Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ah-ni-yv-wi-ha
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was redirect. Neutralitytalk 18:32, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Ah-ni-yv-wi-ha
-
- Delete. As the sole author, I want this content removed as I do not wish a site that allows lynch mobs and libel and defacement of information to act as a repository for our culture. There's no guarantee that our information will not be defaced by anonymous internet users. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Gadugi (talk • contribs) 03:18, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Several users have edited this article so it doesn't qualify for speedy deletion by the sole contributor. if the article is factual, as I presume it to be, it should remain. DES (talk) 05:21, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect to correct spelling: Ah-ni-yv-wi-ya --Icarus 06:13, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
- Changed vote: Merge any info not already there to Cherokee language. (I kept my old vote above because other voters have cited it.) --Icarus 17:35, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
- There's nothing to merge. The article already has a complete phonology which makes it quite obvious that no [r] exists. The same goes for the agglunative nature of the morphology. / Peter Isotalo 20:42, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
- In that case, I change my vote back to Redirect or delete. Redirect if it's likely that someone will search for this misspelling, delete if it's not. I'm not familiar enough with the subject to make that decision. --Icarus 21:10, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
- There's nothing to merge. The article already has a complete phonology which makes it quite obvious that no [r] exists. The same goes for the agglunative nature of the morphology. / Peter Isotalo 20:42, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect as above; appears to be a duplication. In any event, no valid criteria for deletion. -- MCB 06:16, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect as per Icarus3. Capitalistroadster 07:25, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect as per Icarus3. TheMadBaron 10:56, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect both renditions to Cherokee. We're not a Cherokee-English dictionary and the tribe is not widely known under this name. Keeping a separate article for the native name is like keeping separate articles for "日本人" and "Japanese people". / Peter Isotalo 14:15, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect Molotov (talk) 21:20, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
- Keep - see comments on other articles submited by same editor. ≈ jossi ≈ 21:44, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.