Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Berlin
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Michael Berlin
Does not appear to meet the guidelines at WP:PROF. The "Glaucoma Institute of Beverly Hills" is Berlin's private practice. Despite what one may infer from the article, his academic involvement is not impressive: 8 total papers (only 1 in the past 10 years) and only two on glaucoma (none in the past 10 years).[1] Not convinced that work on "Excimer Laser Trabeculostomy" is that notable enough per guidelines at WP:PROF. AED 00:25, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails WP:PROF, numerous cleanup tags on the article that do not appear to be solved anytime soon. Doesn't look like the organizations are particularly notable, though one has an article, but he doesn't appear notable enough within that. DoomsDay349 05:01, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
- delete In light of the paltry number of citations in scholarly press, this guy appears to be a non-notable ophthamologist. If additional references can be provided to establish ntoability, I will of course change my vote. --Jayron32 05:40, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Not notable. Sr13 07:32, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete NN WP:PROFSkierRMH 08:13, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete the professor does not have enough notability (according to WP:PROF) to justify him an article.ยค~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 19:46, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
- Weak delete May be notable, but doesn't cite sources. P.B. Pilhet / Talk 23:17, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
