Iraq Study Group
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Iraq Study Group (ISG), also known as the Baker-Hamilton Commission,[1] or simply the Baker Commission,[2] was a ten-person bipartisan panel appointed on March 15, 2006, by the United States Congress, that was charged with assessing the situation in Iraq and the US-led Iraq War and making policy recommendations. It was first proposed by Virginia Republican Representative Frank Wolf.[3]
The Iraq Study Group was facilitated by the United States Institute of Peace, who released the Iraq Study Group's final report on their Website on December 6, 2006.
Contents |
[edit] Members
![Lee Hamilton (left) and James Baker (right) presented the Iraq Study Group Report to George W. Bush on December 6, 2006.](../../../upload/shared/thumb/9/9e/20061206_d-0257-2-515h.jpg/300px-20061206_d-0257-2-515h.jpg)
The ISG was led by co-chairs James Baker, a former Secretary of State (and a Republican) and Lee Hamilton a former U.S. Representative (and a Democrat).
[edit] Republicans
In addition to Baker, the panel's Republican members were:
- Sandra Day O'Connor, former Supreme Court Justice
- Lawrence Eagleburger, former Secretary of State
- Edwin Meese III, former US Attorney General
- Alan K. Simpson, former U.S. Senator from Wyoming
[edit] Democrats
In addition to Hamilton, the panel's Democratic members were:
- Vernon Jordan, Jr., business executive
- Leon E. Panetta, former White House Chief of Staff
- William J. Perry, former US Secretary of Defense
- Charles S. Robb, former Governor and U.S. Senator from Virginia
[edit] Funding and support
The panel's work was facilitated by the U.S. Institute of Peace and supported by the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), the Center for the Study of the Presidency (CSP), and the James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy. It was expected to receive a US$1.3 million appropriation from Congress.[3]
[edit] Activities
[edit] Domestic
The ISG met members of the U.S. national security team, along with President Bush, on November 13.[4] Before this announcement it was reported that Baker was in regular contact with the White House, especially with National Security Advisor Stephen Hadley and President Bush.[5]
[edit] International
On 11 November 2006, it was announced that UK Prime Minister Tony Blair, who has supported President Bush in the Iraq war, was to give evidence to the ISG. A Downing Street spokesman said that Blair would give his submissions via video link on 14 November. It was believed at the time that the UK Prime Minister would outline his ideas on Iraq in a major foreign policy speech on Monday, 13 November.[6] [7]
[edit] Internal arguments
![Former Secretary of State James Baker and former Indiana Congressman Lee H. Hamilton testify before the United States Senate Committee on Armed Services. Baker and Hamilton faced tough questions from panel members and harsh criticism from Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) regarding their military advice, Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) and Sen. Joe Lieberman (D-CT) regarding the group's recommendations for starting dialogue with Iran.](../../../upload/thumb/6/6a/BAKERHAMILTONSENATE.jpg/300px-BAKERHAMILTONSENATE.jpg)
According to a report in late November in Newsday, internal strife, the assassination of a cabinet minister in Lebanon, and opposition from President Bush to the group recommending negotiations with Iran and Syria was challenging the commission's intent to issue a consensus report. An Iraq expert told the newspaper that there "has been a lot of fighting" among the expert advisers to the group, mainly between conservatives and liberals who want to take a more pragmatic approach to the Middle East. [8]
[edit] Recommendations
Although the final report was not released until December 6, media reports ahead of that date described some possible recommendations by the panel. Among them were the beginning of a phased withdrawal of US combat forces from Iraq and direct US dialogue with Syria and Iran over Iraq and the Middle East. The Iraq Study Group also found that the Pentagon has underreported significantly the extent of the violence in Iraq and that officials have obtained little information regarding the source of these attacks. The group further described the situation in Afghanistan as so disasterous that they may need to divert troops from Iraq in order to help stabilize the country. After these reports began surfacing, co-chair James Baker warned that the group should not be expected to produce a "magic bullet" to resolve the Iraqi conflict.[9]
According to a report in late November, the Iraq Study Group had "strongly urged" a large pull back of American troops in Iraq. The final report was released December 6, 2006, included 79 recommendations, and was 160 pages in length.[10]
[edit] Views about the report
At a news conference with the British Prime Minister Tony Blair in Washington on 6 December 2006, President George W. Bush commented on the Iraq Study Group's report and admitted for the first time that a "new approach" is needed in Iraq, that the situation in Iraq is "bad" and that the task ahead was "daunting". [11] President Bush said he would not accept every recommendation by the ISG panel but promised that he would take the report seriously. President Bush is expected to wait for three other studies from the Pentagon, the US State Department and the National Security Council before charting the new course on Iraq. [12] On US foreign policy, President Bush warned that he would only talk to Iran if it suspended uranium enrichment and bring Syria on board if it stops funding the insurgency in Lebanon, extends support to the Lebanese government of Prime Minister Fouad Siniora and provides economic help to Iraq. [13]
Iraqi President Jalal Talabani called the group's conclusions "very dangerous" to Iraq's sovereignty and constitution, according to CNN. "As a whole, I reject this report," Talabani said.[14]
[edit] Notes
- The Iraq Study Group Report full text (PDF)
- ^ Rubin, Michael (2006-10-30). Conclusion First, Debate Afterwards. The Weekly Standard. Retrieved on November 14, 2006.
- ^ Kinsley, Michael. "Commission improbable", The Guardian, November 14, 2006. Retrieved November 14, 2006.
- ^ a b Barrett, Ted. "Congress forms panel to study Iraq war", CNN.com, March 15, 2006. Retrieved October 11, 2006.
- ^ Feller, Ben. "Bush, Team to Meet With Iraq Study Group", Forbes, November 12, 2006. Retrieved November 13, 2006.
- ^ Sanger, David, A. "G.O.P.’s Baker Hints Iraq Plan Needs Change", The New York Times, October 8, 2006. Retrieved November 12, 2006.
- ^ "Blair in Iraq talks with US panel", BBC News, November 11, 2006. Retrieved November 11, 2006.
- ^ "Blair to give evidence to Iraq Study Group", Fox News, November 11, 2006. Retrieved November 11, 2006.
- ^ Timothy M. Phelps, "Nothing but woes for Baker group", Newsday, November 22, 2006
- ^ "Baker says no "magic bullet" for Iraq problems", Reuters, October 17, 2006. Retrieved October 20, 2006.
- ^ "Report 'urges Iraq policy shift'", BBC News, December 6, 2006. Retrieved December 6, 2006.
- ^ Bush ponders next Iraq move
- ^ Cracks appear between Bush and Blair over need for talks with Iran and Syria
- ^ President Bush vows new approach on Iraq
- ^ Iraq president rejects Baker-Hamilton report
[edit] External links
- Iraq Study Group Web site
- Iraq Study Group Report - downloadable PDF available
- Center for Strategic and International Studies - Iraq Study Group at CSIS, including a slightly different version of the report.
- Vivisimo's clustered search of the report, by paragraphs
- List of people interviewed by the ISG.
- Notes on Iraq Study Group
- How Iraq panel went from obscure to high profile from The Christian Science Monitor
Members of the Iraq Study Group | ![]() |
---|---|
Baker (Co-chair) • Hamilton (Co-chair) Eagleburger • Jordan • Meese • O'Connor • Panetta • Perry • Robb • Simpson |