Talk:Australian 1st Armoured Division
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. |
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. |
|
Related task forces...
|
|
 |
Australian 1st Armoured Division is part of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page. | ||
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. | ||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. | ||
|
Article Grading: |
|||
 |
This article is supported by WikiProject Australian Military|Australian 1st Armoured Division | ||
|
WikiProject Australia To-do:
|
|||
 |
An appropriate infobox needs to be added to this article, or the current infobox needs to be updated. The template to use is {{Infobox Military Unit }}. |
[edit] 1st Armoured Division disbandment
As part of my expansion of the Divisional history, I've restored my statement that the Division was disbanded in September 1943 with 1st Armoured Brigade surviving as an independant brigade. As 1st Armoured Brigade was a pre-existing unit prior to September 1943 it is not correct to state that the division was 'downsized to a brigade group'. Rather, most of the Division's units (including the Divisional HQ) were disbanded with the surviving units coming under the command of 1st Armoured Brigade. My source for this is Australian Armour. A History of the Royal Australian Armoured Corps 1927-1972 by Major General R.N. Hopkins (see page 129). --Nick Dowling 05:41, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
- Nick, I guess it's a question of interpretation, as was my (now deleted) statement that the division was never fully-formed. A brigade group (a concept which was used widely by Commonwealth armies in WW2) is not a brigade; it is more accurately defined as a unit with the fighting strength of a brigade but all the other attributes (support staff, logistics, etc) of a division. Likewise I'm not sure that a "division" with only two brigades could be described as full-formed, but as I say it's a matter of opinion and I'm not that bothered about it. Grant65 | Talk 03:38, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
- Grant, British pattern armoured divisions like the 1st Armoured only had 2 Brigades + supporting elements. Hopkins, who was a key player in the formation and design of the division, states that it was at full strength by early 1943. The 2nd and 3rd Armoured Divisions never reached their full strength though. --Nick Dowling 09:57, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
- Fair enough, I didn't know that. Grant65 | Talk 11:36, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
