Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abandoned toys

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Woohookitty 10:00, 18 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Abandoned toys

Does not meet WP:MUSIC and notability is not established. CHAIRBOY 17:13, 3 September 2005 (UTC)

• Delete per above. CHAIRBOY 17:13, 3 September 2005 (UTC)

• keep Their score for isolationist lovers is one of the best film scores I own.

• Unsigned vote by User:71.99.165.86

• keep It was just posted on a music forum that this article was up for deletion, so I

            thought I would voice my opinion on it.  This is a new side project, by the 
            composer for "The synthetic dream foundation", which is one of the most prominent
            electronic music projects in the industrial and dark ambient worlds.  The fact, 
            that this band has the same composer and member as a major, prominent band, makes
            it follow one of the 5 necessary ingredients for inclusion based on the rules 
            regulating the inclusion of bands for Wikipedia.

• Unsigned vote by User:66.139.73.201

• keep Sorry bad english. Keep band for popular in Venezuela.

• Unsigned vote by User:200.75.131.58

• keep I followed the same link mentioned above, and for the same reasons mentioned above

            this is certainly a notable composer and their work should be represented in
            Wikipedia

• Second unsigned vote by User:71.99.165.86

• keep This page needs alot of work, but should definitely be kept to be worked upon. I'm no film score buff, but I own one of the scores by this artist

• Unsigned vote by User:69.22.75.138, first edit

One of plenty on 3rd September that need more participation for a useful decision. -Splash 00:01, 12 September 2005 (UTC)

• Strong Delete Fails to meet WP:MUSIC and Heavy SOCK Infected --Aranda56 02:09, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Notability is not established, and hardly even claimed in the article. If fans think the person's done anything notable prior to this, than put that in the article, and cite sources that prove it. -rob 02:43, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Sock-puppets do not count as establishing notability no matter WHOSE hand may be up their rears making them talk :P Nezu Chiza 02:57, September 12, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. I get 0 google hits for "isolationist lovers". If someone can demonstrate that they have actually scored a well-known film, I'd change my vote. Nandesuka 03:09, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Doesn't meet WP:music popularity with sockpuppets notwithstanding. Capitalistroadster 04:03, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete.No socks please. This is just not noteworthy.Voice of All (talk) 06:50, September 12, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, fails WP:MUSIC. - Mgm|^(talk) 09:05, September 12, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete: "New side project" pretty much says it all. Wikipedia is not a place for announcements or ads or breathless fan talk. This is a tertiary source of information, so the group needs to have already established themselves as not only widely known, but important. Geogre 10:48, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - vanity and using sock puppets! o_O
• Delete - web link contains almost no content. not notable enough. -- Klafubra 16:27, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete vanity + sockpuppets = delete Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 16:57, September 12, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete and abandon the sockpuppets. RasputinAXP talk * contribs 20:06, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete; doesn't even assert notability. Owen× ☎ 20:56, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, stop the sockpuppets! Andrew pmk | Talk 22:46, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Who's trying to cheat on AfD? — Stevey7788 (talk) 03:29, 13 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.