User talk:Iorek85
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Cut-and-paste moves
Re this note you left regarding this edit, please do not make cut-and-paste moves. Please use the move function, instead of copy-and-paste, when renaming a page. This avoids splitting the page history in several places. – Chacor 06:02, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] The international reactions page on the coup in Thailand
The Pakistan statement does not have a working link to the Pakstian country page here on Wikipedia. Seems to be something wrong with the country/flag template? Tried to fix it, no luck :/ It links to "islamic Pakistan" instead of just Pakistan.
RE: Hello again. I made a temp fix for this problem by redirecting the non-existing "Islamic Pakistan" page to the correct Pakistan page. Sorry, but my knowledge about editing templates is far from good. In reality it does not exist :) Yet.
[edit] Cleanup Lebanon
Hi Iorek, Due to the heated atmosphere currently prevailing on the page, I would like to get your input on the need for cleanup. It seems that certain sections, especially "Initial reviews" and "Targets in civilian areas," have become particularly unwieldy, to that the extent there are several lines that are extremely repetetive in different sections, and many passages that I would argue are too detailed to be included in the main article, but which rather should remain (which is where I believe some of them were actually brought from) in the appropriate subarticles (Timeline, Military actions). I also feel that in some these cases the detail added leaned more to one side than another, but that is more of a secondary concern. Let me know what you think, TewfikTalk 00:58, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
- Perhaps you could evaluate the need to shorten the "Initial reviews" section as you did with the "Targets in civilian areas," as I don't want to do anything else that could be percieved as biased by other editors. Let me know either way. Cheers, TewfikTalk 05:12, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Israel-Lebanon
This case is now closed and the results have been published at the link above.
Editors are cautioned that there may be exceptions to Wikipedia Guidelines and Style Guides due to unusual circumstances such as an important current event. Decisions need to be based on utility of the article to readers, not to literal compliance with Wikipedia rules. A diverse mix of blogs is recommended, but the extent and selection of specific blogs is a matter of content to be determined by the editors of the article. Any user, particularly Tasc, who engages in edit warring with respect to 2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict may be banned from the article for an appropriate period. All bans are to be logged at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Israel-Lebanon#Log of blocks and bans.
For the Arbitration Committee. FloNight 03:35, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Put down the time machine and step away
Tsk, tsk! With this edit you single handedly relocated the migration 110,000 people from 1948 to "following" events in 1971. I wouldn't mention it, and clearly no one caught it for two months, but I've been arguing from this number like it was the gospel truth with User:Tewfik for the past week. The horror... the horror! 
-- Kendrick7 00:08, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Will's section
Hi Iorek,
The reason that I removed the section Will added was that the link supplied (and currently referenced) was to an archived article. If you could confirm that it says what he claims that would be fine, but I'm uncomfortable with the way it stands now (where it seems to be unreferenced). Cheers, TewfikTalk 06:37, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Refactoring
Hi Iorek, Your [refactoring/archival] services are needed at Talk:2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict. See you around, TewfikTalk 21:04, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
