User talk:Arnoutf

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents 1 Jack Vance page 2 VWN en WCN 3 ==Arbitration request== 4 Comment 5 Template:Eighty Years' War Battles 6 Eighty Years' War/test 7 Welcome template 8 Edits on 80 years war 9 Edit on Way of St James - External Links - removal of link to Camino Santiago de Compostela 10 Please join! 11 Welcome to the Military history WikiProject! 12 Military history WikiProject coordinator election - vote phase! 13 Military history WikiProject Newsletter - Issue VI - August 2006 14 New Zealand 15 Nieuw Zeeland 16 WikiProject Military history Newsletter - Issue VII - September 2006 17 rev on The Netherlands 18 Dutch not a Germanic people? 19 Arbcom 20 Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Ulritz 21 Trolling 22 Ultra-Renaissance art movement 23 The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue VIII - October 2006 24 Way of St. James link removed 25 social psychology 26 Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Ulritz

[edit] Jack Vance page

Arnoutf, I was the one who made the comment in the Vance Integral Edition section which you reacted to. I am well aware that conflicts should be resolved in the discussion page. If you had looked there you would see that I have been struggling, for weeks, to resolve them. In fact I am up against a set of determined vandals, and I need help.--PaulRhoads 19:37, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] VWN en WCN

Beste allemaal Al enige tijd is er een Nederlandstalig chapter in oprichting, te vinden op http://nl.wikimedia.org . Dit wordt de Vereniging Wikimedia Nederland (VWN). Je kunt je interesse om lid te worden van deze vereniging hier aangeven.

Deze vereniging gaat eind augustus/begin september een Wikimedia Conferentie in Nederland (WCN) houden, volgend op Wikimania in Boston, gedeeltelijk erop inspelend middels een aantal discussiegroepen. Om iets dergelijks te organiseren is imput erg gewenst. Dus als je wilt meehelpen, of als je interesse hebt om bij een dergelijk evenement aanwezig te zijn, geef dat dan aan op nl.wikimedia. Ik hoop daar snel je imput tegemoet te zien! Met vriendelijke groet, Effeietsanders 25 feb 2006 12:27 (CET)

[edit] ==Arbitration request==

I would like to inform about the Arbitration request concerning the long discussion on Talk:Dutch language.

[The link to the Arbitration request will follow soon, as I have to inform you before posting]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#Statement_by_Sander_on_Talk:Dutch_language

Sander 10:37, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Comment

I made a comment to your vote at Talk:Creation according to Genesis#Proposing split. ems (not to be confused with the nonexistant pre-dating account by the same name) 11:35, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Template:Eighty Years' War Battles

I came across a template of yours created very recently, and it looks ver much like a more compact and simpler version of "mine" also created recently Template:Eighty Years' War.

Which one whould be best, or should we make a brand new one? Rex Germanus Tesi samanunga is edele unde scona 12:35, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Eighty Years' War/test

Aaargh, the {{inuse}} tag was put there for a reason! I just spent two hours rewriting the test page, only to find that you've been rewriting it as well. Please stop for a while, I am going to overwrite your changes and then reapply them. Piet 10:48, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

Soory my fault, don't bother putting too muhc time in reapplying mine as I see your edits have the same purpose as mine, a lot of text editing; so no need to reapply mine. I will have a go at the text tonight or later, to see if I think something is left out Arnoutf 11:15, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

I've removed the "Spanish interests" part of the "Background" section because most of the information was repeated elsewhere in the article. Most of your changes to this section have been applied to other sections. What I didn't add was calling Philip II a fanatic catholic. Probably correct, but so was his father I think. And so were the calvinists. I would leave it out, the times being what they were, most people had to be fanatics. I've removed the inuse tag now, so you can go ahead. Piet 11:24, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome template

Hi, and can I thank you for welcoming users to Wikipedia! Just a quick note, the standard welcome message is at {{welcome}}, so instead of copying and pasting, you can simply type {{subst:welcome}}~~~~. Keep up the good work! -- cds^(talk) 18:12, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanks couldn't find the template I was sure there was! Arnoutf 18:16, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Edits on 80 years war

So, you can added more commander who I dont know, but William and Philip was the most famous commander in the war. Thank you Murderman 18:30, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Edit on Way of St James - External Links - removal of link to Camino Santiago de Compostela

I am sorry your saw my photographs as just a photo album. The site is intended to display the beauty of the Camino and the efforts of the pilgrims who walk great distances to Santiago de Compostela. The fact the www.csj.org.uk, the main source of information for pilgrims intending to walk one of the Caminos, links to my site would strongly suggest that this is an informational site, not a photograph album.If you had walked the Camino and could understand the effects I do not think you would have made the same decision. I would like your agreement to repost the link. Thanks --- With further thought I have decided your decision was out of order - I am now going to to repost the link madmaxii 23:30, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Please join!

I'm currently trying to get a Dutch military task force started, would you join us? From what I've seen on the Eighty years war article, you could most certainly provide a (more than) worthy contribution.

If you're interested, and I hope you are, please drop a note at this talk page Cheers,  Rex  16:31, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome to the Military history WikiProject!

[edit] Military history WikiProject coordinator election - vote phase!

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will select seven coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of eleven candidates. Please vote here by August 26!

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot - 11:18, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Military history WikiProject Newsletter - Issue VI - August 2006

The August 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot -- 11:51, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] New Zealand

Thanks. ClairSamoht - Help make Wikipedia the most authoritative source of information in the world 19:42, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Nieuw Zeeland

hoezo speculatief ? uit eigen ervaring weet ik, dat een aardig aantal nieuw zeelanders niet weten waar de naam vandaan komt, en letterlijk dachten dat het iets met 'zeal' te maken had. dom, maar waar. tee 15:43, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Military history Newsletter - Issue VII - September 2006

The September 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by Grafikbot - 18:46, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] rev on The Netherlands

"(revert. Link to benin is not relevant for this section)" The contents of the removed part was the only other country in the world which has a split capital/seat of government situation, which is Benin. As the section of the added info was "Capital" I would say it is very relevant, as this is a dual uniqe situation in the world, so why did you remove it? Also note that there would be no viable other place to put this information regarding the link between Benin and The Netherlands in this respect. _{(remark by anon User:82.217.136.91 Oct 5 2006)}

The situation on Benin has no relation with that in the Netherlands, so it is a trivial fact. Because of the short length of the section, adding such a trivial fact would imply some conceptual connection between the states of the Netherlands and Benin; while the occurence of these two instances are stricty coincidental. If there is any place in an article that would be the Capital of the Netherlands article. A better place to open this discussion would have been at the talk:Netherlands page rather than on my personal talk page. Arnoutf 08:05, 5 October 2006 (UTC) PS Please sign your remarks using ~~~~

[edit] Dutch not a Germanic people?

Hi. Care to elaborate who doesnt see them as a Germanic people, for the benefit of what group? That's quite a risky assertion. Ulritz 14:02, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

See discussion and section in Germanic people article that explicitly refrs to Germanic as a historic ethnicity only, no longer to be used on contemporary ethnic groups. Arnoutf 14:08, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, but I would rather see some scholarly sources that make reference to this? Ulritz 14:22, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Sorry but I don't have those. Lacking those I think we should for now go on internal consistency within Wikipedia. but of course if the Germanic peoples article changes (with good references of course) this can change with it. Arnoutf 14:25, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Arbcom

As you know, a dispute has been going on for some while between me and User:Ulritz. I feel you are also involved and invite you to say you share. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#User:Ulritz

Rex 13:26, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Ulritz

Hello,

An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Ulritz. Please add any evidence you may wish the arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Ulritz/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Ulritz/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Arbitration Clerk FloNight 19:11, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Trolling

Please do not accuse me of trolling again, if I were trolling I would be so much more efficient, of course, that entire section on the Dutch Linguistic Map would have also been finished so much faster if User:Rex Germanus has simply answered the question instead of questioning my intelligence and treating me like a child. Ameise -- chat 12:20, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Ok sorry about that. I removed the sentence from my own remark in the Dutch language pageArnoutf 12:24, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Thank you. Ameise -- chat 12:43, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ultra-Renaissance art movement

Hi you voted Weak Keep at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ultra-Renaissance art movement per User:Buridan's vote. Please read my comments. You might want to reconsider your vote. utcursch | talk 03:21, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for notifying, of course it is not really a vote, but anyway I had a look. I see you objection but give them the benefit of doubt and keep my weak keep up. Arnoutf 07:15, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue VIII - October 2006

The October 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 20:57, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Way of St. James link removed

The last link you removed from the way of St. James site you said was a commercial site. I looked at it carefully and it looked to have a lot of useful information in it. It did not look like a commercial site mainly to me.--Filll 15:17, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Oops sorry; I saw all the Amazon buy here logos and thought it was. You are right though, I put it back on Arnoutf 17:37, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] social psychology

Hello Arnouft. I'm happy to see that I have company in editing the social psychology (psychology) page. A few days ago I posted a short message in the discussion area about reorganizing the page. I think the article has become overly long, unwieldy, redundant, and disorganized, with all the different editors and viewpoints, and recent "breakup" of psychology and sociology. I fear that it will become increasingly more detailed and convoluted if it continues on its current course. Thus, I'm planning some major revisions of the theory and concept areas, and I'd be glad to hear your thoughts on this. Best regards, Jcbutler 16:51, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Ulritz

This case is now closed and the results have been published at the link above.

Ulritz and Rex Germanus are placed on revert parole. They are limited to one revert per page per week, excepting obvious vandalism. Further, they are required to discuss any content reversions on the page's talk page. Ulritz and Rex Germanus are placed on probation for one year. They may be banned from any page or set of pages for disruptive edits, such as edit warring or incivility. All blocks and bans and are to be logged at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Ulritz#Log of blocks and bans.

For the Arbitration Committee --Srikeit ^{(Talk | Email)} 06:16, 10 November 2006 (UTC)