Talk:Bolton Wanderers F.C.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
The article on Bolton Wanderers F.C. is supported by the WikiProject on Football, which is an attempt to improve the quality and coverage of football related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page; if you have any questions about the project or the article ratings below, please consult the FAQ. |
|---|---|
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. |
Contents |
[edit] Current Squad
Please leave the current squad section the style it is now! its nice to look at and gives all information clearly! thanks, BoltonWatcher
[edit] Talk
How can McAteer and Stubbs not be noted on the famous past players list??? --vega007
They are now.
Hi, can someone put Ali Al Habsi on the bolton player list? Thanks Agent003 edit: ok never mind done it!! thanks
please dont put borgetti on the players list he doesnt even play for us yet! and the top 4 include EVERTON liverpool are not in the top 4 unless they finish there this season get it right! user:62.255.32.12
- Liverpool are one of the 'Top 4', Everton did well last year but need to finish in the top 4 about 8 more times to get into the 'Top 4' category. Everton are ranked as 'best english teams outside top 4' with Bolton and Middlesbrough. as for Borgetti, he signed for Bolton earlier this month. And is part of the Bolton Wanderers squad. Agent003
no i suggest you check the official bolton site my friend and look at big sams comments in which he states that a deal for borgetti is still a 'LONG WAY OFF' let me paste his comments for you
"Borgetti is a player I would like to bring to the club but we are still a long way off doing a deal with him," Allardyce told the club's website.
"We won't have any indication if a deal can be done until he arrives in England until then it is out of our hands.
- Yes, i accept that at the moment that deal is now 'A LONG WAY OFF', this was only announced this morning. i did update the main page with this information. - Agent003
Is there some way of putting the real kit pictures on the page? No soz mate its copyright. Extremely good idea though you must be really mint
[edit] Best outside top 4
I don't think Bolton actually are generally considered one of the best teams outside the top four. Could you source that please? I'd suggest that a lack of recent trophies, no participation in Europe until this coming season and generally lacklustre performance would suggest that Bolton are far from one of the "best". In any case, this kind of judgement is far better included as a quote than as a statement of fact. Philip Arthur 06:07, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
Note this: "Since then, Bolton Wanderers have preserved their Premiership place with 16th, 17th, 8th and in the season 2004/5 6th place which gave them their first ever qualification for European football." This would suggest that Bolton has been improving but there just isn't any consistent achievement there. Hope the Trotters fans among us won't take it too amiss. Philip Arthur 06:09, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
But since being in the premiership the have got to the Carling cup final and FA Cup Quarter-final.
- Comment - Im sorry ive reverted your edits as Wikipedia is not a football opinion fourm! -- The Time Killer
-
- Comment - Just to close this argument. The best out side top 4 statement is now gone and has been for some time. Thanks, Bwfc 23:27, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Squad list
I have reverted back to the version which uses Template:Football squad player for the playing squad. This format was chosen by consensus following discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football regarding a means of standardising squad lists for all teams. Oldelpaso 20:09, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
What i posted on Oldelpaso's talk page
Hi, if Bolton's page can't have the squad list the way i set it (i accept your reasons why!), Can we make it (and others) in the style of West Ham United F.C.? They do seem to have the best format for there squad list. Thanks, Bwfc 23:22, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
- I am of the opinion that putting previous club or other biographical information about players is unnecessary as it is available by clicking on the player's name and looking at their article. For year signed, this raises questions, for example should this mean the year the first contract with the club is signed or the year of first team debut? In the West Ham example this varies. Of course, this is all just in my opinion. If you wish to put forward the West Ham style as a proposed standard template, I'd suggest leaving a message at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football/Clubs as it will reach more people on there. Oldelpaso 22:05, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Previous / Next match
I have removed these on the grounds that Wikipedia is not a news service. That sort of thing is the remit of Wikinews, not an encyclopedia article. Oldelpaso 10:35, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
