User talk:Izuko
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, Izuko, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Merovingian (t) (c) 21:38, September 9, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Townes
Sorry to have been rather oblique on the ID talk page, but didn't want to rouse a troll. The Townes position has a home at theistic evolution where his basic idea belongs, and those holding this position now have a mention at Intelligent design#Origins of the concept, end of second paragraph. It's understandable that they're annoyed that a term they feel describes their position has been hijacked by those wanting to attack evolution, but they way they say it reinforces the point that the DI's ID is the modern definition, and what readers expect when they see the term. ...dave souza, talk 21:36, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
-
- Fair enough. I still think it's being wrongly used on the page, and intend to prove it. However, now I understand a bit more of the criteria being used to judge sources. I just don't like undertaking any project without knowing what the standards are. That's been one of my biggest problems here. On the other hand, I do see y'all's position with regards to this. But I'll get my evidences and sources together and present them to the editors and let things fall where they may. Izuko 21:42, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] swallowing a tough pill
Sorry for calling you an ass and a jerk. I lost my temper there. You were being rude, but I shouldn't name-call. Now lets play nice. Sarah crane 14:23, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Take a break from Northrop Grumman?
(before I start, let me say that I have repeated this message for User:ViriiK)
Hi Izuko! There has been a heap of conflict over Northrop Grumman recently. I am thinking that it might help if you take a 1 week break from Northrop Grumman. Nothing terrible will happen, and it will let other editors get on with the article. When you come back your refreshed view will enhance the article. What do you think?--Commander Keane 15:26, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
- I notice you selected the participants on one side of the debate. So, basically, we just get to sit there while spoiled little Sarah runs around and POVs the article 'till her bratty little heart's content. I guess that's what you get when you go running to teacher for backup. I'll accept this as an order to stay away, even though I believe it to be repulsive and one-sided. Silencing dissent is not a good way to ensure quality wikipages, and that's exactly what you have done. Izuko 17:57, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- I'm sorry, but are you trying to make that in any way connect to what I've been saying? Because, if you are, I'm completely missing it. He goes to her page and gives her hugs, and then tells ViriiK and I that we can't post to NG's page for a week. That's about as similar as lead and cotton candy. Is this what passes for neutrality on wikipedia? Izuko 22:19, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
-
- The things you find when you're not editing the Northrop Gruman site: Wikipedia:Ignore_all_rules. Sounds like fun. Izuko 23:51, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
