Indology

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Indology refers to the academic study of the history, languages, and  cultures of the Indian subcontinent.

Contents 1 Overview 2 History 3 South Asian Studies 4 Criticisms of Indology and  South Asian Studies 5 References 6 Further reading 7 See also 8 External links 8.1 Criticisms

[edit] Overview

Indology overlaps to some extent with many other areas of study, applying their techniques to the South Asian case. These include cultural or  social anthropology, cultural studies, historical linguistics, philology, textual criticism, literary history, history, philosophies and  the study of the religions of South Asia, such as Vedic religion, Brahmanism, Jainism, Buddhism, Shaivism, Vaishnavism, Sikhism, etc., besides the indigenous forms of Judaism, Christianity and  Islam in South Asia.

Finally it  may include the study of South Asian sciences, arts and  architecture.

Scholars who call themselves indologists often place special value on a thorough knowledge of the languages of India, especially the classical languages such as Sanskrit, Pāli, Prakrit, or  classical Tamil, and  they consider a knowledge of one or  more of these languages, coupled with a knowledge of the methods of philology, to be a prerequisite for contributing meaningfully to the indological research and  a characteristic feature of indology as a field.

Thus, Indology is  the intellectual pursuit of all things Indic, with a focus on the interpretation of the past. Some scholars distinguish classical indology from modern indology, the former more  focussed on Sanskrit and  other ancient language sources, the latter making more  use of contemporary language sources and  sociological approaches.

The term Indology or  (in German) Indologie [1] is  often associated with German scholarship, and  is used more  commonly in departmental titles in German and  continental European universities than in the anglophone academy.

[edit] History

Main articles: History of South Asia and  History of India

[edit] South Asian Studies

Indology may also be known as Indic studies or  Indian studies, or  South Asian studies, although scholars and  university administrators sometimes have  only partially overlapping interpretations of these nomenclatures.

Indology would not typically include the study of the contemporary economy, government, or  politics of South Asia, except insofar as these sometimes express issues that are  deeply embedded in South Asian history, and  may be illuminated by indological methods and  insights.

[ and  South Asian Studies">edit] Criticisms of Indology and  South Asian Studies

Claims of Bias in South Asian Studies have  often been made. Such real or  perceived bias can imply old-fashioned and  prejudiced outsider interpretations of Eastern cultures and  peoples:

• Biased interpretation of Indian history. For example James Mill's History of India downplays Indian history.^[1]
• One-sided, unfair, exaggerated or  exclusively negative presentation of some aspects of Hinduism or  Indian culture. For example exaggerations or  misrepresentations about Hindu theology, misrepresentations about the status of women in Hinduism, etc.
• Claims that the Indological scholarship of Indians themselves is  not scientific or  that it  is motivated by political motives, i.e. by Marxist, nationalist, Hindu, Muslim, Dravidian separatist or  other motives.
• Claims that India has not produced any worthwhile literature.^[2] Claims that Indian languages are  not scholarly languages (e.g. the linguist Michael Witzel wrote about the Indian Talageri that he "cannot read any scholarly language besides English").^[3]

Historians have  noted that during the British Empire "evangelical influence drove British policy down a path that tended to minimize and  denigrate the accomplishments of Indian civilization and  to position itself as the negation of the earlier British Indomania that was nourished by belief in Indian wisdom."^[4]

In Charles Grant highly influential "Observations on the ...Asiatic subjects of Great Britain" (1796),^[5] Grant criticized the Orientalists for being too respectful to Indian culture and  religion. His work tried to determine the Hindu's "true place in the moral scale", and  he alleged that the Hindus are  "a people exceedingly depraved".

Lord Macaulay, who introduced English education into India, claimed: "I have  never found one among them who could deny that a single shelf of a good European library was worth the whole native literature of India and  Arabia." ^[6] He wrote that Arabic and  Sanskrit works on medecine contain "medical doctrines which would disgrace an  English Farrier - Astronomy, which would move laughter in girls at an  English boarding school - History, abounding with kings thirty feet high, and  reigns thirty thousand years long - and  Geography made up of seas of treacle and  seas of butter".^[7] He advocated to create a middle Anglicised class that was "Indian in blood and  colour, but English in taste, in opinions, in morals, and  in intellect".^[8] This class of anglicized Indians would then in turn anglicize the Indian people.

One of the most influential historians of India during the British Empire, James Mill was criticized for being prejudiced against Hindus. His work "History of British India" (1817) may be the "single most important source of British Indophobia and  hostility to Orientalism".^[9] The Indologist H.H. Wilson wrote that the tendency of Mill's work is  "evil".^[10] Mill claimed that both Indians and  Chinese people are  cowardly, unfeeling and  mendacious. Both Mill and  Grant attacked Orientalist scholarship that was too respectful of Indian culture: "It was unfortunate that a mind so pure, so warm in the pursuit of truth, and  so devoted to oriental learning, as that of Sir William Jones, should have  adopted the hypothesis of a high state of civilization in the principal countries of Asia."^[11] Karl Marx's writings were also prejudiced against Indians. [2]

However, the Indologists were also often under pressure from missionary and  colonial interest groups, and  were frequently criticized by them.

[edit] References

1. ^ Mill 1858
2. ^ Macaulay, Thomas Babington, 1835, Minute on Indian education.
3. ^ Michael Witzel, 2001, Westward Ho, Electronic Journal of Vedic Studies Vol. 7 (2001), issue 2 (March 31).
4. ^ Trautmann 1997:113
5. ^ Grant, Charles. (1796) Observations on the state of society among the Asiatic subjects of Great Britain, particularly with respect to morals; and  on the means of improving it, written chiefly in the year 1792.
6. ^ http://www.atributetohinduism.com/FirstIndologists.htm
7. ^ Macaulay, Thomas Babington, 1835:242-243, Minute on Indian education.
8. ^ Macaulay, Thomas Babington, 1835:249, Minute on Indian education.
9. ^ Trautmann 1997:117
10. ^ H.H. Wilson 1858 in James Mill 1858, The history of British India, Preface of the editor
11. ^ Mill, James - 1858, 2:109, The history of British India.

[edit] Further reading

• Heinz Bechert, Georg von Simson - Einführung in die Indologie. Stand, Methoden, Aufgaben - ISBN 3-534-05466-0.
• Bryant, Edwin. The Quest for the origins of Vedic culture. (2001) Oxford University Press
• Chakrabarti, Dilip: Colonial Indology, 1997, Munshiram Manoharlal: New Delhi.
• Elst, Koenraad. (1999) Update on the Aryan Invasion Theory ISBN 81-86471-77-4
• Edmund Leach. ``Aryan Invasions Over Four Millennia. In``Culture Through Time (edited by Emiko Ohnuki-Tierney, Stanford University Press, 1990)
• Jean Filliozat and  Louis Renou - L'inde classique - ISBN B0000DLB66.
• Gauri Viswanathan, 1989, Masks of Conquest
• Kazanas, Nicholas (2001) The AIT and  Scholarship [3]
• Pollock, Sheldon. Deep Orientalism?: Notes on Sanskrit and  Power Beyond the Raj. In: Orientalism and  the Postcolonial Predicament: Perspectives on South Asia, eds. Carol A. Breckenridge and  Peter van der Veer. Philadelphia:University of Pennsylvania Press, 1993.
• Talageri, Shrikant. The Rigveda: A Historical Analysis. 2000. ISBN 81-7742-010-0 [4]
• Talageri, Shrikant. Michael Witzel - an  examination of his review of my book. 2001.
• Trautmann, Thomas. 1997. Aryans and  British India, University of California Press, Berkeley.

[edit] See also

• Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute, Pune
• Sanskrit
• Sinology

[edit] External links

• http://www.indopedia.org/Main_Page.html
• http://www.indology.net/start.php
• http://indology.info/
• http://www.ifpindia.org/-Indology-.html
• http://www.uni-tuebingen.de/indologie/
• http://www.indologie.unizh.ch/
• http://www.sai.uni-heidelberg.de/abt/IND/
• http://www.sai.uni-heidelberg.de/abt/MIND/
• http://www.indologie.uni-halle.de/
• http://www.indologie.uni-mainz.de/
• SARDS 2: Database containing bibliographic references to South Asia research articles

[edit] Criticisms

• Biases in Hinduism Studies: PART-I
• Are Hinduism studies prejudiced? A look at Microsoft Encarta
• Western Indologists: A Study in Motives
• Edmund Leach on Racism & Indology
• Rosser, Yvette. (2002) The Groan: Loss of Scholarship and  High Drama in 'South Asian' Studies [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]
• Limp Scholarship and  Demonology
• Indology:Past is  prologue
• Aryan Invasion Some quotations from Indologists on the AIT
• Thus spake Mr. Witzel "A Harvard University Case Study in Prejudice?" (2005) (pdf)
• First indologists From "A Tribute to Hinduism"
• The First Indologists by Satsvarupa dasa Goswami