User talk:QuiteUnusual
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] References
[edit] UFO Commander Seven
Thanks for the heads up. AfD time. DesertSky85451 22:10, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Disadvantaged
You said: As you disputed the prod of Disadvantaged on the article's talk page, I have de-proded it and informed the original prod'ing editor. QuiteUnusual 15:05, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
I'm disadvanted by not knowing what a prod is! --Mike 15:10, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] You are appreciated
Dear QuiteUnusual,
I went back to vehicle safety system to have a look at what I posted - I think I had a bit of a grumpy day today. I was up late last night after deciding to have a look at the kind of things that were getting deleted, and got quite annoyed at the lack of any explanation, etc. etc.
You obviously have what I expect is the rather boring task of going through the posts - I can't remember whether my comments got grumpier but if they did - apologies! - But you are appreciated - most of the posts I saw deserved to go and if they all stayed it would be a complete mess!
Someone has directed me to the discussion on deletion policy, I've had my say there, and hopefully some of my suggestions will be taken up. --Mike 16:51, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Emergency Warning System for Vehicles
Thank you for letting me know. I'll go ahead and review their comments, and file an AfD as necessary. --Elonka 18:13, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Michael Raymond Mintz
Yes, I saw that (watchlist) and you're probably right. I'm in the process of afd-ing it right now. Thanks for the heads up, though. Natalie 21:23, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] DoctorMartin
Dear QuiteUnusual, thanks for letting me know about the removal of the AFD for the Barton article. I hadn't realised there had previously been an 'AFD review' for this (I'm relatively new to Wikipedia editing - still finding my way!), and am very happy to abide by this review. As long as there is a significant viewpoint that this article has significant content, that's fine by me 17:30, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Julia Sinédia-Cazour AfD
Hello there,
I noticed you agreed with my prod to delete Julia Sinédia-Cazour. The prod was deleted but I have since listed it for AfD. If you would like to way in, you can do so here. Thanks.--Thomas.macmillan 20:13, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] AfD time again
Thanks for noticing KHL Express recently, when you gave it a prod-2. If you're interested, that bundle of articles is now at AfD [1] after an anonymous objection. --Mereda 07:46, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Viewpoint Media Player
Nice job!
E. Sn0 =31337= has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!
E. Sn0 =31337= 02:57, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
-
- Thank you, it is nice to be appreciated on occasion! QuiteUnusual 13:44, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Articles for creation backlog
Hey. Thanks for the help here. There is an enormous backlog, and it grows faster than I can work on it. Your work here is definitely appreciated.
One note though, generally {{subst:afc top}} goes below the header for a section, as this makes section editing easier. Thanks. -- kenb215 talk 04:37, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- Good point, will do. thanks! QuiteUnusual 08:58, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] 4231 menu restored
This article has been restored after its deletion was contested at Wikipedia:Deletion review. As you supported the article's deletion via WP:PROD, you may wish to nominate the article for a full deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. --Sam Blanning(talk) 11:01, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Jagmeet Singh Brar
You recently gave Jagmeet Singh Brar a {{prod2}}. In fact, as a former member of India's parliament, he is automatically notable. I cleaned up the article, and I think it's now an acceptable stub. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs)
-
- Fair enough. I couldn't tell he was notable from the article as it stood. QuiteUnusual 15:27, 26 November 2006 (UTC)