User talk:AngryParsley

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents 1 Archives 2 Phroziac 3 Re: Featured Article 4 AfD - Skeptic's Annotated Bible 5 Hey! 6 About the use of Image:Smalfut.jpg on your user page 7 Unless there are two spellings . . .

[edit] Archives

Archive 1

[edit] Phroziac

On your userpage, you imply the Phroziac is a boy. She is in fact female: a girl. Please consider changing this. --Celestianpower ^háblame 12:46, 1 November 2005 (UTC)

Are you sure? I could have sworn phroziac mentioned phroziac was XY. AngryParsley ^{(talk) (contribs)} 20:03, 1 November 2005 (UTC)

I just corrected this minor typo for you. Hope you don't mind. Kelly Martin (talk) 20:14, 1 November 2005 (UTC)

Phroziac is female. I really can't fathom why you can't wrap this around your head. Also, it's not very civil to say that someone "went crazy". And you get your user page protected, so you can continue to do that? That's just stubborn and irritating.--Sean|Black 02:22, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Featured Article

Dear AngryParsley: Thanks for letting me know; Omnipotence paradox was an article I worked on a while back, although it has changed quite a lot since I last saw it, and some original research has crept in since, which I'll correct shortly. Re the Scientology categorisation - no, it isn't a joke, it is perfectly serious; I shall assume, as per WP:AGF, that you weren't trying to be insulting. Thanks for letting me know about the article. Regards, --NicholasTurnbull | (talk) 12:35, 28 November 2005 (UTC)

Oh, sorry, I didn't mean to offend. Glad to know you're interested. AngryParsley ^{(talk) (contribs)} 12:43, 28 November 2005 (UTC)

So are you an atheist because of the omnipotence paradox? Yeltensic42.618 01:35, 30 November 2005 (UTC)

There are a few reasons. In addition to the numerous arguments against the existence of god, I don't find enough physical evidence pointing to his existence. An omnipotent omniscient omnibenevolent entity could do a lot better than this. I don't have anything against religion most of the time, but occasionally it causes people to do crazy things. AngryParsley ^{(talk) (contribs)} 15:41, 1 December 2005 (UTC)

I don't find the OP to be a great argument; there are too many holes in it, which are mentioned in the article. I'm an atheist because God is no longer necessary to explain how we got here; science has made him obsolete, and philosophy covers pretty much everything else. Also, the lack of physical evidence calls into question, How did they find out about him?, making it pretty obvious that he was just made up. Yeltensic42.618 17:44, 1 December 2005 (UTC)

Yeah, the omnipotence paradox isn't a very good argument. Of course, I think it's the only featured article of an argument against god. AngryParsley ^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:29, 1 December 2005 (UTC)

We should feature the Babel fish argument. Yeltensic42.618 01:25, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] AfD - Skeptic's Annotated Bible

Hello AngryParsley,

You left a note on my talk about the Omniscience Paradox for Dec 25 (and I went and voted, although all the votes have now vanished.)

I thought you might want to know that the Skeptic's Annotated Bible is being AfD'd at the moment (Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_Skeptic's_Annotated_Bible). Looks like it will be kept, but quite a busy vote.

Cheers, --Squiddy 12:48, 1 December 2005 (UTC)

Thanks! AngryParsley ^{(talk) (contribs)} 15:37, 1 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Hey!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia!

Here are some tips to help you get started:

• If you haven't already, please add your name to the new user log to let others know a little about yourself.
• Read the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the Sandbox.
• Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
• If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk or ask me on my talk page.
• To sign your name on a talk page, please finish your comments with [[User:TShilo12|Tom]]<font color="#008000">[[Wikipedia:Esperanza|e]]</font>[[User:TShilo12|r]][[User talk:TShilo12|<sup style="font-variant: small-caps; color: #129dbc!important;">talk</sup>]] 09:16, 15 February 2006 (UTC) (four tildes). The wiki will insert a link to your userpage and the timestamp.
• Not every subject needs its own page. Sometimes it is wiser to deal with certain subjects together on one page. See Wikipedia:Merge and Wikipedia:Redirect for some background. You may want to review Avoiding common mistakes to get started quickly.
• Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Enjoy! If you need any help, please don't hesitate to contact me at User talk:TShilo12.  :-)         - Tomer^talk 09:16, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

• AAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH AngryParsley ^{(talk) (contribs)} 09:17, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] About the use of Image:Smalfut.jpg on your user page

Hi, AngryParsley. You may want to remove the unfree image Image:Smalfut.jpg from your User page in order to comply with item #9 of Wikipedia:Fair use criteria, that says that we can only claim Fair use when using images in articles. Let me know if you have any doubts or needs any help. Best regards, --Abu Badali 00:04, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Unless there are two spellings . . .

One of them posted on your page, either the vandalised on the vandalism counter or the vandalized (i like this one best, but that is just the opinion of one user) on the text portion of your page is wrong. Just thought i would bring this to your attention instead of vandali(s/z)ing your page to "fix" something that isn't broken. Martimartmart 06:35, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

I am always right, even when I'm wrong. AngryParsley ^{(talk) (contribs)} 07:07, 26 September 2006 (UTC)