by city
Greetings! I had a quick question on this category. A couple building-specific articles have added this category to their pages. I was just wondering if they shouldn't be doing that, since there are city-specific categories for this purpose. Seems a bit redundant. A similar thing is happening with Category:Skyscrapers by city. I assume this is meant as an organization tool and not meant to be on individual article pages, unless it's an article like List of Vancouver's 10 tallest buildings. Let me know if I'm wrong! Thanks! -Rkitko 00:02, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
- I agree. Any individual articles added to those categories should be removed. Calsicol 15:06, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] People by language
Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2006 July 19#People by language
Please confirm whether you meant your previous discussion to apply to the 3 remaining languages, as they received only 4 days of comments, instead of the full 7.
- --William Allen Simpson 18:51, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
- Before you respond to the canvassing of the above user, I would urge you to note the ongoing discussion of this subject here. This is not something to be quickly swept under the carpet. Deb 21:05, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Freeway/motorway/whatever category
--SPUI (T - C) 19:09, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Bellerive Elementary School
Hello Calsicol. I was curious if you would be interested in helping me expand the Bellerive Elementary School article which is currently up for deletion. Also, you may be interested in joining Wikipedia:WikiProject Schools if that is a subject that interests you. Keep in touch, Silensor 01:09, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Charing Cross in the 19th century.jpg
Just a note. I have changed Charing Cross railway station to Charing Cross (London) railway station. Simply south 20:44, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:Categories for discussion
As a participant of a similar nomination (Category:Hispanic inhabited regions), I thought you might want to look at this nomination --Cat out 07:56, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:Category for deletion
Sir: Can you explain why my category for deletion (Category:People from Haiti has been overlooked all day. I explained that it was an accidental duplication of an existing category (Haitian people) and that it is empty.
This is a no-brainer. Thanks, HOT L Baltimore 12:36, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
